Introducing an efficient sampling method for national surveys with limited sample sizes: application to a national study to determine quality and cost of healthcare
Tóm tắt
Sampling a small number of participants from an entire country is not straightforward. In this case, researchers reluctantly sample from a single setting or few settings, which limits the generalizability of findings. Therefore, there is a need to design efficient sampling method for small sample size surveys that can produce generalizable results at the country level. Data comprised of twenty proxy variables to measure health services demands, structures, and outcomes of 413 districts of Iran. We used two data mining methods (hierarchical clustering method (HCM) and model-based clustering method (MCM)) to create homogenous groups of districts, i.e., strata based on these variables. We compared the internal and stability validity of the methods by statistical indices. An expert group checked the face validity of the methods, particularly regarding the total number of strata and the combination of districts in each stratum. The efficiency of selected method, which is measured by the inverse of variance, was compared with a simple random sampling (SRS) through simulation. The sampling design was tested in a national study in Iran, which aimed to evaluate the quality and costs of medical care for eight selected diseases by only recruiting 300 participants per disease at the country level. MCM and HCM divided the districts into eight and two clusters, respectively. The measures of internal and stability validity showed that clusters created by MCM were more separated, compact, and stable, thus forming our optimum strata. The probability of death from stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and in-hospital mortality rate were the most important indicators that distinguished the eight strata. Based on the simulation results, MCM increased the efficiency of the sampling design up to 1.7 times compared to SRS. The use of data mining improved the efficiency of sampling up to 1.7 times greater than SRS and markedly reduced the number of strata to eight in the entire country. The proposed sampling design also identified key variables that could be used to classify districts in Iran for sampling from these target populations in the future studies.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Djalalinia S, Modirian M, Sheidaei A, Yoosefi M, Zokaiee H, Damirchilu B, et al. Protocol Design for Large-Scale Cross-Sectional Studies of surveillance of risk factors of non-communicable diseases in Iran: STEPs 2016. Arch Iran Med. 2017;20(9):608–16.
Rashidian A, Karimi-Shahanjarini A, Khosravi A, Elahi E, Beheshtian M, Shakibazadeh E, et al. Iran's multiple Indicator demographic and health survey - 2010: study protocol. Int J Prev Med. 2014;5(5):632–42.
Vahedi S, Yazdi-Feyzabadi V, Amini-Rarani M, Mohammadbeigi A, Khosravi A, Rezapour A. Tracking socio-economic inequalities in healthcare utilization in Iran: a repeated cross-sectional analysis. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):929–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09001-z.
Lohr SL. Sampling: design and analysis: CRC press; 2019. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429296284.
Scheaffer RL, Mendenhall W, Ott RL, Gerow KG. Elementary survey sampling: Cengage learning; 2011.
Khan MGM, Reddy KG, Rao DK. Designing stratified sampling in economic and business surveys. J Appl Stat. 2015;42(10):2080–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2015.1018674.
Kim YJ, Oh Y, Park S, Cho S, Park H. Stratified sampling design based on data mining. Healthcare Informatics Res. 2013;19(3):186–95. https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2013.19.3.186.
Murtagh F. A survey of recent advances in hierarchical clustering algorithms. Comput J. 1983;26(4):354–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/26.4.354.
Scrucca L, Fop M, Murphy TB, Raftery AE. mclust 5: clustering, classification and density estimation using Gaussian finite mixture models. The R journal. 2016;8(1):289–317. https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2016-021.
Suzuki R, Shimodaira H. Pvclust: an R package for assessing the uncertainty in hierarchical clustering. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England). 2006;22(12):1540–2.
Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. 1966. Milbank Q. 2005;83(4):691–729.
Mahdavi M, Vissers J, Elkhuizen S, van Dijk M, Vanhala A, Karampli E, et al. The relationship between context, structure, and processes with outcomes of 6 regional diabetes networks in Europe. PLoS One. 2018;13(2):e0192599. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192599.
Sheidaei A, Gohari K, Kasaeian A, Rezaei N, Mansouri A, Khosravi A, et al. National and subnational patterns of cause of death in Iran 1990-2015: applied methods. Arch Iran Med. 2017;20(1):2–11.
Niakan Kalhori SR, Tayefi B, Noori A, Mearaji M, Rahimzade S, Zandian E, et al. Inpatient data, inevitable need for policy making at national and sub-national levels: a lesson learned from NASBOD. Arch Iran Med. 2014;17(1):16–21.
Etemad K, Yavari P, Mehrabi Y, Haghdoost A, Motlagh ME, Kabir MJ, et al. Inequality in utilization of in-patients health Services in Iran. Int J Prev Med. 2015;6:45.
Ackerman M, Ben-David S. Clusterability: a theoretical study. In: Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. 2009;2009:1–8.
Kassambara A. Practical guide to cluster analysis in R: Unsupervised machine learning, vol. 1: STHDA; 2017.
Mooi E, Sarstedt M. A concise guide to market research: the process, data, and methods using IBM SPSS statistics. New York: Springer; 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12541-6.
Brock G, Pihur V, Datta S, Datta S: clValid, an R package for cluster validation. Journal of Statistical Software (Brock et al, March 2008) 2011.
Kassambara A. Machine learning essentials: practical guide in R: CreateSpace independent publishing platform; 2018.
Torgo L. Data mining with R: learning with case studies: chapman and hall/CRC; 2011. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429292859.
Miller TJ, Skalski JR, Ianelli JN. Optimizing a stratified sampling design when faced with multiple objectives. ICES J Mar Sci. 2007;64(1):97–109. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsl013.
Rana S, Garg R: Application of Hierarchical Clustering Algorithm to Evaluate Students Performance of an Institute. In: 2016 Second International Conference on Computational Intelligence & Communication Technology (CICT): 12–13 Feb. 2016 2016; 2016: 692–697.
Hirano S, Sun X, Tsumoto S. Comparison of clustering methods for clinical databases. Inf Sci. 2004;159(3):155–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2003.03.011.
Yeung KY, Fraley C, Murua A, Raftery AE, Ruzzo WL. Model-based clustering and data transformations for gene expression data. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England). 2001;17(10):977–87.
Chang C, Chen SY, Lan YT. Service quality, trust, and patient satisfaction in interpersonal-based medical service encounters. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13(1):22. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-22.
Aliman NK, Mohamad WN. Linking service quality, patients’ satisfaction and behavioral intentions: an investigation on private healthcare in Malaysia. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2016;224:141–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.419.
Sumaedi S, Yarmen M, Yuda Bakti IGM. Healthcare service quality model: a multi-level approach with empirical evidence from a developing country. Int J Product Perform Manag. 2016;65(8):1007–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-08-2014-0126.