Dose-dependent change in biomarkers during neoadjuvant endocrine therapy with fulvestrant: results from NEWEST, a randomized Phase II study

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 133 - Trang 237-246 - 2012
Irene Kuter1, Julia M. W. Gee2, Roberto Hegg3, Christian F. Singer4, Rajendra A. Badwe5, Elizabeth S. Lowe6, Ugochi A. Emeribe6, Elizabeth Anderson7, Francisco Sapunar7, Pauline Finlay2, Robert I. Nicholson2, José Bines8, Nadia Harbeck9,10
1Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
2Tenovus Centre for Cancer Research, Welsh School of Pharmacy, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
3School of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo and Hospital Pérola Byington, Sao Paulo, Brazil
4Division of Special Gynaecology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
5Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
6AstraZeneca, Wilmington, USA
7Formerly AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Macclesfield, UK
8Instituto de Câncer, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
9Frauenklinik der Technischen Universität München, Munich, Germany,
10Breast Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany

Tóm tắt

NEWEST (Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Women with Estrogen-Sensitive Tumors) is the first study to compare biological and clinical activity of fulvestrant 500 versus 250 mg in the neoadjuvant breast cancer setting. We hypothesized that fulvestrant 500 mg may be superior to 250 mg in blocking estrogen receptor (ER) signaling and growth. A multicenter, randomized, open-label, Phase II study was performed to compare fulvestrant 500 mg (500 mg/month plus 500 mg on day 14 of month 1) versus fulvestrant 250 mg/month for 16 weeks prior to surgery in postmenopausal women with ER+ locally advanced breast cancer. Core biopsies at baseline, week 4, and surgery were assessed for biomarker changes. Primary endpoint: change in Ki67 labeling index (LI) from baseline to week 4 determined by automated computer imaging system (ACIS). Secondary endpoints: ER protein expression and function; progesterone receptor (PgR) expression; tumor response; tolerability. ER and PgR were examined retrospectively using the H score method. A total of 211 patients were randomized (fulvestrant 500 mg: n = 109; 250 mg: n = 102). At week 4, fulvestrant 500 mg resulted in greater reduction of Ki67 LI and ER expression versus 250 mg (−78.8 vs. −47.4% [p < 0.0001] and −25.0 vs. −13.5% [p = 0.0002], respectively [ACIS]); PgR suppression was not significantly different (−22.7 vs. −17.6; p = 0.5677). However, H score detected even greater suppression of ER (−50.3 vs. −13.7%; p < 0.0001) and greater PgR suppression (−80.5 vs. −46.3%; p = 0.0018) for fulvestrant 500 versus 250 mg. At week 16, tumor response rates were 22.9 and 20.6% for fulvestrant 500 and 250 mg, respectively, with considerable decline in all markers by both ACIS and H score. No detrimental effects on endometrial thickness or bone markers and no new safety concerns were identified. This provides the first evidence of greater biological activity for fulvestrant 500 versus 250 mg in depleting ER expression, function, and growth.

Tài liệu tham khảo