Striatal contributions to working memory: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in humans

European Journal of Neuroscience - Tập 19 Số 3 - Trang 755-760 - 2004
Simon J.G. Lewis1,2, Anja Dove3, Trevor W. Robbins4, Roger A. Barker1,2, Adrian M. Owen3
1Cambridge Centre for Brain Repair, Forvie Site, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 2PY, UK
2Department of Neurology, University of Cambridge, UK
3Medical Research Council, Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK
4Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, UK

Tóm tắt

Abstract

Although the role of the frontal cortex in executive performance has been widely accepted, issues regarding the contribution of subcortical structures to these functions remain unresolved. In this study, the neural circuitry underlying selective subcomponents of working memory was investigated using event‐related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Ten healthy volunteers performed a verbal memory task, which allowed different aspects of working memory function such as maintenance, retrieval and manipulation to be tested within the same general paradigm. During performance of this task as a whole, fMRI revealed increases in signal intensity throughout the frontostriatal network. However, when signal intensity during the manipulation of information within working memory was compared to that during periods requiring only simple maintenance and retrieval, significant changes were observed only in the caudate nuclei, bilaterally. These results suggest an essential and specific role for the caudate nucleus in executive function, which may underlie the cognitive disturbances observed in frontostriatal neurodegenerative disorders such as Parkinson's disease.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1146/annurev.ne.09.030186.002041

10.1136/jnnp.52.11.1228

10.1006/nimg.2001.0845

Cohen S.M., 1972, Electrical stimulation of cortical‐caudate pairs during delayed successive visual discrimination in monkeys, Acta Neurobiol. Exp. (Warsz.), 32, 211

10.1093/brain/114.5.2095

10.1016/0028-3932(93)90149-T

10.1006/nimg.2002.1092

10.1016/S0926-6410(98)00004-4

10.1006/brcg.1999.1096

10.1037/h0024348

10.1016/0028-3932(89)90128-0

10.1006/nimg.1997.0306

10.1002/hbm.460020402

Fuster J.M., 1997, The Prefrontal Cortex

10.1016/0006-8993(72)90274-0

Goldman‐Rakic P.S., 1987, Handbook of Physiology, 373

10.1007/978-3-642-85007-3_7

10.1111/j.1749-6632.1995.tb38132.x

10.1093/brain/111.2.299

Holmes A.P., 1997, Statistical modelling of low frequency confounds in fMRI, Neuroimage, 5, S480

10.1002/mrm.1910340111

10.1038/363623a0

10.1007/s00221-002-1332-1

10.1093/brain/119.5.1633

10.1093/brain/121.7.1343

10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00041-4

10.1093/brain/106.2.257

10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00257-9

10.1016/S0304-3940(98)00928-8

10.1006/brcg.1999.1099

10.1016/S0165-0173(99)00040-5

10.1136/jnnp.51.6.757

10.1111/j.1460-9568.1997.tb01487.x

10.1007/s002210000398

10.1016/0028-3932(93)90135-M

10.1111/j.1460-9568.1996.tb01219.x

10.1016/S0028-3932(96)00101-7

10.1093/brain/115.6.1727

10.1093/brain/119.5.1597

10.1073/pnas.95.13.7721

10.1162/089892999563652

10.1016/S0926-6410(99)00010-5

Postle B.R., 1997, Spatial, but not object, delayed response is impaired in early Parkinson's disease, Neuropsychology, 11, 171, 10.1037/0894-4105.11.2.171

10.1037/h0027294

10.1093/brain/109.5.845

10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1996)4:1<58::AID-HBM4>3.0.CO;2-O