Older adults’ perceptions of contexts surrounding their social participation in a digitalized society—an exploration in rural communities in Northern Sweden

Caroline Fischl1, Nina Lindelöf2, Helena Lindgren3, Ingeborg Nilsson1
1Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Occupational Therapy, Umeå University, 901 87, Umeå, Sweden
2Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
3Department of Computing Science, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden

Tóm tắt

AbstractSocial participation and digital engagement can contribute to health and well-being among older adults. Because of older adults’ decline in abilities, coupled with complex technology and its perceived insufficient relevance to daily life, there is a need to create and tailor social opportunities and services that are supported by digital technologies for older adults to continue participating in society. Thus, it becomes relevant to explore older adults’ perceptions about contexts surrounding their social participation in a digital society. This exploration used a qualitative research design with focus group interviews and qualitative content analysis. Eighteen older adults, aged 66–81 years, from rural communities in Northern Sweden, participated in this study. The analysis resulted in three categories: experiencing conditions for social participation in a state of flux, perceiving drawbacks of urbanization on social participation, and welcoming digital technology that facilitates daily and community living. These categories were encapsulated in the theme—the juxtaposition of narrowing offline social networks and expanding digital opportunities for social participation. The findings suggested that co-creating usable digitalized services and facilitating satisfactory use of digital technologies could support older adults’ social participation through activities that they find relevant in their lives, and subsequently, might enable them to live longer at home.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Aw S, Koh G, Oh Y, Wong M, Vrijhoef HM, Harding S, Hildon ZL et al (2017) Explaining the continuum of social participation among older adults in Singapore: from ‘closed doors’ to active ageing in multi-ethnic community settings. J Aging Stud 42:46–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2017.07.002

Barnes LL, de Leon CFM, Bienias JL, Evans DA (2004) A longitudinal study of black–white differences in social resources. J Gerontol Soc Sci 59B:S146–S152

Bergström A (2017) Digital equality and the uptake of digital applications among seniors of different age. Nord Rev 38:79–91

Carstensen LL, Isaacowitz DM, Charles ST (1999) Taking time seriously: a theory of socioemotional selectivity. Am Psychol 54(3):165–181

Carstensen L, Fung H, Charles S (2003) Socioemotional selectivity theory and the regulation of emotion in the second half of life. Motiv Emot 27(2):103–123. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024569803230

Chen K, Chan AHS (2014) Gerontechnology acceptance by elderly Hong Kong Chinese: a senior technology acceptance model (STAM). Ergonomics 57(5):635–652. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2014.895855

Conway F, Magai C, Jones S, Fiori K, Gillespie M (2013) A six-year follow-up study of social network changes among African-American, Caribbean, and U.S.-Born Caucasian urban older adults. Int J Aging Hum Dev 76:1–27

Dahlin-Ivanoff S, Hultberg J (2006) Understanding the multiple realities of everyday life: basic assumptions in focus group methodology. Scand J Occup Ther 13:125–132

Davidsson P, Thoresson A (2017) Svenskarna och internet 2017. https://www.iis.se/fakta/svenskarna-och-internet-2017/. Accessed 6 Apr 2018

Davidsson P, Palm M, Mandre ÅM (2018) Svenskarna och internet 2018. https://2018.svenskarnaochinternet.se. Accessed 8 Oct 2018

Digitaliseringskommissionen (2016) För digitalisering i tiden (SOU 2016:89). Elanders Sverige AB, Stockholm. http://www.regeringen.se/4af25c/contentassets/f7d07b214e2c459eb5757cea206e6701/sou-2016_89_webb.pdf. Accessed 30 Nov 2018

Doody O, Slevin E, Taggart L (2013a) Focus group interviews in nursing research: part 1. Brit J Nurs 22(1):16–19

Doody O, Slevin E, Taggart L (2013b) Focus group interviews. Part 3: analysis. Brit J Nurs 22(5):266–269

Doody O, Slevin E, Taggart L (2013c) Preparing for and conducting focus groups in nursing research: part 2. Brit J Nurs 22(3):170–173

Fischl C, Asaba E, Nilsson I (2017) Exploring potential in participation mediated by digital technology among older adults. J Occup Sci 24(3):314–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2017.1340905

Graneheim UH, Lundman B (2004) Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today 24(2):105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001

Graneheim UH, Lindgren B-M, Lundman B (2017) Methodological challenges in qualitative content analysis: a discussion paper. Nurse Educ Today 56:29–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.06.002

Ihm J, Hsieh YP (2015) The implications of information and communication technology use for the social well-being of older adults. Inf Commun Soc 18(10):1123–1138. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1019912

Internetstiftelsen (2019) Svenskarna och internet 2019. https://svenskarnaochinternet.se/rapporter/svenskarna-och-internet-2019/. Accessed 4 Dec 2019

Jivraj S, Nazroo J, Barnes M (2016) Short- and long-term determinants of social detachment in later life. Ageing Soc 36(5):924–945. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X14001561

Kammerer K, Falk K, Herzog A, Fuchs J (2019) How to reach ‘hard-to-reach’ older people for research: the TIBaR model of recruitment. Survey methods: insights from the field. https://surveyinsights.org/?p=11822. Accessed 24 Jun 2019

Larsson E, Larsson-Lund M, Nilsson I (2013) Internet based activities (IBAs): seniors’ experiences of the conditions required for the performance of and the influence of these conditions on their own participation in society. Educ Gerontol 39(3):155–167

Leist AK (2013) Social media use of older adults: a mini-review. Gerontol Regen Technol Sect 59:378–384

Levasseur M, Richard L, Gauvin L, Raymond É (2010) Inventory and analysis of definitions of social participation found in the aging literature: proposed taxonomy of social activities. Soc Sci Med 71(12):2141–2149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.09.041

Martinson M, Minkler M (2006) Civic engagement and older adults: a critical perspective. Gerontologist 46:318–324

Näsi M, Räsänen P, Sarpila O (2012) ICT activity in later life: internet use and leisure activities amongst senior citizens in Finland. Soc Behav Health Perspect 9(2):169–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-011-0210-8

Olphert W, Damodaran L (2013) Older people and digital disengagement: a fourth digital divide? Gerontology 59(6):564–570. https://doi.org/10.1159/000353630

Ragnedda M (2017) The third digital divide: a Weberian approach to digital inequalities. Routledge, London

Regeringskansliet (2017) För ett hållbart digitaliserat Sverige—en digitaliseringsstrategi (N2017/03643/D). http://www.regeringen.se/informationsmaterial/2017/05/for-ett-hallbart-digitaliserat-sverige—en-digitaliseringsstrategi/. Accessed 30 Nov 2018

Reichstadt J, Depp C, Palinkas L, Jeste D (2007) Building blocks of successful aging: a focus group study of older adults’ perceived contributors to successful aging. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 15(3):194–201. https://doi.org/10.1097/JGP.0b013e318030255f

Sandelowski M, Leeman J (2012) Writing usable qualitative health research findings. Qual Health Res 22(10):1404–1413. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732312450368

Schwartz E, Litwin H (2018) Social network changes among older Europeans: the role of gender. Eur J Ageing 15:359–367

Selwyn N (2006) Digital division or digital decision? A study of non-users and low-users of computers. Poetics 34(4):273–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2006.05.003

Skjutar A, Schult M-L, Christensson K, Müllersdorf M (2010) Indicators of need for occupational therapy in patients with chronic pain: occupational therapists’ focus groups. Occup Ther Int 17:93–103. https://doi.org/10.1002/oti.282

Statistics Sweden (2012) Swedish standard classification of occupations. https://www.scb.se/en/finding-statistics/statistics-by-subject-area/other/other/other-publications-non-statistical/pong/publications/swedish-standard-classification-of-occupations-2012/. Accessed 16 Apr 2019

Stewart DW, Shamdasani PN, Rook DW (2007) Focus groups: theory and practice. Sage, Thousand Oaks

Twigg J (2007) Clothing, age and the body: a critical review. Ageing Soc 27:285–305

United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (2012) International Standard Classification of Education ISCED 2011. UNESCO Institute for Statistics, Montreal, QC, Canada. http://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/international-standard-classification-of-education-isced-2011-en.pdf. Accessed 16 Apr 2019

Vogelsang E (2016) Older adult social participation and its relationship with health: rural–urban differences. Health Place 42:111–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2016.09.010

Winterton R, Clune S, Warburton J, Martin J (2014) Local governance responses to social inclusion for older rural Victorians: building resources, opportunities and capabilities. Australas J Ageing 33:E8–E12

World Health Assembly (2018) Seventy-first world health assembly—agenda item 12.4 digital health (WHA71.7). http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA71/A71_R7-en.pdf?ua=1. Accessed 7 Jan 2019

World Health Organization (2002) Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health: ICF. World Health Organization, Geneva. https://www.who.int/classifications/icf/icfbeginnersguide.pdf?ua=1. Accessed 24 Jun 2019

World Health Organization (2015) World report on ageing and health. WHO Press, Geneva. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/186463/1/9789240694811_eng.pdf?ua=1. Accessed 21 Aug 2017