Stem size prediction in shoulder arthroplasty with preoperative 3D planning
Tóm tắt
Three-dimensional surgical planning software provides virtual reconstructions of the shoulder with automated joint indices for a preoperative case assessment. The aim of this single center study was to evaluate the concordance between the preoperatively selected humeral components and the final implants used in shoulder arthroplasty. 129 cases who had undergone anatomic (n = 16) or reverse shoulder arthroplasty (n = 117) using the same type of uncemented short stem implant and were included for review in this study. The type of arthroplasty, stem size, stem inclination, tray-offset and liner-thickness were noted preoperatively and compared to the final implant specifications used in surgery. The type of arthroplasty matched the surgical plan in 99.2% of cases, as one case was converted from RSA to TSA. The concordance of planned to implanted stem size was 44.2% and the planned size was in range of one adjacent size in 87.6% of cases. Stem inclination in TSA matched the surgical plan in 50% of cases. Tray offset in RSA was predicted correctly in 65% and liner-thickness matched the surgical plan in 98.3% of cases. Despite a low degree of concordance of planned to implanted stem sizes of 44.2%, the choice of stem size was found to be in range of one adjacent size in 87.6% of cases. Further investigations of other contributing factors are necessary to increase the accuracy of the preoperative selection of humeral implants. Level of evidence: level IV, retrospective case study.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Austin DC, Torchia MT, Cozzolino NH et al (2019) Decreased Reoperations and improved outcomes with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in comparison to hemiarthroplasty for geriatric proximal humerus fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Trauma 33:49–57. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001321
Petrillo S, Longo UG, Papalia R et al (2017) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears and cuff tear arthropathy: a systematic review. Musculoskelet Surg 101:105–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-017-0474-z
Walch G, Young AA, Boileau P et al (2012) Patterns of loosening of polyethylene keeled glenoid components after shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis: results of a multicenter study with more than five years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:145–150. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.J.00699
Bohsali KI, Bois AJ, Wirth MA (2017) Complications of Shoulder Arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 99:256–269. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.16.00935
Schnetzke M, Rick S, Raiss P et al (2018) Mid-term results of anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis using a short-stemmed cementless humeral component. Bone Joint J 100-B:603–609. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.100B5.BJJ-2017-1102.R2
Raiss P, Schnetzke M, Wittmann T et al (2019) Postoperative radiographic findings of an uncemented convertible short stem for anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 28:715–723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2018.08.037
Denard PJ, Raiss P, Gobezie R et al (2018) Stress shielding of the humerus in press-fit anatomic shoulder arthroplasty: review and recommendations for evaluation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 27:1139–1147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2017.12.020
Denard PJ, Noyes MP, Walker JB et al (2018) Proximal stress shielding is decreased with a short stem compared with a traditional-length stem in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 27:53–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2017.06.042
Abdic S, Athwal GS, Wittmann T et al (2021) Short stem humeral components in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: stem alignment influences the neck-shaft angle. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 141:183–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03424-4
Min KS, Fox HM, Bedi A et al (2020) Patient-specific planning in shoulder arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 102-B:365–370. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.102B3.BJJ-2019-1153.R1
Wylie JD, Tashjian RZ (2016) Planning software and patient-specific instruments in shoulder arthroplasty. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 9:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-016-9312-4
Iannotti JP, Weiner S, Rodriguez E et al (2015) Three-dimensional imaging and templating improve glenoid implant positioning. J Bone Joint Surg Am 97:651–658. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.N.00493
Boileau P, Cheval D, Gauci M-O et al (2018) Automated three-dimensional measurement of glenoid version and inclination in arthritic shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Am 100:57–65. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.16.01122
Wright-Medical Technology Inc. TORNIER BLUEPRINT: 3D Planning + PSI. https://www.wrightemedia.com/ProductFiles/Files/PDFs/AP-013380_EN_LR_LE.pdf. Accessed 19 Oct 2021
Bishi H, Smith JBV, Asopa V et al (2022) Comparison of the accuracy of 2D and 3D templating methods for planning primary total hip replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. EFORT Open Rev 7:70–83. https://doi.org/10.1530/EOR-21-0060
Buzzell JE, Lutton DM, Shyr Y et al (2009) Reliability and accuracy of templating the proximal humeral component for shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 18:728–733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2008.11.015
Lee CS, Davis SM, Lane CJ et al (2015) Reliability and accuracy of digital templating for the humeral component of total shoulder arthroplasty. Shoulder Elbow 7:29–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/1758573214550838
Raiss P, Walch G, Wittmann T et al (2020) Is preoperative planning effective for intraoperative glenoid implant size and type selection during anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty? J Shoulder Elbow Surg 29:2123–2127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2020.01.098
Bercik MJ, Kruse K, Yalizis M et al (2016) A modification to the Walch classification of the glenoid in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis using three-dimensional imaging. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 25:1601–1606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2016.03.010
Walch G, BadetBoulahia RA et al (1999) Morphologic study of the Glenoid in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty 14:756–760. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-5403(99)90232-2
Sirveaux F, Favard L, Oudet D et al (2004) Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive rupture of the cuff. Results of a multicentre study of 80 shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:388–395. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.86b3.14024
Schnetzke M, Coda S, Raiss P et al (2016) Radiologic bone adaptations on a cementless short-stem shoulder prosthesis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 25:650–657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2015.08.044
Farron A, Terrier A, Büchler P (2006) Risks of loosening of a prosthetic glenoid implanted in retroversion. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 15:521–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2005.10.003
Lévigne C, Boileau P, Favard L et al (2008) Scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 17:925–935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2008.02.010
Gutiérrez S, Comiskey CA, Luo Z-P et al (2008) Range of impingement-free abduction and adduction deficit after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Hierarchy of surgical and implant-design-related factors. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:2606–2615. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.00012
Lädermann A, Denard PJ, Boileau P et al (2015) Effect of humeral stem design on humeral position and range of motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Int Orthop 39:2205–2213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2984-3
Tross A-K, Lädermann A, Wittmann T et al (2020) Subsidence of uncemented short stems in reverse shoulder arthroplasty—a multicenter study. J Clin Med. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103362
Cho S-H, Jeong J (2020) Radiologic Results of three-dimensional templating for total shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Surg 12:232–237. https://doi.org/10.4055/cios19100
Barth J, Garret J, Geais L et al (2019) Influence of uncemented humeral stem proximal geometry on stress distributions and torsional stability following total shoulder arthroplasty. J Exp Orthop 6:8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-019-0178-4
Lucas RM, Hsu JE, Gee AO et al (2016) Impaction autografting: bone-preserving, secure fixation of a standard humeral component. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 25:1787–1794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2016.03.008