Identifying the research focus of Library and Information Science institutions in China with institution-specific keywords

Abrahamson, E. (1996). Management fashion. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 254–285. Abramo, G., Cicero, T., & D’Angelo, C. A. (2013). National peer-review research assessment exercises for the hard sciences can be a complete waste of money: The Italian case. Scientometrics, 95(1), 311–324. Abramo, G., & D’Angelo, C. A. (2014). Assessing national strengths and weaknesses in research fields. Journal of Informetrics, 8(3), 766–775. Aguillo, I. F., Bar-Ilan, J., Levene, M., & Ortega, J. L. (2010). Comparing university rankings. Scientometrics, 85(1), 243–256. An, L., Yu, C., & Li, G. (2014). Visual topical analysis of Chinese and American Library and Information Science research institutions. Journal of Informetrics, 8(1), 217–233. Assefa, S. G., & Rorissa, A. (2013). A bibliometric mapping of the structure of STEM education using co-word analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(12), 2513–2536. Balassa, B. (1965). Trade liberalisation and “revealed” comparative advantage 1. The Manchester School, 33(2), 99–123. Belter, C., & Sen, A. (2014). Bibliometric performance measures for the evaluation of NOAA R&D. Bornmann, L. (2011). Scientific peer review. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 45(1), 197–245. Bornmann, L., de Moya Anegón, F., & Leydesdorff, L. (2012). The new excellence indicator in the world report of the SCImago Institutions Rankings 2011. Journal of Informetrics, 6(2), 333–335. Bornmann, L., Stefaner, M., de Moya Anegón, F., & Mutz, R. (2014). Ranking and mapping of universities and research-focused institutions worldwide based on highly-cited papers: A visualisation of results from multi-level models. Online Information Review, 38(1), 43–58. Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., & Laville, F. (1991). Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemsitry. Scientometrics, 22(1), 155–205. Choi, J., Yi, S., & Lee, K. C. (2011). Analysis of keyword networks in MIS research and implications for predicting knowledge evolution. Information and Management, 48(8), 371–381. Ding, Y., Chowdhury, G. G., & Foo, S. (2001). Bibliometric cartography of information retrieval research by using co-word analysis. Information Processing and Management, 37(6), 817–842. Frame, J. D. (1977). Mainstream research in Latin America and the Caribbean. Interciencia, 2(3), 143–148. Glänzel, W., Thijs, B., Schubert, A., & Debackere, K. (2009). Subfield-specific normalized relative indicators and a new generation of relational charts: Methodological foundations illustrated on the assessment of institutional research performance. Scientometrics, 78(1), 165–188. Harzing, A. W., & Giroud, A. (2014). The competitive advantage of nations: An application to academia. Journal of Informetrics, 8(1), 29–42. Hazelkorn, E. (2014). Reflections on a decade of global rankings: What we’ve learned and outstanding issues. European Journal of Education, 49(1), 12–28. He, Q. (1999). Knowledge discovery through co-word analysis. Library Trends, 48(1), 133–159. Hicks, D. (2012). Performance-based university research funding systems. Research Policy, 41(2), 251–261. Holten, D., Cornelissen, B., & Van Wijk, J. J. (2007). Trace visualization using hierarchical edge bundles and massive sequence views. In Proceedings of the 4th IEEE international workshop on visualizing software for understanding and analysis, 2007. VISSOFT 2007 (pp. 47–54). IEEE. Hu, C. P., Hu, J. M., Deng, S. L., & Liu, Y. (2013). A co-word analysis of Library and Information Science in China. Scientometrics, 97(2), 369–382. Hu, C. P., Hu, J. M., Gao, Y., & Zhang, Y. K. (2011). A journal co-citation analysis of Library and Information Science in China. Scientometrics, 86(3), 657–670. Huang, M. H., Chang, H. W., & Chen, D. Z. (2006). Research evaluation of research-oriented universities in Taiwan from 1993 to 2003. Scientometrics, 67(3), 419–435. ISTIC. (2013). About ISTIC. Retrieved August 21, 2013. http://www.istic.ac.cn/English/ Law, J., & Whittaker, J. (1992). Mapping acidification research: A test of the co-word method. Scientometrics, 23(3), 417–461. Leta, J., Glänzel, W., & Thijs, B. (2006). Science in Brazil. Part 2: Sectoral and institutional research profiles. Scientometrics, 67(1), 87–105. Liu, X., & Ma, F. (2013). Transfer and distribution of knowledge creation activities of bio-scientists in knowledge space. Scientometrics, 95(1), 299–310. López-Illescas, C., de Moya-Anegón, F., & Moed, H. F. (2011). A ranking of universities should account for differences in their disciplinary specialization. Scientometrics, 88(2), 563–574. McCloskey, D. N. (1998). The rhetoric of economics. Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press. Miguel, S., Moya-Anegón, F., & Herrero-Solana, V. (2008). A new approach to institutional domain analysis: multilevel research fronts structure. Scientometrics, 74(3), 331–344. Milojević, S., Sugimoto, C. R., Yan, E., & Ding, Y. (2011). The cognitive structure of Library and Information Science: Analysis of article title words. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(10), 1933–1953. Moed, H. F., de Moya-Anegón, F., López-Illescas, C., & Visser, M. (2011). Is concentration of university research associated with better research performance? Journal of Informetrics, 5(4), 649–658. National Science Library. (2013). About the Libraries Home. Retrieved August 21, 2013. http://english.las.cas.cn/au/ Niu, B., Hong, S., Yuan, J., Peng, S., Wang, Z., & Zhang, X. (2014). Global trends in sediment-related research in earth science during 1992–2011: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 98(1), 511–529. Pouris, A., & Ho, Y. S. (2014). Research emphasis and collaboration in Africa. Scientometrics, 98(3), 2169–2184. Quoniam, L., Balme, F., Rostaing, H., Giraud, E., & Dou, J. M. (1998). Bibliometric law used for information retrieval. Scientometrics, 41(1), 83–91. Rip, A., & Courtial, J. P. (1984). Co-word maps of biotechnology: An example of cognitive scientometrics. Scientometrics, 6(6), 381–400. STolZ, I., Hendel, D. D., & Horn, A. S. (2010). Ranking of rankings: Benchmarking twenty-five higher education ranking systems in Europe. Higher Education, 60(5), 507–528. Su, X., Deng, S., & Shen, S. (2014). The design and application value of the Chinese Social Science Citation Index. Scientometrics, 98(3), 1567–1582. Thijs, B., & Glänzel, W. (2008). A structural analysis of publication profiles for the classification of European research institutes. Scientometrics, 74(2), 223–236. Thijs, B., & Glänzel, W. (2010). A structural analysis of collaboration between European research institutes. Research Evaluation, 19(1), 55–65. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2009). How to normalize cooccurrence data? An analysis of some well-known similarity measures. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(8), 1635–1651. Van Raan, A. F. J. (2005). Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods. Scientometrics, 62(1), 33–143. Waltman, L., Calero-Medina, C., Kosten, J., Noyons, E., Tijssen, R. J., Eck, N. J., et al. (2012). The Leiden Ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(12), 2419–2432. Yan, E., Ding, Y., & Zhu, Q. (2010). Mapping Library and Information Science in China: A coauthorship network analysis. Scientometrics, 83(1), 115–131. Yan, E., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2011). Institutional interactions: Exploring the social, cognitive, and geo-graphic relationships between institutions as demonstrated through citation networks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(8), 1498–1514. Yi, S., & Choi, J. (2012). The organization of scientific knowledge: the structural characteristics of keyword networks. Scientometrics, 90(3), 1015–1026. Zhao, R., & Wang, J. (2011). Visualizing the research on pervasive and ubiquitous computing. Scientometrics, 86(3), 593–612. Zhu, J., Hassan, S. U., Mirza, H. T., & Xie, Q. (2014). Measuring recent research performance for Chinese universities using bibliometric methods. Scientometrics, 101(1), 429–443. Zong, Q. J., Shen, H. Z., Yuan, Q. J., Hu, X. W., Hou, Z. P., & Deng, S. G. (2013). Doctoral dissertations of Library and Information Science in China: A co-word analysis. Scientometrics, 94(2), 781–799.