Comparison of geochemical parameters derived from comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography with time-of-flight mass spectrometry and conventional gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

Science China Earth Sciences - Tập 54 - Trang 1892-1901 - 2011
HuiTong Wang1,2,3, Na Weng1,2, ShuiChang Zhang1,2,3, GuangYou Zhu1,2,3, CaiYun Wei1,2
1Petroleum Geology Research and Laboratory Center, Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, PetroChina, Beijing, China
2Key Laboratory of Petroleum Geochemistry of PetroChina, Beijing, China
3State Key Laboratory of Enhanced Oil Recovery, RIPED, PetroChina, Beijing, China

Tóm tắt

The saturated and aromatic hydrocarbon fractions of crude oil samples have been analyzed by using comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography with time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC×GC-TOFMS) and conventional gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). In order to investigate the consistency and discrepancy of the obtained data from the two instruments, some petroleum geochemical parameters have been compared. A comparison of 23 geochemical parameters indicates that 10 parameters are comparable from the two instruments with less than 5% deviations. Therefore, GC×GC-TOFMS is equivalent to conventional GC-MS in some geochemical parameter acquisitions. However, the other 13 parameters are discrepant, including gammacerane / αβ-hopane, Ts/Tm, 2-ethyl-naphthalene / 1-ethyl-naphthalene (ENR), (2, 6-dimethyl-naphthalene +2,7-dimethyl-naphthalene) / 1,5-dimethyl-naphthalene (DNR), etc. Furthermore, compared to GC×GC-TOFMS, some low concentration compounds could not be detected by the conventional GC-MS, which results in the missing of related geochemical data. Normally, this is caused by the limited separation power and peak capacity of the conventional GC column. Besides, the co-eluting peak integrations are also affected significantly due to the incomplete separation of the compounds. Some low concentration compounds might not be detected because of the interference from the baseline noise or from other substances. GC×GC-TOFMS prevails in compound separation against the conventional GC-MS by avoiding co-elution, which achieves more accurate and precise peak area measurement with the presence of a true baseline. So petroleum geochemical parameters obtained from the GC×GC-TOFMS are more reliable than those from the conventional GC-MS. GC×GC-TOFMS may become one of the most effective analytical tools for the oil and gas geochemical study.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Zhou G J. Analytical instruments and application research in petroleum geology experiments (in Chinese). Petrol Instrum, 1998, 12: 1–6 Phillips J B, Beens J. Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography: A hyphenated method with strong coupling between the two dimensions. J Chromatogr A, 1999, 856: 331–347 Peters K E, Moldowan J M. The Biomarker Guide: Interpreting Molecular Fossils in Petroleum and Ancient Sediments. Translated by Jiang N H, Zhang S C, Lin Y H, et al. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 1995 Schomburg G. Two-dimensional gas chromatography: Principles, instrumentation, methods. J Chromatogr A, 1995, 703: 309–325 Beens J, Tijssen R, Blomberg J. Prediction of comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatographic separations: A theoretical and practical exercise. J Chromatogr A, 1998, 822: 233–251 Beens J, Brinkman Udo A Th. The role of gas chromatography in compositional analyses in the petroleum industry. Trends Anal Chem, 2000, 19: 260–275 Mühlen von C, Zini C A, Caramão E B, et al. Applications of comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography to the characterization of petrochemical and related samples. J Chromatogr A, 2006,1105: 39–50 Wang H T, Weng N, Zhang S C, et al. Characteristics and identification of saturated hydrocarbons by comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography coupled to time-of-flight mass spectrometry (in Chinese). J Chin Mass Spectrom Soc, 2010, 31: 18–27 Wang H T, Weng N, Zhang S C, et al. Identification of petroleum aromatic fraction by comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography with time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Chin Sci Bull, 2010, 55: 2039–2045 Blumberg L M. Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography: Metrics, potentials, limits. J Chromatogr A, 2003, 985: 29–38 Adahchour M, Beens J, Vreuls R J J, et al. Recent developments in comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC×GC) I. Introduction and instrumental set-up. Trends Anal Chem, 2006, 25: 438–454 Adahchour M, Beens J, Vreuls R J J, et al. Recent developments in comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC×GC) II. Modulation and detection. Trends Anal Chem, 2006, 25: 540–553 Frysinger G S, Gaines R B, Xu L, et al. Resolving the unresolved complex mixture in petroleum-contaminated sediments. Environ Sci Technol, 2003, 37: 1653–1662 Ventura G T, Kenig F, Reddy C M, et al. Analysis of unresolved complex mixtures of hydrocarbons extracted from Late Archean sediments by comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC×GC). Org Geochem, 2008, 39: 846–867 Zhao B, Shen X J. The development of TOFMS analysis technique (in Chinese). Mod Sci Instrum, 2006, 4: 30–33 Blumberg L M, David F, Klee M S, et al. Comparison of one-dimensional and comprehensive two-dimensional separations by gas chromatography. J Chromatogr A, 2008, 1188: 2–16 Schoenmakers P J, Oomen J L M M, Blomberg J, et al. Comparison of comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry for the characterization of complex hydrocarbon mixtures. J Chromatogr A, 2000, 892: 29–46 Zhu S K, Lu X, Xing J, et al. Comparison of comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography/time-of-fight mass spectrometry and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry for the analysis of tobacco essential oils. Anal Chim Acta, 2005, 545: 224–231 Wang H T, W ei C Y, Song F Q, et al. Separation of saturated and aromatic hydrocarbon using fine silica gel (in Chinese). Pet Geol Exp, 2009, 31: 312–314 Jiang N H, Huang D F, Song F Q, et al. Distribution characteristics of aromatics in formations under different sedimentary environments (in Chinese). Acta Pet Sin, 1994, 15: 42–50 Continual Education of Exploration and Development Institute in Wuxi Base, SINPPEC. Analysis Technological and Application in Petroleum Geology (in Chinese). Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2006 Xu H X, Chen L H, Wang Y J, et al. The Application and Testing Technology on Petroleum Geological Experiments (in Chinese). Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2001 Aboul-Kassim T A T, Simoneit B R T. Petroleum hydrocarbon fingerprinting and sediment transport assessed by molecular biomarker and multivariate statistical analyses in the Eastern Harbour of Alexandria, Egypt. Mar Pollut Bull, 1995, 30: 63–73 Zhu Y M, Zhang H B, Fu J M, et al. Aromatic hydrocarbons distribution and composition of various modes of origin oils from Tarim Basin (in Chinese). Acta Pet Sin, 1998, 19: 33–37 Li M J, Wang T G. The generating mechanism of methylated naphthalene series in crude oils and the application of their maturity parameters (in Chinese). Petrol Geol Exp, 2005, 27: 606–623 Scotchman I C, Griffith C E, Holmes A J, et al. The Jurassic petroleum system north and west of Britain: A geochemical oil-source correlation study. Org Geochem, 1998, 29: 671–700 Wei Z B, Moldowan J M, Zhang S C, et al. Diamondoid hydrocarbons as a molecular proxy for thermal maturity and oil cracking: Geochemical models from hydrous pyrolysis. Org Geochem, 2007, 38: 227–249 Vendeuvre C, Bertoncini F, Duval L, et al. Comparison of conventional gas chromatography and comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography for the detailed analysis of petrochemical samples. J Chromatogr A, 2004, 1056: 155–162