The development of a quality appraisal tool for studies of diagnostic reliability (QAREL)

Verhagen, 1998, The Delphi list: a criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi consensus, J Clin Epidemiol, 51, 1235, 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00131-0 Jadad, 1996, Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?, Control Clin Trials, 17, 1, 10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4 Moher, 1995, Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: an annotated bibliography of scales and checklists, Control Clin Trials, 16, 62, 10.1016/0197-2456(94)00031-W Sherrington, 2000, PEDro. A database of randomized trials and systematic reviews in physiotherapy, Man Ther, 5, 223, 10.1054/math.2000.0372 Deeks, 2001, Systematic reviews in health care: systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests, BMJ, 323, 157, 10.1136/bmj.323.7305.157 Deville, 2002, Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines, BMC Med Res Methodol, 2, 9, 10.1186/1471-2288-2-9 Dinnes, 2005, A methodological review of how heterogeneity has been examined in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy, Health Technol Assess, 9, 1, 10.3310/hta9120 Feinstein, 2002, Misguided efforts and future challenges for research on “diagnostic tests”, J Epidemiol Community Health, 56, 330, 10.1136/jech.56.5.330 Fritz, 2001, Examining diagnostic tests: an evidence-based perspective, Phys Ther, 81, 1546, 10.1093/ptj/81.9.1546 Irwig, 1995, Meta-analytic methods for diagnostic test accuracy, J Clin Epidemiol, 48, 119, 10.1016/0895-4356(94)00099-C Irwig, 1994, Guidelines for meta-analyses evaluating diagnostic tests, Ann Intern Med, 120, 667, 10.7326/0003-4819-120-8-199404150-00008 ter Riet, 2001, Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests. Two issues were simplified, BMJ, 323, 1188, 10.1136/bmj.323.7322.1188a Whiting, 2005, No role for quality scores in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies, BMC Med Res Methodol, 5, 19, 10.1186/1471-2288-5-19 Whiting, 2004, Development and validation of methods for assessing the quality of diagnostic accuracy studies, Health Technol Assess, 8, 1, 10.3310/hta8250 Whiting, 2003, The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews, BMC Med Res Methodol, 3, 25, 10.1186/1471-2288-3-25 Whiting, 2006, Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies, BMC Med Res Methodol, 6, 9, 10.1186/1471-2288-6-9 Bossuyt, 2003, Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative, Ann Intern Med, 138, 40, 10.7326/0003-4819-138-1-200301070-00010 Bossuyt, 2003, The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration, Ann Intern Med, 138, W1, 10.7326/0003-4819-138-1-200301070-00012-w1 Gemmell, 2005, Interexaminer reliability of multidimensional examination regimens used for detecting spinal manipulable lesions: a systematic review, Clin Chiropract, 8, 199, 10.1016/j.clch.2005.09.002 Hestboek, 2000, Are chiropractic tests for the lumbo-pelvic spine reliable and valid? A systematic critical literature review, J Manipulative Physiol Ther, 23, 258, 10.1067/mmt.2000.106097 Hollerwoger, 2006, Methodological quality and outcomes of studies addressing manual cervical spine examinations: a review, Man Ther, 11, 93, 10.1016/j.math.2005.12.001 May, 2006, Reliability of procedures used in the physical examination of non-specific low back pain: a systematic review, Aust J Physiother, 52, 91, 10.1016/S0004-9514(06)70044-7 Seffinger, 2004, Reliability of spinal palpation for diagnosis of back and neck pain: a systematic review of the literature, Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 29, E413, 10.1097/01.brs.0000141178.98157.8e Stochkendahl, 2006, Manual examination of the spine: a systematic critical literature review of reproducibility, J Manipulative Physiol Ther, 29, 475, 10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.06.011 Van Trijffel, 2005, Inter-examiner reliability of passive assessment of intervertebral motion in the cervical and lumbar spine: a systematic review, Man Ther, 10, 256, 10.1016/j.math.2005.04.008 Colle, 2002, Impact of quality scales on levels of evidence inferred from a systematic review of exercise therapy and low back pain, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 83, 1745, 10.1053/apmr.2002.35657 Juni, 1999, The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis, JAMA, 282, 1054, 10.1001/jama.282.11.1054 2008, Assessing risk of bias in included studies Herbison, 2006, Adjustment of meta-analyses on the basis of quality scores should be abandoned, J Clin Epidemiol, 59, 1249, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.008