Present and future ecological footprint of Slovenia—The influence of energy demand scenarios

Ecological Modelling - Tập 192 - Trang 25-36 - 2006
Sašo Medved1
1University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Askerceva 6, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia

Tài liệu tham khảo

Chambers, 2000 Directive 2002/91/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, 2002. Directive 2001/77/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, 2001. Directive 2003/30/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, 2003. Haberl, 1995, How to calculate and interpret ecological footprints for long period of time: the case of Austria 1926–1995, Ecol. Econ., 38, 25, 10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00152-5 Haberl, 2003, Land-use change and socioeconomics metabolism in Austria. Part II. Land-use scenarios for 2020, LAnd Use Policy, 20, 21, 10.1016/S0264-8377(02)00049-2 IWM, 2002. Institution of Waste Management Environmental Body; City Limits—A Resource Flow and Ecological Footprint Analysis of Great London, http://www.citylimitslondon.com (7.4.2003). Lomborg, 2001 Medved, 2001 2003 Monfreda, 2003 2003 NRDC, 2004. To Good to Throw Away, Natural Resources Defence Council, http://www.nrdc.org (26.9.2003). RP, Redefining Progress; http://www.redefiningprogress.org (26.9.2003). Stöglehner, 2003, Ecological footprint—a tool for assessing sustainable energy supplies, J. Clean. Prod., 11, 267, 10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00046-X 2002 Viridis, 2002. Ecological Footprint Analysis pf Scottish Cities, http://www.scotlands-footprint.com (7.5.2003). Wackernagel, 1996 Wackernagel, 1998, The ecological footprint of Santiago de Chile, Local Environ., 3, 7, 10.1080/13549839808725541 1987 WWF, 2003. The Global Conservation Organization, http://www.panda.org (5.1.2003). Zhao, 2005, A modified method of ecological footprint calculation and its application, Ecol. Model., 185, 65, 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.11.016 Žun, 2004