The efficacy of nudge theory strategies in influencing adult dietary behaviour: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMC Public Health - Tập 16 - Trang 1-11 - 2016
Anneliese Arno1, Steve Thomas1
1Centre for Global Health, 7-9 Leinster Street South, Dublin 2, Ireland

Tóm tắt

Obesity has become a world-wide epidemic and is spreading to countries with emerging economies. Previously tested interventions are often too costly to maintain in the long term. This leaves a need for improved strategies for management of the epidemic. Nudge Theory presents a new collection of methods, deemed “nudges”, which have the potential for low-cost and broad application to guide healthier lifestyle choices without the need for restrictive regulation. There has not yet been a large-scale examination of the effectiveness of nudges, despite several policy making bodies now considering their use. To address this gap in knowledge, an adapted systematic review methodology was used to collect and consolidate results from current Nudge papers and to determine whether Nudge strategies are successful in changing adults’ dietary choices for healthier ones. It was found that nudges resulted in an average 15.3 % increase in healthier dietary or nutritional choices, as measured by a change in frequency of healthy choices or a change in overall caloric consumption. All of the included studies were from wealthy nations, with a particular emphasis on the United States with 31 of 42 included experiments. This analysis demonstrates Nudge holds promise as a public health strategy to combat obesity. More research is needed in varied settings, however, and future studies should aim to replicate previous results in more geographically and socioeconomically diverse countries.

Tài liệu tham khảo

OECD. Obesity Update. 2014. Avenell A, et al. Systematic Review of the Long-Term Effects and Economic Consequences of Treatments for Obesity and Implications for Health Improvement. 2004. Forster M, Veerman J, Barendregt J, Vos T. Cost-effectiveness of diet and exercise interventions to reduce overweight and obesity. Int J Obes. 2011;35:1071–8. Thaler RH, Sunstein CR. Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press; 2008. Blumenthal-Barby JS, Burroughs H. Seeking better health care outcomes: the ethics of using the “nudge”. Am J Bioeth. 2012;12:1–10. Goodwin T. Why we should reject ‘nudge’. Politics. 2012;32:85–92. Marteau T. Judging nudging: can nudging improve population health? Br Med J. 2011;342:3. M. Young, The Technical Writer’s Handbook. Mill Valley, CA: University Science, 1989. Hollands G, et al. Altering micro-environments to change population health behaviour: towards an evidence base for choice architecture interventions. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:1218. Green, S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1. 0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration. 2011. US Dept. of Health and Human Services, P.H.S. Healthy People 2000: National Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Objectives-Nutrition Priority Area. Nutr Today. 1990;25:29–39. Mozaffarian D, Hao T, Rimm EB, Willett WC, Hu FB. Changes in diet and lifestyle and long-term weight gain in women and Men. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:2392–404. Norton GNM, Anderson AS, Hetherington MM. Volume and variety: relative effects on food intake. Physiol Behav. 2006;87:714–22. Scott ML, Nowlis SM, Mandel N, Morales AC. The effects of reduced food size and package size on the consumption behavior of restrained and unrestrained eaters. J Consum Res. 2008;35:391–405. Coelho JS, Polivy J, Peter Herman C, Pliner P. Wake up and smell the cookies. Effects of olfactory food-cue exposure in restrained and unrestrained eaters. Appetite. 2009;52:517–20. Dykes J, Brunner E, Martikainen P, Wardle J. Socioeconomic gradient in body size and obesity among women: the role of dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger in the Whitehall II study. Int J Obes. 2003;28:262–8. Neyeloff JL, Fuchs SC, Moreira LB. Meta-analyses and Forest plots using a microsoft excel spreadsheet: step-by-step guide focusing on descriptive data analysis. BMC Res Notes. 2012;5:52. Walsh EM, Kiviniemi MT. Changing how I feel about the food: experimentally manipulated affective associations with fruits change fruit choice behaviors. J Behav Med. 2014;37:322–31. Privitera GJ, Zuraikat FM. Proximity of foods in a competitive food environment influences consumption of a low calorie and a high calorie food. Appetite. 2014;76:175–79. Gittelsohn J, Kim EM, He S, Pardilla M. A Food Store–Based Environmental Intervention Is Associated with Reduced BMI and Improved Psychosocial Factors and Food-Related Behaviors on the Navajo Nation. J Nutr. 2013;143:1494–1500. Kiesel K, Villas-Boas SB. Can information costs affect consumer choice? Nutritional labels in a supermarket experiment. Int J Ind Organ. 2013;31:153–63. Van Kleef E, Shimizu M, Wansink B. Serving bowl selection biases the amount of food served. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2012;44:66–70. Marchiori D, Corneille O, Klein, O. Container size influences snack food intake independently of portion size. Appetite. 2012;58:814–17. Dumanovsky T, Huang CY, Nonas CA, Matte TD, Bassett MT, Silver LD. Changes in energy content of lunchtime purchases from fast food restaurants after introduction of calorie labelling: cross sectional customer surveys. BMJ. 2011;343. Finkelstein EA, Strombotne KL, Chan NL, Krieger J. Mandatory menu labeling in one fast-food chain in King County, Washington. Am J Prev Med. 2011;40:122–27. Hoefkens C, Lachat C, Kolsteren P, Van Camp J, Verbeke W. Posting point-of-purchase nutrition information in university canteens does not influence meal choice and nutrient intake. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;94:562–70. Ogawa Y, Tanabe N, Honda A, Azuma T, Seki N, Suzuki T, Suzuki H. Point-of-purchase health information encourages customers to purchase vegetables: objective analysis by using a point-of-sales system. Environ Health Prev Med. 2011;16:239–46. Pulos E, Leng K. Evaluation of a voluntary menu-labeling program in full-service restaurants. Am J Public Health. 2010;100:1035–39. Roberto CA, Larsen PD, Agnew H, Baik J, Brownell KD. Evaluating the impact of menu labeling on food choices and intake. Am J Public Health. 2010;100:312. Shimizu M, Payne CR, Wansink B. When snacks become meals: How hunger and environmental cues bias food intake. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010;7:63. Wisdom J, Downs JS, Loewenstein G. Promoting healthy choices: Information versus convenience. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics. 2010;164–178. Chu YH, Frongillo EA, Jones SJ, Kaye GL. Improving patrons' meal selections through the use of point-of-selection nutrition labels. Am J Public Health. 2009;99:2001. Gerend MA. Does calorie information promote lower calorie fast food choices among college students? J Adolesc Health. 2009;44:84–86. Kelly MT, Wallace JM, Robson PJ, Rennie KL, Welch RW, Hannon-Fletcher MP, Brennan S, Fletcher A, Livingstone M. Increased portion size leads to a sustained increase in energy intake over 4 d in normal-weight and overweight men and women. British journal of nutrition. 2009;102:470–77. Stroebele N, Ogden LG, Hill JO. Do calorie-controlled portion sizes of snacks reduce energy intake? Appetite. 2009;52:793–96. Ueland Ø, Cardello AV, Merrill EP, Lesher LL. Effect of portion size information on food intake. J Am Diet Assoc. 2009;109:124–27. Viskaal-Van Dongen M, De Graaf C, Siebelink E, Kok FJ. Hidden fat facilitates passive overconsumption. J Nutr. 2009;139:394–99. Bodor JN, Rose D, Farley TA, Swalm C, Scott SK. Neighbourhood fruit and vegetable availability and consumption: the role of small food stores in an urban environment. Public Health Nutr. 2008;11:413–20. Raynor HA, Wing RR. Package unit size and amount of food: do both influence intake? Obesity. 2007;15:2311–19. Rolls BJ, Roe LS, Meengs JS. The effect of large portion sizes on energy intake is sustained for 11 days. Obesity. 2007;15:1535–43. Rolls BJ, Roe LS, Halverson KH, Meengs JS. Using a smaller plate did not reduce energy intake at meals. Appetite. 2007;49:652–60. Antonuk B, Block LG. The Effect of Single Serving Versus Entire Package; 2006. Wansink B, Van Ittersum K, Painter JE. Ice cream illusions: bowls, spoons, and self-served portion sizes. Am J Prev Med. 2006;31:240–43. Hetherington MM, Anderson AS, Norton GN, Newson L. Situational effects on meal intake: A comparison of eating alone and eating with others. Physiol Behav. 2006;88:498–505. Huang A, Barzi F, Huxley R, Denyer G, Rohrlach B, Jayne K, Neal B. The effects on saturated fat purchases of providing internet shoppers with purchase-specific dietary advice: a randomised trial. PLoS clinical trials. 2006;1:e22. Wansink B, Painter JE, North J. Bottomless Bowls: Why Visual Cues of Portion Size May Influence Intake**. Obes Res. 2005;13:93–100. Wansink B, Kim J. Bad popcorn in big buckets: portion size can influence intake as much as taste. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2005;37:242–45. Devitt AA, Mattes RD. Effects of food unit size and energy density on intake in humans. Appetite. 2004;42:213–20. Diliberti N, Bordi PL, Conklin MT, Roe LS, Rolls BJ. Increased portion size leads to increased energy intake in a restaurant meal. Obes Res. 2004;12:562–68. Levitsky DA, Youn T. The more food young adults are served, the more they overeat. J Nutr. 2004;134:2546–549. Rolls BJ, Roe LS, Kral TV, Meengs JS, Wall DE. Increasing the portion size of a packaged snack increases energy intake in men and women. Appetite. 2004;42:63–69. Rolls BJ, Roe LS, Meengs JS, Wall DE. Increasing the portion size of a sandwich increases energy intake. J Am Dietetic Assoc. 2004;104:367–72. Steenhuis I, Van Assema P, Van Breukelen G, Glanz K, Kok G, De Vries H. The impact of educational and environmental interventions in Dutch worksite cafeterias. Health Promotion Int. 2004;19:335–43. Rothstein HR, Sutton AJ, Borenstein M. Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis: Prevention, Assessment and Adjustments. Hoboken: Wiley; 2006.