Understanding and Using the Implicit Association Test: II. Method Variables and Construct Validity

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin - Tập 31 Số 2 - Trang 166-180 - 2005
Brian A. Nosek1, Anthony G. Greenwald2, Mahzarin R. Banaji3
1Department of Psychology, University of Virginia, Box 400400, Charlottesville, VA 22911, USA.
2University of Washington
3Harvard University

Tóm tắt

The Implicit Association Test (IAT) assesses relative strengths of four associations involving two pairs of contrasted concepts (e.g., male-female and family-career). In four studies, analyses of data from 11 Web IATs, averaging 12,000 respondents per data set, supported the following conclusions: (a) sorting IAT trials into subsets does not yield conceptually distinct measures; (b) valid IAT measures can be produced using as few as two items to represent each concept; (c) there are conditions for which the administration order of IAT and self-report measures does not alter psychometric properties of either measure; and (d) a known extraneous effect of IAT task block order was sharply reduced by using extra practice trials. Together, these analyses provide additional construct validation for the IAT and suggest practical guidelines to users of the IAT.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00708.x

Banaji, M. R., 2001, The nature of remembering: Essays in honor of Robert G. Crowder, 117

Banaji, M. R., 2004, Implicit racial identity, attitude, and self-esteem

Bargh, J. A., 1997, Advances in social cognition, 1

10.1207/S15327957PSPR0603_8

10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.828

10.1037/0022-3514.79.4.631

10.1037/h0046016

Cohen, J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences

10.1177/0146167204264654

10.1111/1467-9280.00328

10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.800

10.1006/jesp.2000.1464

10.1026//1618-3169.50.2.77

10.1016/S0005-7967(99)00180-1

Fazio, R. H., 1995, Attitude strength, 247

10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.229

10.1037/0021-843X.110.2.282

10.1016/j.jesp.2003.07.002

10.1037/0033-295X.102.1.4

10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.1022

10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464

Greenwald, A. G., 2001, Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 85, 10.1026//0949-3946.48.2.85

10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197

Hofmann, W., 2004, A meta-analysis on the correlation between the Implicit Association Test and explicit self-report measures

Klauer, K. C., 2004, Task-set inertia, attitude accessibility, and compatibility-order effects: New evidence for a task-set switching account of the IAT effect

Kraut, R., 2004, American Psychologist, 59, 105, 10.1037/0003-066X.59.2.105

10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.842

10.1521/soco.20.6.483.22977

10.1037/0022-3514.85.6.1180

10.1037/0096-3445.132.3.455

Nosek, B. A., 2004, Moderators of the relationship between implicit and explicit attitudes

10.1521/soco.19.6.625.20886

10.1111/1540-4560.00254

10.1037/1089-2699.6.1.101

Nosek, B. A., 2004, Implicit and explicit attitudes are related but distinct constructs

10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.139

Schmukle, S. C., European Journal of Personality

Schwarz, N., 1998, The handbook of social psychology, 4, 143

Steffens, M. C., 2001, Zeitschrift Fuer Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 123

10.1037/0033-295X.107.1.101