High-stakes literacy tests and local effects in a rural school
Tóm tắt
High-stakes literacy testing is now a ubiquitous educational phenomenon. However, it remains a relatively recent phenomenon in Australia. Hence it is possible to study the ways in which such tests are reorganising educators’ work during this period of change. This paper draws upon Dorothy Smith’s Institutional Ethnography and critical policy analysis to consider this problem and reports on interview data from teachers and the principal in small rural school in a poor area of South Australia. In this context high-stakes testing and the associated diagnostic school review unleashes a chain of actions within the school which ultimately results in educators doubting their professional judgments, increasing the investment in testing, narrowing their teaching of literacy and purchasing levelled reading schemes. The effects of high-stakes testing in disadvantaged schools are identified and discussed.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Alexander, R. (2010, 10 March). The Perils of Policy: Success, Amnesia and Collateral Damage in Systemic Educational Reform. Paper presented at the Miegunyah Distinguished Visiting Fellowship Program 2010 public lecture.
Ball, S. (2001). Performativities and fabrications in the education economy. In D. Gleeson & C. Husbands (Eds.). The performing school: Managing and learning in the performance culture (210-226). London & New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
Ball, S.J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of perform-ativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228.
Berliner, David C. (2013 forthcoming) ‘Sorting out the effects of inequality and poverty, teachers and schooling, on America’s youth’ in S.L. Nichols (Ed.) Educational Policy and the Socialization of Youth for the 21st Century. New York: Teachers College Press.
Blackmore, J. (2004). Restructuring educational leadership in changing contexts: A local / global account of restructuring in Australia. Journal of Educational Change, 5, 267–288.
Codd, J. (2005). Teachers as ‘managed professionals’ in the global education industry: The New Zealand experience. Educational Review 57(2), 193–206.
Comber, B. (2012). Mandated literacy assessment and the reorganisation of teachers’ work: Federal policy and local effects. Critical Studies inEducation. 53(2), 119–136.
Comber, B. (1997). Managerial Discourses: Tracking the local effects on teachers’ and students’ work in literacy lessons. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 18(3), 389–407.
Comber, B. & Cormack, P. (2011). Education policy mediation: Principals’ work with mandated literacy assessment. English in Australia, 46(2), 77–86.
Comber, B. & Hill, S. (2000). Socio-economic Disadvantage, Literacy and Social Justice; Learning from Longitudinal Case Study Research. The Australian Educational Researcher, 27(9), 79–98.
Comber, B. & Kamler, B. (2004). Getting out of deficit: Pedagogies of reconnection. Teaching Education, 25(3), 293–310.
Cormack, P. (2011). Reading pedagogy, ‘evidence’ and education policy: Learning from history. Australian Educational Researcher, 38(2), 133–148.
Green, B. & Letts, W. (2007). Space, equity and rural education: a trialectic account. In K. Gulson & C. Symes (Eds.). Spatial Theories of Education: Policy and Geography Matters (57–76). London: Routledge.
Griffith, A. & Smith, D. (2005). Mothering for schooling. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
Johnston K. & Hayes, K. (2007). Supporting student success at school through teacher professional learning: the pedagogy of disrupting the default modes of schooling. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 11(3), 371–381.
Kostogriz, A. & Doecke, B. (2011). Standards-based accountability: reification, responsibility and the ethical subject. Teaching Education, 22(4), 397–412.
Labaree, D.F. (2011). The lure of statistics for educational researchers. Educational Theory, 61(6), 621–632.
Lingard, B. (2010). Policy borrowing, policy learning: testing times in Australian schooling. Critical Studies in Education, 51(2), 129–147.
Luke, A. (2012). After the testing: Talking and reading and writing the world. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy 56(1), 8–13.
McWilliam, E. & Singh, P. (2004), Safety in numbers? Teacher collegiality in the risk-conscious school. Journal of Educational Inquiry 5(1), 22–33.
Nichols, N. & Griffith, A. (2009). Talk, texts, and educational action: an institutional ethnography of policy in practice. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(2), 241–255.
Poster, M., Lash, S. & Morris, P. (1996). Databases as discourse, or electronic interpellations. In P. Heelas (Ed.). Detraditionalization: Critical Reflections on Authority and Identity (277–293). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
Smith, D. (Ed.) (2006). Institutional ethnography as practice. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Smith, D. (2005). Institutional Ethnography: A sociology for people. Lanham: AltaMira Press.
Smith, D. (1987). The everyday world as problematic: a feminist sociology. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Somerville, M., Plunkett, M. & Dyson, M. (2010). New teachers learning in rural and regional Australia. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 38(1), 39 - 55.
Teese, R. (2000). Academic Success and Social Power: Examinations and Inequality. Carlton South: Melbourne University Press.
Teese, R. & Polesel, J. (2003). Undemocratic Schooling: Equity and Quality in Mass Secondary Education in Australia. Carlton, Vic.: Melbourne University Press.
Thomson, P. (2009). School leadership: Heads on the block. London & New York: Routledge.