From hotspots to site protection: Identifying Marine Protected Areas for seabirds around the globe

Biological Conservation - Tập 156 - Trang 5-14 - 2012
Ben G. Lascelles1, Gary M. Langham2, Robert A. Ronconi3, James B. Reid4
1Global Seabird Programme, BirdLife International, Wellbrook Court, Girton Road, Cambridge CB3 0NA, UK
2National Audubon Society, 1150 Connecticut Ave., Suite 600, Washington, DC 20036, United States
3Department of Biology, Dalhousie University, 1355 Oxford Street, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 4J1
4Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Inverdee House, Baxter Street, Aberdeen AB11 9QA, UK

Tài liệu tham khảo

Adams, J., MacLeod, C., Suryan, R.M., Hyrenbach, K.D., Harvey, J.T., this issue. Summer-time Use of West Coast US National Marine Sanctuaries by Migrating Sooty Shearwaters (Puffinus griseus). Biological Conservation. Agardy, 1994, Advances in marine conservation: the role of MPAs, Trends Ecol. Evol., 9, 267, 10.1016/0169-5347(94)90297-6 Agardy, 2011, Mind the gap: addressing the shortcomings of MPAs through large scale marine spatial planning, Marine Policy, 35, 226, 10.1016/j.marpol.2010.10.006 Anderson, 2011, A review of global seabird bycatch in longline fisheries, Endangered Species Res., 14, 91, 10.3354/esr00347 Arcos, J.M., Bécares, J., Rodríguez, B., Ruiz, A., 2009. Áreas importantes para la conservación de las aves marinas en España. Sociedad Española de Ornitología (SEO/BirdLife), Madrid. Ardron, 2008, Marine spatial planning in the high seas, Marine Policy, 32, 832, 10.1016/j.marpol.2008.03.018 Avasthi, 2005, California tries to connect its scattered marine reserves, Science, 305, 487, 10.1126/science.308.5721.487 Ballance, L.T., Pitman, R.L., 1999. Foraging ecology of tropical seabirds. In: Adams, N.J., Slotow, R.H. (Eds.), Proc. 22 Int. Ornithol. Congr., Durban: 2057–2071. BirdLife South Africa, Johannesburg. Ballard, G., Jongsomjit, D., Veloz, S.D., Ainley, D., this issue. Coexistence of mesopredators in an intact polar ocean ecosystem: the basis for defining a Ross Sea marine protected area. Biological Conservation. Ban, 2009, Minimum data requirements for designing a set of MPAs, using commonly available abiotic and biotic datasets, Biodivers. Conserv., 18, 1829, 10.1007/s10531-008-9560-8 Bancroft, T., Canfield, C., Driscoll, M., Kavits, P., Reid, B., Ringer, D.J., 2010. Oil and Birds: Too Close for Comfort. National Audubon Society Special Report, 28 pp. Barraquand, 2008, Animal movements in heterogeneous landscapes: identifying profitable places and homogeneous movement bouts, Ecology, 89, 3336, 10.1890/08-0162.1 Benhamou, 2004, How to reliably estimate the tortousity of an animal’s path: straightness, sinuosity or fractal dimension?, J. Theor. Biol., 229, 209, 10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.03.016 BirdLife International, 2004. Tracking Ocean Wanderers: The Global Distribution of Albatrosses and Petrels. Results from the Global Procellariiform Tracking Workshop, 1–5 September, 2003, Gordon‘s Bay, South Africa. BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK. BirdLife International, 2008 BirdLife International, 2009 BirdLife International, 2009b. Using Seabird Satellite Tracking Data to Identify Marine IBAs: A Workshop to Determine How to Achieve This Goal. Held 1st–3rd July 2009. CNRS, Chize, France. BirdLife International, 2010a. The BirdLife Checklist of the Birds of the World, with Conservation Status and Taxonomic Sources. Version 3. <www.birdlife.org>. BirdLife International, 2010 Botsford, L.W., Micheli, F., Parma, A.M., 2006. Biological and Ecological Considerations in the Design, Implementation and Success of MPAs. Report for the FAO Workshop on the Role of MPAs in Fisheries Management 12–14 June 2006, FAO Summary Dated 4 July 2006. Brooks, 2001, Conservation priorities for birds and biodiversity: do East African Important Bird Areas represent species diversity in other terrestrial vertebrate groups?, Ostrich, 15, 3 Burger, 2008, Application of tracking and data-logging technology in research and conservation of seabirds, Auk, 125, 253, 10.1525/auk.2008.1408 Butchart, 2004, Measuring global trends in the status of biodiversity: red list indices for birds, PLoS Biol., 2, 2294, 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020383 Campagna, 2007, A species approach to marine ecosystem conservation, Aquat. Conserv.: Mar. Freshwater Ecosyst., 17, S122, 10.1002/aqc.918 Camphuysen, 2004, Recording foraging seabirds at sea: standardised recording and coding of foraging behaviour and multi-species foraging associations, Atlantic Seabirds, 6, 1 Camphuysen, K.C.J., Fox, T.A.D., Leopold, M.M.F., Petersen, I.K., 2004. Towards Standardised Seabirds at-Sea Census Techniques in Connection with Environmental Impact Assessments for Offshore Wind Farms in the UK: A Comparison of Ship and Aerial Sampling Methods for Marine Birds, and Their Applicability to Offshore Wind Farm Assessments. Report Commissioned by COWRIE. Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research. Camphuysen, C.J., Shamoun-Baranes, J., Bouten, W., Garthe, S., this issue. Identifying offshore marine areas of ecological importance for seabirds using combined techniques: ship-based transects and seabird-borne data loggers. Biological Conservation. California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG), 2004 Chambers, 2011, Observed and predicted effects of climate on Australian seabirds, Emu, 111, 235, 10.1071/MU10033 Chaurand, 1994, The regular alternation of short and long foraging trips in the Blue Petrel Halobaena caerulea: a previously undescribed strategy of food provisioning in a pelagic seabird, J. Anim. Ecol., 63, 275, 10.2307/5546 Craig, 2005, Protecting international marine biodiversity: international treaties and national systems of MPAs, J. Land Use, 20, 337 Crawford, 2007, Food, fishing and seabirds in the Benguela upwelling system, J. Ornithol., 148, 253, 10.1007/s10336-007-0228-z Derous, 2007, A concept for biological valuation in the marine environment, Oceanologia, 49, 99 Ehler, C., Douvere, F., 2009. Marine Spatial Planning: A Step-by-Step Approach Toward Ecosystem-based Management. Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission and Man and the Biosphere Programme. IOC Manual and Guides No. 53, ICAM Dossier No. 6. UNESCO, Paris. Einoder, 2009, A review of the use of seabirds as indicators in fisheries and ecosystem management, Fish. Res., 95, 6, 10.1016/j.fishres.2008.09.024 Ervin, J., Mulongoy, K.J., Lawrence, K., Game, E., Sheppard, D., Bridgewater, P., Bennett, G., Gidda, S.B., Bos, P., 2010. Making Protected Areas Relevant: A Guide to Integrating Protected Areas into Wider Landscapes, Seascapes and Sectoral Plans and Strategies. CBD Technical Series No. 44. Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, Canada. EU, 2009. Council Directive 2009/147/EC of 30 November 2009 on the Conservation of Wild Birds. Official Journal of the European Union L 20/7 (26.1.2010). 2009 FAO, 2010. MPAs as a Tool for Fisheries Management. FI Project Websites. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department, Rome. French Global Environment Facility (FGEF), 2010. MPAs – Review of FGEF’s Cofinanced Project Experiences. Assessment Carried out by Thierry Clément, Catherine Gabrie, Jean Roger Mercier and Héloïse You. Study Coordinated by Julien CALAS. Flint, 1991, Time and energy limits to the foraging radius of Sooty Tern Sterna fuscata, Ibis, 133, 43, 10.1111/j.1474-919X.1991.tb04808.x Forero, 2004, High trophic overlap within the seabird community of Argentinean Patagonia: a multiscale approach, J. Anim. Ecol., 73, 789, 10.1111/j.0021-8790.2004.00852.x Fox, 1997, Spring habitat use and feeding behaviour of Steller’s Eider Polysticta stelleri in Varangerfjord, northern Norway, Ibis, 139, 52, 10.1111/j.1474-919X.1997.tb04671.x Freeman, K., 2003. Distribution of Highly Migratory Marine Mammals and Seabirds in the Eastern North Pacific: Are Existing MPAs in the Right Place? Masters Project Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Master of Environmental Management degree in the Nicholas School of the Environment and Earth Sciences of Duke University. Furness, 1997, Seabirds as monitors of the marine environment, Journal of Marine Science, 54, 726 Game, 2009, Pelagic Protected Areas: the missing dimension in ocean conservation, Trends Ecol. Evol., 24, 360, 10.1016/j.tree.2009.01.011 Garthe, S., Markones, N., Mendel, B., Sonntag, N., Krause, J.C., this issue. Protected areas for seabirds in German offshore waters: designation, retrospective consideration and current perspectives. Biological Conservation. Gilliland, 2008, Key elements and steps in the process of developing ecosystem-based marine spatial planning, Marine Policy, 32, 787, 10.1016/j.marpol.2008.03.022 Gjerde, K.M., Dotinga, H., Hart, S., Molenaar, E.J., Rayfuse, R., Warner, R., 2008. Options for Addressing Regulatory and Governance Gaps in the International Regime for the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biodiversity in Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, x +20. González-Solís, 2007, Offshore spatial segregation in giant petrels Macronectes spp.: differences between species, sexes and seasons, Aquat. Conserv.: Mar. Freshwater Ecosyt., 17, 22, 10.1002/aqc.911 Grant, S.M., Tratalos, J., Trathan, P.N., 2008. Proposed approach for the identification of important marine areas for conservation: using ‘MARXAN’ software to support systematic conservation planning. In: Prepared for the CCAMLR Working Group on Ecosystem Monitoring and Management (WG-EMM), 14 July–1 August 2008, Moscow, Russia. Grecian, W.J., Witt, M.J., Attrill, M.J., Bearhop, S., Godley, B.J., Grémillet, D., Hamer, K.C., Votier, S.C., this issue. A novel projection technique to identify important at-sea areas for seabird conservation: an example using Northern Gannets breeding in the North East Atlantic. Biological Conservation. Halpin, 2006, OBIS-SEAMAP: developing a biogeographic research data commons for the ecological studies of marine mammals, seabirds, and sea turtles, MEPS, 316, 239, 10.3354/meps316239 Harding, 2005 Harris, 2007, A major increase in snake pipefish (Entelurus aequoreus) in northern European seas since 2003: potential implications for seabird breeding success, Mar. Biol., 151, 973, 10.1007/s00227-006-0534-7 Harrison, 1992, The laws and treaties of North Pacific rim nations that protect seabirds on land and at sea, Colonial Waterbirds, 15, 264, 10.2307/1521466 Hart, 2003 Hart, 2009, Satellite telemetry of marine megavertebrates: the coming of age of an experimental science, Endangered Species Res., 10, 9, 10.3354/esr00238 Hazlitt, 2010, The effects of including marine ecological values in terrestrial reserve planning for a forest-nesting seabird, Biol. Conserv., 143, 1203, 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.01.026 Hebshi, 2008, Associations between seabirds and sub-surface predators around Oahu, Hawaii, Aquat. Biol., 4, 89, 10.3354/ab00098 Hegel, T.M., Cushman, S.A., Evans, J., Huettmann, F., 2010. Current state of the art for statistical modelling of species distributions. In: Cushman, S.A., Huettmann, F. (Eds.), Spatial Complexity, Informatics, and Wildlife Conservation, Part II, pp. 273–311. Hoffman, 1981, The ecology of seabird feeding flocks in Alaska, Auk, 98, 437 Hooker, 2004, Marine reserves as a tool for ecosystem-based management: the potential importance of megafauna, Bioscience, 54, 27, 10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0027:MRAATF]2.0.CO;2 Horne, 2007, Analyzing animal movements using Brownian bridges, Ecology, 88, 2354, 10.1890/06-0957.1 Hyrenbach, 2000, MPAs and ocean basin management, Aquat. Conserv.: Mar. Freshwater Ecosyst., 10, 437, 10.1002/1099-0755(200011/12)10:6<437::AID-AQC425>3.0.CO;2-Q Hyrenbach, 2006, Seabird associations with meso scale eddies: the subtropical Indian Ocean, MEPS, 324, 271, 10.3354/meps324271 Kappes, 2010, Hawaiian albatrosses track interannual variability of marine habitats in the North Pacific, Prog. Oceanogr., 86, 246, 10.1016/j.pocean.2010.04.012 Kelleher, G., 1999. Guidelines for MPAs. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK, xxiv +107pp. Kelleher, G., Gjerde, K., 2003. High Seas MPAs. IUCN Parks, vol. 15, no. 3. Kimball, L.A., 2005. The International Legal Regime of the High Seas and the Seabed Beyond the Limits of National Jurisdiction and Options for Cooperation for the Establishment of MPAs (in Marine Areas Beyond the Limits of National Jurisdiction. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, Technical Series No. 19, 64pages. Klages, 1997, Diet of the Atlantic Petrel Pterodroma incerta during breeding at South Atlantic Gough Island, Mar. Ornithol., 25, 13 Kober, K., Webb, A., Win, I., Lewis, M., O’Brien, S., Wilson, L.J, Reid, J.B., 2010. An Analysis of the Numbers and Distribution of Seabirds within the British Fishery Limit Aimed at Identifying Areas that Qualify as Possible Marine SPAs, JNCC Report 431, ISSN:0963–8091. Ladd, 2005, Hydrographic features and seabird foraging in Aleutian passes, Fish. Oceanogr., 14, 178, 10.1111/j.1365-2419.2005.00374.x Laneri, 2010, Trawling regime influences longline seabird bycatch in the Mediterranean: new insights from a small-scale fishery, MEPS, 420, 241, 10.3354/meps08847 Le Corre, M., Jaeger, A., Pinet, P., Kappes, M., Weimerskirch, H., Catry, T., Ramos, J., Russell, J., Shah, N., Jaquemet, S., this issue. Tracking seabirds to identify potential Marine Protected Areas in the tropical western Indian Ocean. Biological Conservation. Loos, S.A., Canessa, R.R., 2010. Towards a GIS-based methodology for MPA zoning. In: Green, D.R. (Ed.) Coastal and Marine Geospatial Technologies, vol. 13, pp. 245–254. Lopez-Mendilaharsu, 2009, Insights on Leatherback Turtle movements and high use areas in southwest Atlantic Ocean, J. Exp. Mar. Biol., 378, 31, 10.1016/j.jembe.2009.07.010 Louzao, 2006, Oceanographic habitat of an endangered Mediterranean Procellariiform: implications for MPAs, Ecol. Appl., 16, 1683, 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1683:OHOAEM]2.0.CO;2 Louzao, 2009, Combining vessel-based surveys and tracking data to identify key marine areas for seabirds, MEPS, 391, 183, 10.3354/meps08124 Louzao, 2011, Conserving pelagic habitats: seascape modelling of an oceanic top predator, J. Appl. Ecol., 48, 121, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01910.x Ludynia, K., Kemper, J., Roux, J.-P., this issue. The Namibian Islands’ Marine Protected Area: using seabird tracking data to define boundaries and assess their adequacy. Biological Conservation. MacLeod, 2008, A comparison of approaches to modelling the occurrence of marine animals, Hydrobiologia, 612, 21, 10.1007/s10750-008-9491-0 Manosa, 2004, Activity patterns and foraging behaviour of Audouin’s Gull at the Ebro Delta, NW Mediterranean, Sci. Mar., 68, 605, 10.3989/scimar.2004.68n4605 McChesney, G.J., 2008. Evaluations of Benefits to Seabirds and Waterfowl from Proposed MPAs and Special Closures in the North Central Coast Study Region. California MLPA Master Plan Science Advisory Team (April 2). McSorley, C.A., Dean, B.J., Webb, A., Reid, J.B., 2006. Extending the boundaries of seabird breeding colony Protected Areas into the marine environment. In: Boere, G.C., Galbraith, C.A., Stroud, D.A. (Eds.), Waterbirds Around the World. The Stationery Office, Edinburgh, UK, pp. 752–753. 2001 Miller, 2011, Summary of the fourth meeting of the working group on marine biodiversity beyond areas of national jurisdiction: 31 May–3 June 2011, Earth Negotiations Bull., 25 Montevecchi, W.A., Hedd, A., Tranquilla, L.M., Fifield, D.A., Burke, C.M., Regular, P.M., Davoren, G.K., Garthe, S., Gaston, A.J., Robertson, G.J., Phillips, R.A., this issue. Tracking seabirds to identify ecologically important and high risk marine areas. Biological Conservation. Mora, 2011, Ongoing global biodiversity loss and the need to move beyond Protected Areas: a review of the technical and practical shortcomings of Protected Areas on land and sea, MEPS, 434, 251, 10.3354/meps09214 Morling, 2005, The economic rationale for MPAs in the High Seas, Parks, 15, 24 Nur, 2011, Where the wild things are: predicting hotspots of seabird aggregations in the California Current System, Ecol. Appl., 21, 2241, 10.1890/10-1460.1 O’Brien, S., Webb, A., Brewer, M.J., Reid, J.B., this issue. Use of kernel density estimation and maximum curvature to set Marine Protected Area boundaries: identifying a Special Protection Area for wintering red-throated divers in the UK. Biological Conservation. Oppel, S., Meirinho, A., Ramírez, I., Gardner, B., O’Connell, A., Miller, P.I., Louzao, M., this issue. Comparison of five modelling techniques to predict the spatial distribution and abundance of seabirds. Biological Conservation. Parsons, 2008, Seabirds as indicators of the marine environment, ICES J. Mar. Sci., 65, 1520, 10.1093/icesjms/fsn155 Patterson, 2008, State–space models of individual animal movement, Trends Ecol. Evol., 23, 87, 10.1016/j.tree.2007.10.009 Paxinos, 2008, Marine spatial planning: ecosystem-based zoning methodology for marine management in South Australia, J. Conserv. Plann., 4, 37 Phillips, 2004, Accuracy of geolocation estimates for flying seabirds, MEPS, 266, 265, 10.3354/meps266265 Pichegru, 2010, Marine no-take zone rapidly benefits endangered penguin, Biol. Lett., 6, 498, 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0913 Pichegru, L., Ryan, P.G., Eeden, R.V., Reid, T., Gremillet, D., Wanless, R., this issue. Industrial fishing, no-take zones and endangered penguins. Biological Conservation. Pinaud, 2005, Scale-dependant habitat use in a long-ranging central place predator, J. Anim. Ecol., 74, 852, 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2005.00984.x Plasman, 2008, Implementing marine spatial planning: a policy perspective, Mar. Policy, 32, 811, 10.1016/j.marpol.2008.03.016 Pomeroy, 2008, The engagement of stakeholders in the Marine Spatial Planning process, Mar. Policy, 32, 816, 10.1016/j.marpol.2008.03.017 Ramírez, I., Geraldes, P., Meirinho, A., Amorim, P., Paiva, V., 2008. Áreas importantes para as aves marinhas em Portugal (Importnat Areas for Seabirds in Portugal). Projecto LIFE04 NAT/PT/000213 – Sociedade Portuguesa Para o Estudo das Aves, Lisboa. Reid, 1998, The European seabirds at sea database, Biol. Cons. Fauna, 102, 291 Ruckelshaus, 2008, Marine ecosystem-based management in practice. Scientific and governance challenges, Bioscience, 58, 53, 10.1641/B580110 Ryan, 2008, Seabirds indicate changes in the composition of plastic litter in the Atlantic and south-western Indian Oceans, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 56, 1406, 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2008.05.004 Salm, R.V., Clark, J., Siirla, E., 2000. Marine and Coastal Protected Areas: A Guide for Planners and Managers. IUCN – The World Conservation Union, Washington, DC, xxi +371pp. Samonte, 2010 Sarewitz, 2006, Liberating science from politics, Am. Sci., 94, 104, 10.1511/2006.2.104 Scovazzi, S., 2003. MPAs on the High Seas: some legal and policy considerations. In: Paper Presented at the World Parks Congress, Governance Session “Protecting Marine Biodiversity beyond National Jurisdiction”, Durban, South Africa (11 September 2003). Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, 2004. Technical Advice on the Establishment and Management of a National System of Marine and Coastal Protected Areas, SCBD, 40pages (CBD Technical Series No. 13). Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, 2009 Sherman, 1999, An ecosystem approach to global assessment and management of coastal waters, MEPS, 190, 271, 10.3354/meps190271 Skov, 2007, A quantitative method for evaluating the importance of marine areas for conservation of birds, Biol. Conserv., 136, 362, 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.12.016 Smith, 2009, Developing best practice for using Marxan to locate MPAs in European waters, ICES J. Mar. Sci., 66, 188, 10.1093/icesjms/fsn198 Spear, 2008, The seabird community of the Peru Current, 1980–1995, with comparisons to other eastern boundary currents, Mar. Ornithol., 36, 125 Springer, 1996, Sea birds as proxies of marine habitats and food webs in the western Aleutian arc, Fish. Oceanogr., 5, 45, 10.1111/j.1365-2419.1996.tb00016.x Suman, 1999, Perceptions and attitudes regarding marine reserves: a comparison of stakeholder groups in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary, Ocean Coast. Manage., 42, 1019, 10.1016/S0964-5691(99)00062-9 Sydeman, 2007, Seabirds as indicators of marine ecosystems, Mar. Ecol. Process. Ser., 352, 199, 10.3354/meps07070 Thaxter, C., Lascelles, B., Sugar, K., Cook, A.S., Roos, S., Bolton, M., Langston, R., Burton, N.H., this issue. Seabird foraging ranges as a preliminary tool for identifying candidate MPAs. Biological Conservation. Thompson, 2007, Air-breathing visitors to seamounts: importance of seamounts to seabirds, 244 Toropova, C., Meliane, I., Laffoley, D., Matthews, E., Spalding, M. (Eds.), 2010. Global Ocean Protection: Present Status and Future Possibilities. Brest, France. Agence des aires marines protégées, Gland, Switzerland, Washington, DC and New York, USA: IUCN WCPA, Cambridge, UK: UNEP-WCMC, Arlington, USA: TNC, Tokyo, Japan: UNU, New York, USA: WCS, 96pp. Tremblay, 2007, Fractal landscape method: an alternative approach to measuring area-restricted searching behaviour, J. Exp. Biol., 210, 935, 10.1242/jeb.02710 Tremblay, 2009, Analytical approaches to investigating seabird-environment interactions: a review, MEPS, 391, 153, 10.3354/meps08146 Tushabe, 2006, A nationwide assessment of the biodiversity value of Uganda‘s Important Bird Areas network, Conserv. Biol., 20, 85, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00318.x UNEP, 2011. Taking Steps Toward Marine and Coastal Ecosystem-based Management: An Introductory Guide. UNEP Regional Seas Reports and Studies No. 189. UNESCO, 2009. Global Open Oceans and Deep Seabed (GOODS) – Biogeographic Classification. UNESCO-IOC. IOC Technical Series, 84, Paris. United Nations, 2002. Report of the World Summit on Sustainable Development. Johannesburg, South Africa, 26 August–4 September 2002. United Nations, New York. Valavanis, 2008, Modelling of essential fish habitat based on remote sensing, spatial analysis and GIS, Hydrobiologia, 612, 5, 10.1007/s10750-008-9493-y Van Franeker, 2002, Responses of seabirds, in particular prions (Pachyptila sp.), to small-scale processes in the Antarctic Polar Front, Deep-Sea Res. II, 49, 3931, 10.1016/S0967-0645(02)00118-2 Velando, 2005, Short-term indirect effects of the Prestige oil spill on European Shag: changes in availability of prey, MEPS, 302, 263, 10.3354/meps302263 Vucetich, 2003, Spatial patterns of demography and genetic processes across the species’ range: null hypotheses for landscape conservation genetics, Conserv. Genet., 4, 639, 10.1023/A:1025671831349 Wakefield, 2009, Quantifying habitat use and preferences of pelagic seabirds using individual movement data: a review, MEPS, 391, 165, 10.3354/meps08203 Webb, A., Durinck, J., 1992. Counting birds from ships. In: Komdeur, J., Bertelsen, J., Cracknell, G. (Eds.), Manual for Aeroplane and Ship Surveys of Waterfowl and Seabirds. International Waterfowl and Wetlands Research Bureau, Slimbridge. IWRB Special Publication 19, pp. 24–37. Webb, A., McSorley, C.A., Dean, B.J., Reid, J.B., Cranswick, P.A., Smith, L., Hall, C., 2004. An Assessment of the Numbers and Distributions of Inshore Aggregations of Waterbirds Using Liverpool Bay During the Non-breeding Season in Support of Possible SPA Identification. JNCC Report No. 373. Weimerskirch, 1997, Alternative foraging strategies and resource allocation by male and female Wandering Albatross, Ecology, 78, 2051, 10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[2051:AFSARA]2.0.CO;2 Wood, 2008, Assessing progress towards global marine protection targets: shortfalls in information and action, Oryx, 42, 340, 10.1017/S003060530800046X Zydelis, R., Lewison, R.L., Shaffer, S.A., Moore, J.E., Boustany, A.M., Roberts, J.J., Sims M., Dunn, D.C., Best, B.D., Tremblay, Y., Kappes, M.A., Halpin, P.N., Costa, D.P., Crowder L.B., 2011. Dynamic Habitat Models: Using Telemetry Data to Project Fisheries Bycatch. Published Online Before Print March 23, 2011. Proceeding of Royal Society of Biological Sciences. doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.0330.