Selective revealing in open innovation processes: The case of embedded Linux

Aldrich, 1986, Even dwarfs started small: liabilities of age and size and their strategic implications, 165 Allen, 1983, Collective invention, Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 4, 1, 10.1016/0167-2681(83)90023-9 Armstrong, 1977, Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys, Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 396, 10.2307/3150783 Arora, 2001 Arundel, 2001, The relative effectiveness of patents and secrecy for appropriation, Research Policy, 30, 611, 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00100-1 Baldwin, C.Y., Clark, K.B., 2003. The architecture of cooperation: how code architecture mitigates free riding in the open source development model. Working Paper, Harvard Business School. Behlendorf, 1999, Open source as a business strategy, 149 Bessen, J., 2001. Open source software: free provision of complex public goods. Working Paper 5/01. http://www.researchoninnovation.org/opensrc.pdf. Bonaccorsi, A., Rossi, C., 2004. Comparing motivations of individual programmers and firms to take part in the open source movement. From community to business. Working Paper, Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies Pisa. Bouty, 2000, Interpersonal and interaction influences on informal resource exchanges between R&D researchers across organizational boundaries, Academy of Management Journal, 43, 50, 10.2307/1556385 Chesbrough, 2003 Cohen, 2002, R&D spillovers, patents and the incentives to innovate in Japan and the U.S., Research Policy, 31, 1349, 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00068-9 Cohen, W.M., Nelson, R.R., Walsh, J.P., 2000. Protecting their intellectual assets: appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent (or not). NBER Working Paper No. w7552. Cowan, 2003, The dynamics of collective invention, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 52, 513, 10.1016/S0167-2681(03)00091-X Dahl, 2004, Knowledge flows through informal contacts in industrial clusters: myth or reality?, Research Policy, 33, 1673, 10.1016/j.respol.2004.10.004 Dahlander, 2005, Relationships between open source software companies and communities: Observations from Nordic firms, Research Policy, 34, 481, 10.1016/j.respol.2005.02.003 David, P.A., 2005. The economic logic of “open science” and the balance between private property rights and the public domain in scientific data and information: a primer. SIEPR Discussion Paper No. 02-30. Fauchart, E., 2003. On knowledge sharing patterns among rival firms: the case of knowledge on safety. Working Paper. http://userinnovation.mit.edu/papers/safety3.pdf. Feller, 2002 Foray, 2004 Franck, 2003, Reconciling investors and donators—the governance structure of open source, Journal of Management and Governance, 7, 401, 10.1023/A:1026261005092 Franke, 2003, How communities support innovative activities: an exploration of assistance and sharing among end-users, Research Policy, 32, 157, 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00006-9 Franke, 2003, Satisfying heterogeneous user needs via innovation toolkits: the case of Apache security software, Research Policy, 32, 1199, 10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00049-0 Gallini, 2002, Intellectual property: when is it the best incentive system?, vol. 2 Ganssle, 2003 Gruber, 2006, New ventures based on open innovation—an empirical analysis of start-up firms in embedded Linux, International Journal of Technology Management, 33, 356, 10.1504/IJTM.2006.009249 Harabi, 1995, Appropriability of technical innovations—an empirical analysis, Research Policy, 24, 981, 10.1016/0048-7333(94)00812-4 Harhoff, 2003, Profiting from voluntary information spillovers: how users benefit by freely revealing their innovations, Research Policy, 32, 1753, 10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00061-1 Hecker, 1999, Setting up shop: the business of open-source software, IEEE Software, 16, 45, 10.1109/52.744568 Henkel, J., 2003. Open-Source-Aktivitäten von Unternehmen—Innovation in kollektiven Prozessen. Unpublished Habilitation Thesis, University of Munich. Henkel, 2004, Open source software from commercial firms—tools, complements, and collective invention, Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 1 Henkel, J., 2004b. The jukebox mode of innovation—a model of commercial open source development. CEPR Discussion Paper 4507. Henkel, 2005, Welfare implications of user innovation, Journal of Technology Transfer, 30, 73 Hertel, 2003, Motivation of software developers in open source projects: an Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel, Research Policy, 32, 1159, 10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00047-7 Horstmann, 1985, Patents as information transfer mechanisms: to patent or (maybe) not to patent, Journal of Political Economy, 93, 837, 10.1086/261338 Lakhani, 2005, Why hackers do what they do: understanding motivation and effort in free/open source software projects Lamoreaux, 2000, The geography of invention in the American glass industry, Journal of Economic History, 60, 700, 10.1017/S0022050700000309 Lerner, 2002, Some simple economics of open source, Journal of Industrial Economics, 50, 197, 10.1111/1467-6451.00174 Lerner, 2005, The scope of open source licensing, Journal of Law, Economics and Organziation, 21, 20, 10.1093/jleo/ewi002 Levin, 1987, Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 783, 10.2307/2534454 MacCormack, A., Rusnak, J., Baldwin, C., 2004. Exploring the structure of complex software designs: an empirical study of open source and proprietary code. Harvard Business School Working Paper 05-016. Marti, D., 2002. Use binary-only kernel modules, hate life. LinuxJournal.com, 06/19/2002. http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=6152. McGaw, 1987 Meyer, P.B., 2003. Episodes of collective invention. Working Paper 368, Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, http://www.bls.gov/ore/pdf/ec030050.pdf. Morrison, 2000, Determinants of user innovation and innovation sharing in a local market, Management Science, 46, 1513, 10.1287/mnsc.46.12.1513.12076 Nuvolari, A., 2001a. Collective Invention during the British industrial revolution: The case of the Cornish pumping engine. DRUID Working Papers 01-05, Copenhagen Business School. Nuvolari, A., 2001b. Open source software development: some historical perspectives. Working Paper, http://opensource.mit.edu/papers/nuvolari.pdf. Osterloh, M., Rota, S.G., 2004. Open source software development—just another case of collective invention? Working Paper, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID561744_code383702.pdf?abstractid=561744&mirid=1. Osterloh, M., Rota, S., von Wartburg, M., 2001. Open source—new rules in software development. Working Paper Institute for Research in Business Administration, University of Zurich. http://www.ifbf.unizh.ch/orga/downloads/OpenSourceAoM.pdf. Rauscher, 1995, Time-driven development of software in manufactured goods, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12, 186, 10.1111/1540-5885.1230186 Raymond, 1999 Russo, 1985, Technical change and the industrial district: the role of interfirm relations in the growth and transformation of ceramic tile production in Italy, Research Policy, 14, 329, 10.1016/0048-7333(85)90003-4 Sattler, 2003, Appropriability of product innovations: an empirical analysis for Germany, International Journal of Technology Management, 26, 502, 10.1504/IJTM.2003.003420 Schrader, 1991, Informal technology transfer between firms: cooperation through information trading, Research Policy, 20, 153, 10.1016/0048-7333(91)90077-4 Teece, 1986, Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy, Research Policy, 15, 285, 10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2 VDC., 2004. White paper, Venture Development Corporation. Referenced in: Linux now top choice of embedded developers. LinuxDevices.com. http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS2744182736.html. von Hippel, 1987, Cooperation between rivals: informal know-how trading, Research Policy, 16, 291, 10.1016/0048-7333(87)90015-1 von Hippel, 1988 von Hippel, 2001, Innovation by user communities: Learning from open source software, MIT Sloan Management Review, 42, 82 von Hippel, 2003, Open source software and the “Private-Collective” innovation model: Issues for organization science, Organization Science, 14, 209, 10.1287/orsc.14.2.209.14992 Webb, W., 2002. Pick and Place: Linux grabs the embedded market. edn.com. http://www.reed-electronics.com/ednmag/contents/images/253780.pdf. West, 2003, How open is open enough? Melding proprietary and open source platform strategies, Research Policy, 32, 1259, 10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00052-0 Wichmann, T., 2002. FLOSS final report. Part 2. Free/Libre open source software: Survey and study—firms’ open source activities: motivations and policy implications. Berlecon Research. http://www.berlecon.de/studien/downloads/200207FLOSSActivities.pdf.