Causal relationship between nuclear energy consumption and economic growth: A multi-country analysis

Energy Policy - Tập 37 - Trang 1905-1913 - 2009
Seung-Hoon Yoo1, Se-Ju Ku2
1Department of International Area Studies, Hoseo University, 268 Anseo-Dong, Cheonan, Chungnam 330-713, Republic of Korea
2Department of Economics, Korea University, 5-1 Anam-Dong, Sungbuk-Ku, Seoul 136-701, Republic of Korea

Tài liệu tham khảo

Akaike, 1969, Fitting autoregressions for prediction, Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 21, 243, 10.1007/BF02532251 BP, 2008. Statistical Review of World Energy 2008. Available at 〈http://www.bp.com〉. Chiou-Wei, 2008, Economic growth and energy consumption revisited—evidence from linear and nonlinear Granger causality, Energy Economics, 30, 3063, 10.1016/j.eneco.2008.02.002 Engle, 1987, Cointegration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing, Econometrica, 55, 251, 10.2307/1913236 Geweke, 1983, Comparing alternative tests for causality in temporal systems: analytic results and experimental evidence, Journal of Econometrics, 21, 161, 10.1016/0304-4076(83)90012-X Glasure, 1997, Cointegration, error-correction, and the relationship between GDP and energy: the case of South Korea and Singapore, Resource and Energy Economics, 20, 17, 10.1016/S0928-7655(96)00016-4 Granger, 1969, Investigating causal relation by econometric and cross-sectional method, Econometrica, 37, 424, 10.2307/1912791 Grover, 2006, Scenario for growth of electricity in India, Energy Policy, 34, 2834, 10.1016/j.enpol.2005.04.021 Hsiao, 1981, Autoregressive modeling and money-income causality detection, Journal of Monetary Economics, 7, 85, 10.1016/0304-3932(81)90053-2 International Energy Agency, 2008. Key world energy statistics. Available at 〈http://www.iea.org〉. Johansen, 1990, Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration with applications to the demand for money, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52, 169, 10.1111/j.1468-0084.1990.mp52002003.x Masih, 1996, Energy consumption, real income and temporal causality: results from a multi-country study based on cointegration and error-correction modeling techniques, Energy Economics, 18, 165, 10.1016/0140-9883(96)00009-6 Oh, 2004, Causal relationship between energy consumption and GDP revisited: the case of Korea 1970–1990, Energy Economics, 26, 51, 10.1016/S0140-9883(03)00030-6 Pantula, 1994, A comparison of unit-root test criteria, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 12, 449 Pesaran, 1998, Generalised impulse response analysis in linear multivariate models, Economics Letters, 58, 17, 10.1016/S0165-1765(97)00214-0 Phillips, 1988, Testing for a unit root in time series regression, Biometrika, 75, 335, 10.1093/biomet/75.2.335 Schurr, 1983, Energy abundance and economic progress, Annals of Nuclear Energy, 10, 111, 10.1016/0306-4549(83)90072-5 Soytas, 2003, Energy consumption and GDP: causality relationship in G-7 countries and emerging markets, Energy Economics, 25, 33, 10.1016/S0140-9883(02)00009-9 Stern, 1993, Energy and economic growth in the USA: a multivariate approach, Energy Economics, 15, 137, 10.1016/0140-9883(93)90033-N Stern, 2000, A multivariate cointegration analysis of the role of energy in the US macroeconomy, Energy Economics, 22, 267, 10.1016/S0140-9883(99)00028-6 Stock, 1989, Interpreting the evidence in money-income causality, Journal of Econometrics, 40, 161, 10.1016/0304-4076(89)90035-3 Toda, 1993, Vector autoregressions and causality, Econometrica, 61, 1367, 10.2307/2951647 Toth, 2006, Oil and nuclear power: past, present, and future, Energy Economics, 28, 1, 10.1016/j.eneco.2005.03.004 Wolde-Rufael, 2006, Electricity consumption and economic growth: a time series experience for 17 African countries, Energy Policy, 34, 1106, 10.1016/j.enpol.2004.10.008 World Bank, 2007. World Development Indicators on CD-ROM, Washington, DC. Yoo, 2005, Electricity consumption and economic growth: evidence from Korea, Energy Policy, 33, 1627, 10.1016/j.enpol.2004.02.002 Yoo, 2005, Nuclear energy consumption and economic growth in Korea, Progress in Nuclear Energy, 46, 101, 10.1016/j.pnucene.2005.01.001