Explaining the Current Innovative R&D Outsourcing to Developing Countries

Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade - Tập 19 - Trang 211-234 - 2018
Zachary Cohle1
1Department of Economics, Quinnipiac University, Hamden, USA

Tóm tắt

While multinational firms from developed countries have used researchers from emerging areas to assist in the adaption of an existing product, few multinational firms have carried out innovative R&D, or R&D for the creation of a new product, in these areas. Using the threat of imitation and wage differences of researchers across regions, this study proposes a partial equilibrium model to explain the lack of innovative R&D in developing countries. I build a North-South model examining a single firm’s choice of research locations. The model predicts that weak IPR-protection in developing countries does not necessarily explain the lack of Southern research. In some situations, reduced IPR-protection can even increase Southern research. Harsh competition resulting from information leaks coupled with weak IPR-protection can explain much of the lack of innovative research investment in the developing world. My model also predicts that firms with low research needs, or firms in low-tech industries, locate their R&D in the North. Firms with medium research need locate in both countries while the firms with the largest research needs, or firms in high-tech industries, locate research in just the South.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Alacer J, Zhao M (2012) Local R&D strategies and multilocation firms: the role of internal linkages. Manag Sci 58(4):734–753 Antras P, Helpman E (2004) Global sourcing. J Polit Econ 112(3):552–580 Arvanitis S, Hollenstein H (2011) How do different drivers of R&D investment in foreign locations affect domestic firm performance? An analysis based on Swiss Panel micro data. Ind Corp Chang 20(2):605–640 Baik K H (1994) Effort levels in contests with two asymmetric players. South Econ J 61(2):367–378 Baye MR, Hoppe HC (2003) The strategic equivalence of rent-seeking, innovation, and patent-race games. Games Econom Behav 44:217–226 Branstetter L, et al. (2007) Intellectual property rights, imitation, and foreign investment: theory and evidence. National Bureau of Economic Research Canals C, Sener F (2014) Offshoring and intellectual property rights reform. J Dev Econ 108:17–31 Carnahan S, Agarwal R, Campbell BA (2012) Heterogeneity in turnover: the effect of relative compensation dispersion of firms on the mobility and entrepreneurship of extreme performers. Strateg Manag J 33:1411–1430 Chowdhury SM, Sheremeta RM (2011) A generalized Tullock contest. Public Choice 147(3):413–420 Colombo L, et al. (2017) Does easy start-up formation hamper incumbents’ R&D investment? Small Bus Econ 49(3):513–531 Connolly M (2003) The dual nature of trade: measuring its impact on imitation and growth. J Dev Econ 72(1):31–55 d’Aspremont C, Jacquemin A (1988) Cooperative and noncooperative R&D in Duopoly with spillovers. Am Econ Rev 78(5):1133–1137 Demirbag M, Glaister KW (2010) Factors determining offshore location choice for R&D projects: a comparative study of developed and emerging regions. J Manag Stud 47 (8):1534–1560 Dinopoulos E, Segerstrom P (2007) North-South trade and economic growth. Stockholm School of Economics Dinopoulos E, Segerstrom P (2010) Intellectual property rights, multinational firms, and economic growth. J Dev Econ 92:13–27 Ekholm K, Hakkala K (2007) Location of R&D and high-tech production by vertically integrated multinationals. Econ J 117:512–543 Fonseca MA (2009) An experimental investigation of asymmetric contests. Int J Ind Organ 27:582–591 Gambardella A, Ganco M, Honoré F (2014) Using what you know: patented knowledge in incumbent firms and employee entrepreneurship. Organ Sci 26(2):456–474 Ganco M (2013) Cutting the Gordian knot: the effect of knowledge complexity on employee mobility and entrepreneurship. Strateg Manag J 334:666–686 Glass A J, Wu X (2007) Intellectual property rights and quality improvement. J Dev Econ 82:393–415 Grossman GM, Helpman E (2002) Integration vs outsourcing in industry equilibrium. Q J Econ 117(1):85–120 Gustafsson P, Segerstrom P (2011) North-South trade with multinational firms and increasing product variety. Int Econ Rev 52(4):1123–1155 Hall BH, Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M (2001) The NBER patent citation data file: lessons, insights and methodological tools. No. w8498. National Bureau of Economic Research Helpman E (1993) Innovation, imitation, and intellectual property rights. Econometrica 61(6):1247–1280 Hedge D, Hicks D (2008) The maturation of global corporate R&D: evidence from the activity of US foreign subsidiaries. Res Policy 37:390–406 Ito B, Wakasugi R (2007) What factors determine the mode of overseas R&D by multinationals? Empirical evidence. Res Policy 36:1275–1287 Jia H, Skaperdas S, Vaidya S (2013) Contest functions: theoretical foundations and issues in estimation. Int J Ind Organ 31(3):211–222 Kamien M I, Muller E, Zang I (1992) Research joint ventures and R&D Cartels. Am Econ Rev 82(5):1293–1306 Keupp M M, Beckenbauer A, Gassmann O (2009) How managers protect intellectual property rights in China using de facto strategies. R&D Manag 39(2):211–224 Keupp M M, Friesike S, von Zedtwitz M (2012) How do foreign firms patent in emerging economies with weak appropriability regimes? Archetypes and motives. Res Policy 41(8):1422–1439 Lai EL-C, Riezman R, Wang P (2009) Outsourcing of innovation. Econ Theory 38(3):485–515 Leininger W (1993) More efficient rent-seeking: a Munchhausen solution. Public Choice 75(1):43–62 Lewin AY, Massini S, Peeters C (2009) Why are companies offshoring innovation? The emerging global race for talent. J Int Bus Stud 40(6):901–925 Lundin N, Serger S S (2007) Globalization of R&D and China: empirical observations and policy implications. No. 710. IFN Working Paper 710 Melitz MJ (2003) The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica 71(6):1695–1725 Moncada-Paterno-Castello P, Vivarelli M, Voigt P (2011) Drivers and impacts in the globalization of corporate R&D: an introduction based on the European experience. Ind Corp Chang 20(2):583–603 Simon HA (1962) The architecture of complexity. Proc Am Philos Soc 106 (6):467–482 Skaperdas S (1996) Contest success functions. Econ Theory 7(2):283–290 Smith PJ (1999) Are weak patent rights a barrier to US exports? J Int Econ 48 (1):151–177 Sun Y, Du D, Huang L (2006) Foreign R&D in developing countries: empirical evidence from Shanghai, China. China Rev 6(1):67–91 Taylor MS (1993) TRIPS, trade, and technology transfer. Can J Econ 26(2):625–637 Unesco Science Report 2010 Unesco (2011) US BEA (2018) U.S. Direct Investment Abroad, all majority-owned foreign affiliates (data for 2009 and forward), Research and Development Expenditures (accessed November 14) Yang Q, Jiang CX (2007) Location advantages and subsidiaries’ R&D activities in emerging economies: exploring the effect of employee mobility. Asia Pac J Manag 24 (3):341–358 Zhao M (2006) Conducting R&D in countries with weak intellectual property rights protection. Manag Sci 52(8):1185–1199