Assessing risk of bias in prevalence studies: modification of an existing tool and evidence of interrater agreement
Tài liệu tham khảo
Fox, 2005, Evidence of evidence-based health policy: the politics of systematic reviews in coverage decisions, Health Aff (Millwood), 24, 114, 10.1377/hlthaff.24.1.114
Lavis, 2005, Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-making, J Health Serv Res Policy, 10, 35, 10.1258/1355819054308549
Higgins J, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0.: The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available at www.cochrane-handbook.org; Accessed August 24, 2011.
Katrak, 2004, A systematic review of the content of critical appraisal tools, BMC Med Res Methodol, 4, 1, 10.1186/1471-2288-4-22
Mallen, 2006, Quality assessment of observational studies is not commonplace in systematic reviews, J Clin Epidemiol, 59, 765, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.12.010
Shamliyan, 2010, A systematic review of tools used to assess the quality of observational studies that examine incidence or prevalence and risk factors for diseases, J Clin Epidemiol, 63, 1061, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.014
Hoy, 2010, Measuring the global burden of low back pain, Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol, 24, 155, 10.1016/j.berh.2009.11.002
Leboeuf-Yde, 1995, The prevalence of low back pain in the literature. A structured review of 26 Nordic studies from 1954 to 1993, Spine, 20, 2112, 10.1097/00007632-199510000-00009
Walker, 2000, The prevalence of low back pain: a systematic review of the literature from 1966 to 1998, J Spinal Disord, 13, 205, 10.1097/00002517-200006000-00003
Dionne, 2006, Does back pain prevalence really decrease with increasing age? A systematic review, Age Ageing, 35, 229, 10.1093/ageing/afj055
Louw, 2007, The prevalence of low back pain in Africa: a systematic review, BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 8, 1, 10.1186/1471-2474-8-1
Deeks, 2003, Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies, Health Technol Assess, 7, 1, 10.3310/hta7270
Downs, 1998, The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions, J Epidemiol Community Health, 52, 377, 10.1136/jech.52.6.377
Wells, 2008
Khan, 2001
Loney, 1999, The prevalence of low back pain in adults: a methodological review of the literature, Phys Ther, 79, 384, 10.1093/ptj/79.4.384
2007
Feinstein, 2002
Landis, 1977, The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data, Biometrics, 33, 159, 10.2307/2529310
Cohen, 1968, Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit, Psychol Bull, 70, 213, 10.1037/h0026256
Statacorp. STATA 10.1. TX.2009. http://www.stata.com/.
Terracciano, 2010, GRADE system: new paradigm, Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol, 10, 377, 10.1097/ACI.0b013e32833c148b
von Elm, 2007, The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies, Ann Intern Med, 147, 573, 10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010
Tooth, 2005, Quality of reporting of observational longitudinal research, Am J Epidemiol, 161, 280, 10.1093/aje/kwi042
Fejer, 2006, The prevalence of neck pain in the world population: a systematic critical review of the literature, Eur Spine J, 15, 834, 10.1007/s00586-004-0864-4
Maxwell, 2006, Method guidelines for Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group systematic reviews, J Rheumatol, 33, 2304
Stroup, 2000, Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group, JAMA, 283, 2008, 10.1001/jama.283.15.2008
Shamliyan, 2011, Development quality criteria to evaluate nontherapeutic studies of incidence, prevalence, or risk factors of chronic diseases: pilot study of new checklists, J Clin Epidemiol, 64, 637, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.08.006