A meta-analysis of contingent valuation forest studies

Adamowicz, 2004, An assessment of the impacts of forest management on aboriginal hunters: evidence from stated and revealed preference data, Forest Science, 50, 139 Adams, 2008, The use of contingent valuation for evaluating protected areas in the developing world: economic valuation of Morro do Diabo State Park, Atlantic Rainforest, Sao Paulo State (Brazil), Ecological Economics, 66, 359, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.09.008 Amirnejad, 2006, Estimating the existence value of North forests of Iran by using a contingent valuation method, Ecological Economics, 58, 665, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.08.015 Arrow, K., Solow, R., Portney, P.R., Leamer, E., Radner, R., Schuman, H.E., 1993. Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. Federal Registrer 58, 4601–4614. Bateman, 2003, Contrasting conventional with multi-level modeling approaches to meta-analysis: expectation consistency in U.K. Woodland Recreation Values, Land Economics, 79, 235, 10.2307/3146869 Bateman, 1999, Developing a methodology for benefit transfers using geographical information systems: modeling demand for woodland Recreation, Regional Studies, 33, 191, 10.1080/00343409950082391 Bateman, 2002 Bernath, 2008, Recreational benefits of urban forest: explaining visitors' willingness to pay in the context of the theory of planned behavior, Journal Environmental Management, 89, 155, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.01.059 Bijmolt, 2001, Meta-analysis in marketing when studies contain multiple measurements, Marketing Letters, 12, 157, 10.1023/A:1011117103381 Bostedt, 1991, vol. 141 Boyle, 1994, What do we know about groundwater values? Preliminary implications from a meta analysis of contingent valuation studies, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 76, 1055, 10.2307/1243391 Brander, 2006, The empirics of wetland valuation: a comprehensive summary and a meta-analysis of the literature, Environmental and Resource Economics, 33, 223, 10.1007/s10640-005-3104-4 Brander, 2007, The recreational value of coral reefs: a meta-analysis, Ecological Economics, 68, 209, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.11.002 Brent, 1998 Brey, 2007, Estimation of forest values using choice modeling: an application to Spanish forests, Ecological Economics, 64, 305, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.006 Broberg, 2007, vol. 712 Brouwer, R., Langford, I., Bateman, I., Crowards, T. and Turner, R., 1997. A meta-analysis of wetland contingent valuation studies. Global Environmental Change Working Paper No. 97-20, Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment (CSERGE), University of East Anglia, Norwich, and University College, London. Brouwer, 1999, A meta-analysis of wetland contingent valuation studies, Regional Environmental Change, 1, 47, 10.1007/s101130050007 Carson, 2001, Contingent valuation: controversies and evidence, Environmental and Resource Economics, 19, 173, 10.1023/A:1011128332243 Champ, 2006, Is willingness to pay for a public good sensitive to the elicition format?, Land Economics, 82, 162, 10.3368/le.82.2.162 Daily, 1997 Duthy, 2002, Whian Whian-state forest or national park: community attitudes and economic values, Economics Analysis and Policy, 32, 91, 10.1016/S0313-5926(02)50020-5 2006, Global Forest Resources Assessment 2005 Ghermandi, 2008, The economic value of wetland conservation and creation: a meta-analysis Glass, 1981 Gregory, 2000, Valuing environmental policy options: a case study comparison of multiattribute and contingent valuation survey methods, Land Economics, 76, 151, 10.2307/3147222 Gujarati, 2003 Gürlük, 2006, The estimation of ecosystem services' value in the region of Misi rural development project: results from a contingent valuation survey, Forest Policy and Economics, 9, 209, 10.1016/j.forpol.2005.07.007 Hadker, 1997, Willingness-to-pay for Borivli National Park: evidence from a contingent valuation, Ecological Economics, 21, 105, 10.1016/S0921-8009(96)00094-8 Haefele, 1992, Estimating the Total Value of Forest Quality in High-Elevation Spruce-Fir Forests Hoen, 1993, Multiple use forestry and preservation of coniferous forests in Norway, Scandinavian Journal Forest Resource, 8, 266, 10.1080/02827589309382776 Hoen, H.F., Veisten, K., 1994. En undersøkelse blant brukere av Oslomarka: synspunkter på skogtilstand og skogbehandling (A survey of the users of Oslomarka: attitudes towards forest scenary and forestry practices). Skogforsk 6/94. Horowitz, 2002, A review of WTA/WTP studies, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 44, 426, 10.1006/jeem.2001.1215 Horton, 2003, Evaluating non-user willingness to pay for a large-scale conservation programme in Amazonia: aUK/Italian contingent valuation study, Environmental Conservation, 30, 139, 10.1017/S0376892903000122 Hung, 2007, Comparing money and labour payment in contingent valuation: the case of forest fire prevention in Vietnamese context, Journal of International Development, 19, 173, 10.1002/jid.1294 Hutchinson, 1999, Combining preferences ordering and contingent valuation methods to assess non market benefit of alternative afforestation projects, Journal of Rural Studies, 15, 103, 10.1016/S0743-0167(98)00016-3 James, 1994, Application of environmental economics to sustainable management of the forests of South-East Australia, The Annals of Regional Science, 28, 77, 10.1007/BF01581349 2000 Kennedy, 2003 Kleiber, 2001, Valuation of Recreational Benefits and Visitor Conflicts in an Urban Forest Kniivilä, 2002, Costs and benefits of forest conservation: regional and local comparisons in Eastern Finland, Journal Forest Economics, 8, 131, 10.1078/1104-6899-00008 Köhlin, 2001, Contingent valuation in project planning and evaluation: the case of social forestry in Orissa, India, Environmental and Development Economics, 6, 237, 10.1017/S1355770X01000134 Kramer, 1997, Valuing a global environmental good: U.S. residents' willingness to pay to protect tropical rain forests, Land Economics, 73, 196, 10.2307/3147282 Krieger, 2001 Kwak, 2003, Estimating the public's value for urban forest in the Seoul Metropolitan Area of Korea: a contingent valuation study, Urban Studies, 40, 2207, 10.1080/0042098032000123259 Lehtonen, 2003, Non market benefits of forest conservation in southern Finland, Environmental Science and Policy, 6, 195, 10.1016/S1462-9011(03)00035-2 Lindhjem, 2007, 20 Years of stated preference valuation of non-timber benefits from Fennoscandian Forests: a meta-analysis, Journal of Forest Economics, 12, 251, 10.1016/j.jfe.2006.09.003 Lockwood, 1993, A contingent valuation survey and benefit–cost analysis of forest preservation in East Gippsland, Australia, Journal of Environmental Management, 38, 233, 10.1006/jema.1993.1042 Loomis, 1996, Economic benefits of rare and endangered species: summary and meta-analysis, Ecological Economics, 18, 197, 10.1016/0921-8009(96)00029-8 Loomis, 1993, Some empirical evidence of embedding effects in contingent valuation of forest protection, Journal of Environmental, Economics and Management, 24, 45, 10.1006/jeem.1993.1025 Loomis, 1996, A Contingent Valuation Study of the Value of Reducing Fire Hazards to Old-Growth Forests in the Pacific Northwest Mäntymaa, 2002, Estimating the demand for biodiversity-vagueness band and open ended questions Mattsson, 1993, The non-timber value of Northern Swedish forests — an economic-analysis, Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 8, 426, 10.1080/02827589309382789 Mattsson, 1994, How do different forest management-practices affect the non-timber value of forests? — An economic-analysis, Journal of Environmental Management, 41, 79, 10.1006/jema.1994.1035 Mill, 2007, Preferences for multiple use forest management in Ireland: citizen and consumer perspectives, Ecological Economics, 60, 642, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.02.005 Moeltner, 2007, Meta-analysis and benefit transfer for resource valuation—addressing classical challenges with Bayesian modeling, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 53, 250, 10.1016/j.jeem.2006.08.004 Noonan, 2003, Contingent valuation and cultural resources: a meta-analytic review of the literature, Journal of Cultural Economics, 27, 159, 10.1023/A:1026371110799 Ojea, E., Loureiro, M.L., 2009. The Measurement of the Size Changes in CVM Studies: Does it Matter for Scope Tests? Bask Centre for Climate Change, mimeo. Pouta, 2005, Sensitivity to scope of environmental regulation in contingent valuation of forest cutting practices in Finland, Forest Policy and Economics, 7, 539, 10.1016/j.forpol.2003.09.002 Quiggin, 1998, Individual and household willingness to pay for public goods, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80, 58, 10.2307/3180268 Reaves, 1999, Does question format matter? Valuing an endangered species, Environmental and Resource Economics, 14, 365, 10.1023/A:1008320621720 Richardson, 2008, The total economic value of threatened, endangered and rare species: an updated meta-analysis, Ecological Economics, 68, 1535, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.10.016 Rosenberger, 2000, Using meta-analysis for benefit transfer: in sample convergent validity tests of an outdoor recreation database, Water Resources Research, 36, 1097, 10.1029/2000WR900006 Sattout, 2007, Economic value of cedar relics in Lebanon: an application of contingent valuation method for conservation, Ecological Economics, 61, 315, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.03.001 Scarpa, 2000, Valuing the recreational benefits from the creation of nature reserves in Irish forests, Ecological Economics, 33, 237, 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00143-3 Shechter, 1998, Measuring passive use value, Environmental and Resource Economics, 12, 457, 10.1023/A:1008397411466 Shrestha, 2001, Testing a meta-analysis model for benefit transfer in international outdoor recreation, Ecological Economics, 39, 67, 10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00193-8 Shrestha, 2003, Meta-analytic benefit transfer of outdoor recreation economic values: testing out-of-sample convergent validity, Environmental and Resource Economics, 25, 79, 10.1023/A:1023658501572 Smith, 1990, Signals or noise? Explaining the variation in recreation benefit estimates, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 72, 419, 10.2307/1242344 Smith, 1996, Do contingent valuation estimates pass a “scope” test? A meta-analysis, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 31, 287, 10.1006/jeem.1996.0045 Svedsäter, 2000, Contingent valuation of global environmental resources: test of perfect and regular embedding, Journal of Economic Psychology, 21, 605, 10.1016/S0167-4870(00)00022-2 Treiman, 2006, Are residents willing to pay for their community forests? Results of a contingent valuation survey in Missouri, USA, Urban Studies, 43, 1537, 10.1080/00420980600749928 Tÿrväinen, 2001, Economic valuation of urban forest benefits in Finland, Journal of Environmental Management, 62, 75, 10.1006/jema.2001.0421 Tÿrvänein, 1998, The economic value of urban forest amenities: an application of the contingent valuation method, Landscape and Urban Planning, 43, 105, 10.1016/S0169-2046(98)00103-0 2004, Wildland fires, a double impact on the planet Veisten, 2006, Contingent valuation and actual payment for voluntarily provided passive-use values: assessing the effect o fan induced truth-telling mechanism and elicitation formats, Applied Economics, 38, 735, 10.1080/00036840500400152 Walsh, 1990, Estimating the public benefits of protecting forest quality, Journal of Environmental Management, 30, 175, 10.1016/0301-4797(90)90014-N Walsh, 1992, Benefit transfer of outdoor recreation demand studies, 1968–1988, Water Resources Research, 28, 707, 10.1029/91WR02597 Woodward, 2001, The economic value of wetland services: a meta-analysis, Ecological Economics, 37, 257, 10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00276-7 Zandersen, 2009, A meta-analysis of forest recreation values in Europe, Journal of Forest Economics, 15, 109, 10.1016/j.jfe.2008.03.006