Experiences and perceptions of coercive practices in mental health care among service users in Nigeria: a qualitative study

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 16 - Trang 1-11 - 2022
Deborah Oyine Aluh1,2,3, Olaniyi Ayilara4, Justus Uchenna Onu5, Ugnė Grigaitė1,2, Barbara Pedrosa1,2, Margarida Santos-Dias1,2, Graça Cardoso1,2, José Miguel Caldas-de-Almeida1,2
1Comprehensive Health Research Centre (CHRC), Nova Medical School, Nova University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
2Lisbon Institute of Global Mental Health, Lisbon, Portugal
3Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Management, University of Nigeria Nsukka, Nsukka, Enugu State, Nigeria
4Department of Clinical Services, Federal Neuropsychiatric Hospital, Uselu, Nigeria
5Department of Mental Health, Faculty of Medicine, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria

Tóm tắt

People with mental health problems are more vulnerable to a broad range of coercive practices and human rights abuses. There is a global campaign to eliminate, or at the very least decrease, the use of coercion in mental health care. The use of coercion in psychiatric hospitals in developing countries is poorly documented. The primary aim of this study was to explore service users’ perceptions and experiences of coercion in psychiatric hospitals in Nigeria. Four focus group discussions were carried out among 30 service users on admission in two major psychiatric hospitals in Nigeria. The audio recordings were transcribed verbatim and then analyzed thematically with the aid of MAXQDA software. The Focus group participants included 19 males and 11 females with a mean age of 34.67 ± 9.54. Schizophrenia was the most common diagnosis (40%, n = 12) and had a secondary school education (60%, n = 18). The focus group participants perceived coercion to be a necessary evil in severe cases but anti-therapeutic to their own recovery, an extension of stigma and a vicious cycle of abuse. The experience of involuntary admission revolved mainly around deception, maltreatment, and disdain. Participants in both study sites narrated experiences of being flogged for refusing medication. Mechanical restraint with chains was a common experience for reasons including refusing medications, to prevent absconding and in other cases, punitively. The use of chains was viewed by participants as dehumanizing and excruciatingly painful. The experiences of coercion by participants in this study confirm that human rights violations occur in large psychiatric hospitals and underscore the need for mental health services reform. The use of coercion in this context reflects agelong underinvestment in the mental health care system in the country and obsolete mental health legislation that does not protect the rights of people with mental health problems. The study findings highlight an urgent need to address issues of human rights violations in psychiatric hospitals in the country.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Nelstrop L, Chandler-Oatts J, Bingley W, et al. A systematic review of the safety and effectiveness of restraint and seclusion as interventions for the short-term management of violence in adult psychiatric inpatient settings and emergency departments. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2006;3:8–18. Wilson C, Rouse L, Rae S, Kar Ray M. Mental health inpatients’ and staff members’ suggestions for reducing physical restraint: A qualitative study. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2018;25:188–200. Sailas EE, Fenton M, Group CS. Seclusion and restraint for people with serious mental illnesses. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001163. Szmukler G. Compulsion and “coercion” in mental health care. World Psychiatr. 2015;14:259. Szmukler PG, Appelbaum PS. Treatment pressures, leverage, coercion, and compulsion in mental health care. J Mental Health. 2009;17:233–44. Gooding P, McSherry B, Roper C. Preventing and reducing ‘coercion’ in mental health services: an international scoping review of English-language studies. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2020;142:27–39. Norvoll R, Pedersen R. Exploring the views of people with mental health problems’ on the concept of coercion: towards a broader socio-ethical perspective. Soc Sci Med. 2016;156:204–11. Kallert T. Coercion in psychiatry. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2008;21:485–9. Hem M, Gjerberg E, Husum T, Pedersen R. Ethical challenges when using coercion in mental healthcare: a systematic literature review. Nurs Ethics. 2018;25:92–110. United Nations (2006) Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and Optional Protocol. Disabilities UNC on the R of P with (2014) Guidelines on article 14 of the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities, The right to liberty and security of persons with disabilities. (CRPD/C/12/2, Annex IV, 5 November 2014). Esan O, Abdumalik J, Eaton J, Kola L, Fadahunsi W, Gureje O. Mental health care in Anglophone West Africa. Psychiatr Serv. 2014;65:1084–7. Odejide AO, Morakinyo JJ, Oshiname FO, Omigbodun O, Ajuwon AJ, Kola L. Integrating mental health into primary health care in Nigeria: management of depression in a local government (district) area as a paradigm. Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi. 2002;104:802–9. Gureje O, Abdulmalik J, Kola L, Musa E, Yasamy MT. Adebayo K (2015) Integrating mental health into primary care in Nigeria: report of a demonstration project using the mental health gap action programme intervention guide. BMC Heal Serv Res. 2015;151(15):1–8. Eaton J, Gureje O, De Silva M, et al. A structured approach to integrating mental health services into primary care: development of the Mental Health Scale Up Nigeria intervention (mhSUN. Int J Ment Heal Syst. 2018;121(12):1–12. WHO (2006) WHO-Aims report on mental health system in Nigeria Ministry of health Nigeria. African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights | African Union. https://au.int/en/treaties/african-charter-human-and-peoples-rights. Accessed 4 Sep 2021 Nigeria Passes Disability Rights Law | Human Rights Watch. https://www.hrw.org/news/2019/01/25/nigeria-passes-disability-rights-law. Accessed 4 Sep 2021 Abdulmalik J, Kola L, Gureje O. Mental health system governance in Nigeria: challenges, opportunities and strategies for improvement. Glob Ment Heal. 2016;3:1–11. The Silent Pandemic: Legislative Reforms to Protect Nigerian Minds During COVID-19—Africa Policy Journal. https://apj.hkspublications.org/the-silent-pandemic-legislative-reforms-to-protect-nigerian-minds-during-covid-19/. Accessed 1 Mar 2022 McSherry Bernadette, Weller Penny. Rethinking rights-based mental Health Laws. Rethink Rights-Based Ment Heal Laws. 2010;https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474200714. Suryani L, Lesmana C, Tiliopoulos N. Treating the untreated: applying a community-based, culturally sensitive psychiatric intervention to confined and physically restrained mentally ill individuals in Bali, Indonesia. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00406-011-0238-Y. Asher L, Fekadu A, Teferra S, De SM, Pathare S, Hanlon C. “I cry every day and night, I have my son tied in chains”: physical restraint of people with schizophrenia in community settings in Ethiopia. Global Health. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12992-017-0273-1. Minas H. Diatri H (2008) pasung: physical restraint and confinement of the mentally ill in the community. Int J Ment Heal Syst. 2008;21(2):1–5. Puteh I, Marthoenis M. Minas H (2011) aceh free pasung: releasing the mentally ill from physical restraint. Int J Ment Heal Syst. 2011;51(5):1–5. Beames L, Onwumere J. Risk factors associated with use of coercive practices in adult mental health inpatients: a systematic review. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/JPM.12757. Walker S, Mackay E, Barnett P, Sheridan Rains L, Leverton M, Dalton-Locke C, Trevillion K, Lloyd-Evans B, Johnson S. Clinical and social factors associated with increased risk for involuntary psychiatric hospitalisation: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and narrative synthesis. The Lancet Psychiatr. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30406-7. García-Cabeza I, Calcedo A, Mendoza OM, Mundt A, Valentil E. Cultural differences in the use of covert coercion among mental health professionals of latin culture: a focus group study. Ethical Hum Psychol Psychiatr. 2021;23:39–50. Akther S, Molyneaux E, Stuart R, Johnson S, Simpson A, Oram S. Patients’ experiences of assessment and detention under mental health legislation: systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis. BJPsych Open. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1192/BJO.2019.19. Krueger RA (2015) Focus Groups: a practical guide to applied research. Brophy LM, Roper CE, Hamilton BE, Tellez JJ, McSherry BM. Consumers and carer perspectives on poor practice and the use of seclusion and restraint in mental health settings: results from Australian focus groups. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2016;10:6. Nyttingnes O, Ruud T, Rugkåsa J. ‘It’s unbelievably humiliating’—patients’ expressions of negative effects of coercion in mental health care. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2016;49:147–53. Karnieli-Miller O, Strier R, Pessach L. Power Relations in Qualitative Research. 2009; https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732308329306. Schulze B, Angermeyer MC. Subjective experiences of stigma. A focus group study of schizophrenic patients, their relatives and mental health professionals. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56:299–312. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101. Braun V, Clarke V (2019) Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. 11:589–597. National NDN (NDN) and, Disabilities C on the R of P with, (NCRPD) (2017) CRPD Alternate Report for India Submitted to the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities In response to the Initial report submitted by the Government of India National CRPD Coalition-India, towards Parallel report. Thomas DR. a general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. Am J Eval. 2016;27:237–46. Sibitz I, Scheutz A, Lakeman R, Schrank B, Schaffer M, Amering M. Impact of coercive measures on life stories: qualitative study. Br J Psychiatr. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.110.087841. Wilson C, Rouse L, Rae S, Kar Ray M. Is restraint a ‘necessary evil’ in mental health care? Mental health inpatients’ and staff members’ experience of physical restraint. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2017;26:500–12. Spinzy Y, Maree S, Segev A. Cohen-rappaport G (2018) listening to the patient perspective: psychiatric inpatients’ attitudes towards physical restraint. Psychiatr Q. 2018;893(89):691–6. Ogbonna BO. Social welfare scheme; a neglected component of public health care services in Nigeria. MOJ Public Health. 2016. https://doi.org/10.15406/mojph.2017.05.00132. Healing from depression, “demons” and deliverances: The cost of mental healthcare in Nigeria is prohibitively high - sahelien.com | EN. https://sahelien.com/en/healing-from-depression-demons-and-deliverances-the-cost-of-mental-healthcare-in-nigeria-is-prohibitively-high/. Accessed 3 Mar 2022. Theodoridou A, Schlatter F, Ajdacic V, Rössler W, Jäger M. Therapeutic relationship in the context of perceived coercion in a psychiatric population. Psychiatry Res. 2012;200:939–44. van den Hooff S, Goossensen A. How to increase quality of care during coercive admission? A review of literature. Scand J Caring Sci. 2014;28:425–34. Liu NH, Daumit GL, Dua T, et al. Excess mortality in persons with severe mental disorders: a multilevel intervention framework and priorities for clinical practice, policy and research agendas. World Psychiatr. 2017;16:30. Kelman HC (2017) Violence without Moral Restraint: Reflections on the Dehumanization of victims and victimizers. Criminol War. p.145–181. Locke KD. Aggression, narcissism, self-esteem, and the attribution of desirable and humanizing traits to self versus others. J Res Pers. 2009;43:99–102. Osofsky MJ, Bandura A, Zimbardo PG. The role of moral disengagement in the execution process. Law Hum Behav. 2005;294(29):371–93. Fontesse S, Rimez X, Maurage P. Stigmatization and dehumanization perceptions towards psychiatric patients among nurses: A path-analysis approach. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2021;35:153–61. Moro MF, Kola L, Fadahunsi O, et al. Quality of care and respect of human rights in mental health services in four West African countries: collaboration between the mental health leadership and advocacy programme and the World Health Organization QualityRights initiative. BJPsych Open. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1192/BJO.2021.1080. Nigeria: People With Mental Health Conditions Chained, Abused | Human Rights Watch. https://www.hrw.org/news/2019/11/11/nigeria-people-mental-health-conditions-chained-abused. Accessed 30 Jan 2022. Nigeria urged to ban chaining people with mental health issues | Mental Health News | Al Jazeera. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/11/11/nigeria-urged-to-ban-chaining-people-with-mental-health-issues. Accessed 3 Mar 2022. BBC News | SOUTH ASIA | Chaining ban after India asylum fire. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/1477816.stm. Accessed 3 Mar 2022. Sashidharan SP, Mezzina R, Puras D. Reducing coercion in mental healthcare. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2019;28:605. Sandman L, Munthe C. Shared decision making, paternalism and patient choice. Heal Care Anal. 2010;18:60–84. (2022) World Mental Health Report. In: World Ment. Heal. Rep. Transform. Ment. Heal. all. https://www.who.int/teams/mental-health-and-substance-use/world-mental-health-report. Accessed 6 Jul 2022 WHO QualityRights Tool Kit. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241548410. Accessed 29 Jun 2022. Barbui C, Purgato M, Abdulmalik J, et al. Efficacy of interventions to reduce coercive treatment in mental health services: umbrella review of randomised evidence. Br J Psychiatry. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2020.144. Creswell JW, Poth CN. Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publ Inc; 2017.