Provision of ecosystem services from the management of Natura 2000 sites in Umbria (Italy): Comparing the costs and benefits, using choice experiment

Allen, 2016, Moving beyond the exchange value in the non-market valuation of ecosystem services, Ecosyst. Serv., 18, 78, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.02.002 Alló, 2015, Farmers’ preferences and social capital regarding agri-environmental schemes to protect birds, J. Agric. Econ., 66, 672, 10.1111/1477-9552.12104 Aravena, 2014, Does money talk? The effect of a monetary attribute on the marginal values in a choice experiment, Energ. Econ., 44, 483, 10.1016/j.eneco.2014.02.017 Balmford, 2002, Economic reasons for conserving wild nature, Science, 297, 950, 10.1126/science.1073947 Bastian, 2013, The role of biodiversity in supporting ecosystem services in Natura 2000, Ecol. Indic., 24, 12, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.05.016 Ben- Akiva, 1985 Boxall, 2002, Understanding heterogeneous preferences in random utility models: a latent class approach, Environ. Resour. Econ., 23, 421, 10.1023/A:1021351721619 Bozdogan, 1987, Model selection and akaike’s information criterion (AIC): the general theory and its analytical extensions, Psychometrika, 52, 345, 10.1007/BF02294361 Broch, 2012, Using choice experiments to investigate the policy relevance of heterogeneity in farmer agri-environmental contract preferences, Environ. Resour. Econ., 51, 561, 10.1007/s10640-011-9512-8 Chaikaew, 2017, Estimating the value of ecosystem services in a mixed-use watershed: a choice experiment approach, Ecosyst. Serv., 23, 228, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.12.015 Chen, 1998, Environmental quality preference and benefit estimation in multinomial probit models: a simulation approach, Am. J. Agr. Econ., 80, 512, 10.2307/1244553 Christensen, 2011, Determinants of farmers’ willingness to participate in subsidy schemes for pesticide- free buffer zones- a choice experiment study, Ecol. Econ., 70, 1558, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.03.021 Christie, 2012, An economic assessment of the ecosystem service benefits derived from the SSSI biodiversity conservation policy in England and Wales, Ecosyst. Serv., 1, 70, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.004 de Groot, 2012, Global estimates of the value of the ecosystems and their services in monetary units, Ecosyst. Serv., 1, 50, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.005 De Lopez, 2003, Economics and stakeholders of ream national Park, Cambodia. Ecol. Econ., 46, 269, 10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00142-3 Doherty, 2014, Valuing ecosystem services across water bodies: results from a discrete choice experiment, Ecosyst. Serv., 7, 89, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.09.003 EEA- European Environment Agency, 2016 Espinosa- Goded, 2010, What do farmers want from agri-environmental scheme design? A choice experiment approach, J. Agric. Econ., 61, 259, 10.1111/j.1477-9552.2010.00244.x Etifor, 2015 EuroBarometer, 2013 Gantioler, 2010 Gantioler, 2014, The costs and socio- economic benefits associated with the Natura 2000 network, Int. J. Sust. Soc., 6, 135 Garrod, 2012, Heterogeneity of preferences for the benefits of environmental stewardship: a latent-class approach, Ecol. Econ., 76, 104, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.02.011 Gibson, 2004 Haines-Young, 2013 Hattam, 2015, Integrating methods for ecosystem service assessment and valuation: mixed methods or mixed messages?, Ecol. Econ., 120, 126, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.10.011 Horowitz, 2002, A review of WTA/WTP studies, J. Environ. Econ. Manag., 44, 426, 10.1006/jeem.2001.1215 Hoyos, 2012, Valuing a Natura 2000 network site to inform land use options using a discrete choice experiment: an illustration from the Basque Country, J. Forest Econ., 18, 329, 10.1016/j.jfe.2012.05.002 Hynes, 2008, Effect on welfare measures of alternative means of accounting for preference heterogeneity in recreational demand models, J. Agr. Econ., 90, 1011, 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01148.x James, 2001, Can we afford to conserve biodiversity?, Bioscience, 51, 43, 10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0043:CWATCB]2.0.CO;2 Kallis, 2013, To value or not to value? That is not the question, Ecol. Econ., 94, 97, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.07.002 Kosoy, 2010, Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism, Ecol. Econ., 69, 1228, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.002 Krinsky, 1986, On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities, Rev. Econ. Statistic., 68, 715, 10.2307/1924536 Kubiszewski, 2017, The future value of ecosystem services: global scenarios and national implications, Ecosys. Serv., 26, 289, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.05.004 Kuik, 2006 2010 Lancaster, 1966, A new approach to consumer theory, J. Polit. Econ., 74, 132, 10.1086/259131 Li, 2004, Using choice experiments to value the Natura 2000 nature conservation programs in Finland, Environ. Resour. Econ., 29, 361, 10.1007/s10640-004-9455-4 Lizin, 2015, Farmers’ perceived cost of land use restrictions: a simulated purchasing decision using discrete choice experiments, Land Use Policy., 46, 115, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.02.006 Liu, 2010, Valuing ecosystem services, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 1185, 54, 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05167.x Louviere, 1982, Design and analysis or simulated consumer choice or allocation experiments in travel choice modeling, Transport. Res. Rec., 890, 11 Louviere, 1983, Design and analysis or simulated consumer choice or allocation experiments: an approach based on aggregate data, J. Marketing Res., 20, 350, 10.1177/002224378302000403 Maes, 2012, Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem service supply, biodiversity and habitat conservation status in Europe, Biol. Conserv., 155, 1, 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.06.016 Marre, 2015, Non- market use and non-use value for preserving ecosystem services over time: a choice experiment application to coral reef ecosystems in New caledona, Ocean Coast. Manage., 105, 1, 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.12.010 McFadden, 1974, Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour, 105 MEA- Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005 Neuteleers, 2014, Talking money: how market-based valuation can undermine environmental protection, Ecol. Econ., 117, 253, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.06.022 Novikova, 2017, Assessing the benefit of the agroecosystem services: lithuan preferences using a latent class approach, Land Use Policy, 68, 277, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.07.051 Popescu, 2012, Species, habitats, society: an evaluation of research supporting EU’s Natura 2000 network, Plos One, 1 Posada, 2004, model selection and model averaging in phylogenetics: advantages of akaike information criterion and bayesian approaches Over likelihood ratio tests, Syst. Biol., 53, 793, 10.1080/10635150490522304 Pouta, 2000, Contingent valuation of the Natura 2000 nature conservation programme in Finland, Forestry, 73, 119, 10.1093/forestry/73.2.119 Rocchi, 2017, Defining agri-environmental schemes in the buffer areas of a natural regional park: an application of choice experiment using the latent class approach, Land Use Policy, 66, 141, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.04.033 Russo, 2011, Identification of landscapes for drafting Natura 2000 network management plans: a case study in sicily, Landscape Urban. Plan., 101, 228, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.028 Ruto, 2009, Investigating farmers’ preferences for the design of agri-environment schemes: a choice experiments approach, J. Environ. Plan. Manage., 52, 631, 10.1080/09640560902958172 Scarpa, 2005, Individual specific welfare measures for public goods: a latent class approach to residential customers of Yorkshire Water, 1 Thurstone, 1927, A law of comparative judgement, Psychol. Rev., 34, 273, 10.1037/h0070288 Train, 1998, Recreation demand models with taste differences over people, Land Econ., 74, 230, 10.2307/3147053 Train, 2003 Vedel, 2015, Forest owners’ willingness to accept contracts for ecosystem service provision is sensitive to additionality, Ecol. Econ., 113, 15, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.02.014 Villanueva, 2015, The design of agri-environmental schemes: farmers’ preferences in Southern Spain, Land Use Policy, 46, 142, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.02.009 Vivithkeyoonvong, 2017, Willingness to pay for ecosystem services provided by irrigated agriculture in northeast Thailand, Int. J. Biod. Ecosyst. Serv. Man., 13, 14, 10.1080/21513732.2016.1242093 Ziv, 2018, A bird’s eye view over ecosystem services in Natura 2000 sites across Europe, Ecosys. Serv., 30, 287, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.08.011