US Valuation of Health Outcomes Measured Using the PROMIS-29

Value in Health - Tập 17 - Trang 846-853 - 2014
Benjamin M. Craig1, Bryce B. Reeve2, Paul M. Brown3, David Cella4, Ron D. Hays5,6, Joseph Lipscomb7, A. Simon Pickard8, Dennis A. Revicki9
1Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center and University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
2Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
3School of Social Sciences, Humanities and Arts, University of California, Merced, Merced, CA, USA
4Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
5Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
6RAND, Health Program, Santa Monica, CA, USA
7Department of Health and Policy Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
8Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
9Outcomes Research, Evidera, Bethesda, MD, USA

Tài liệu tham khảo

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. What is comparative effectiveness research. Available from: http://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/index.cfm/what-is-comparative-effectiveness-research1/. [Accessed December 3, 2012]. Kozma, 1993, Economic, clinical, and humanistic outcomes: a planning model for pharmacoeconomic research, Clin Ther, 15, 1121 Fanshel, 1970, A health-status index and its application to health-services outcomes, Oper Res, 18, 1021, 10.1287/opre.18.6.1021 Lipscomb, 2009, Retaining, and enhancing, the QALY, Value Health, 12, S18, 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00518.x Neumann, 2009, Is the United States ready for QALYs?, Health Affairs (Project Hope), 28, 1366, 10.1377/hlthaff.28.5.1366 Cella, 2010, The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008, J Clin Epidemiol, 63, 1179, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.011 Revicki, 2009, Predicting EuroQol (EQ-5D) scores from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) global items and domain item banks in a United States sample, Qual Life Res, 18, 783, 10.1007/s11136-009-9489-8 Craig B, Reeve BB. Methods report on the PROMIS valuation study: year 1. 2012. Available from: http://labpages.moffitt.org/craigb/Publications/Report120928.pdf. [Accessed October 29, 2012]. Bansback, 2012, Using a discrete choice experiment to estimate health state utility values, J Health Econ, 31, 306, 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.11.004 Craig, 2013, US valuation of the SF-6D, Med Decis Making, 33, 793, 10.1177/0272989X13482524 Viney, 2014, An Australian discrete choice experiment to value EQ-5D health states, Health Econ, 23, 729, 10.1002/hec.2953 Craig, 2009, The episodic random utility model unifies time trade-off and discrete choice approaches in health state valuation, Popul Health Metr, 7, 3, 10.1186/1478-7954-7-3 Hadorn, 1992, Improving task comprehension in the measurement of health state preferences—a trial of informational cartoon figures and a paired-comparison task, J Clin Epidemiol, 45, 233, 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90083-Y Craig, 2011, Revisiting United States valuation of EQ-5D states, J Health Econ, 30, 1057, 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.07.009 Keeney, 1993 Adams, 2012, Universal health outcome measures for older persons with multiple chronic conditions, J Am Geriatr Soc, 60, 2333, 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04240.x Forrest, 2012, Commentary: The patient-reported outcome measurement information system (PROMIS) for children and youth: application to pediatric psychology, J Pediatr Psychol, 37, 614, 10.1093/jpepsy/jss038 Hinchcliff, 2011, Validity of two new patient-reported outcome measures in systemic sclerosis: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 29-Item Health Profile and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Dyspnea short form, Arthritis Care Res, 63, 1620, 10.1002/acr.20591 Selewski, 2013, Promising insights into the health related quality of life for children with severe obesity, Health Qual Life Outcomes, 11, 29, 10.1186/1477-7525-11-29 PROMIS-29 Profile v1.0. 2008-2012 PROMIS Health Organization and PROMIS Cooperative Group. Available from: https://www.assessmentcenter.net/ac1//files/pdf/44b7636201a34267a9213db7f69f2c6d.pdf. [Accessed June 6, 2012]. Craig, 2013, Comparison of US panel vendors for online surveys, J Med Int Res, 15, e260 Craig B, Owens MA. Methods report on the Child Health Valuation study (CHV): year 1. 2013. Available from: http://labpages.moffitt.org/craigb/Publications/CHVMethods_130917.pdf. [Accessed October 5, 2013]. 2008 Kahneman, 2003, A perspective on judgment and choice—mapping bounded rationality, Am Psychol, 58, 697, 10.1037/0003-066X.58.9.697 Bridges, 2011, Conjoint analysis applications in health—a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force, Value Health, 14, 403, 10.1016/j.jval.2010.11.013 PROMIS Assessment Center. PROMIS terms and conditions. 2012. Available from: https://www.assessmentcenter.net/documents/PROMIS%20Terms%20and%20Conditions%20v8%20July10_2012.pdf. [Accessed August 08, 2012]. National Institutes of Health. PROMIS: dynamic tools to measure health outcomes from the patient perspective. Available from: http://www.nihpromis.org/#1. [Accessed June 27, 2012]. Alexandrov, 2010, Characteristics of single-item measures in Likert scale format, Electr J Bus Res Meth, 8, 1 Swain, 2008, Assessing three sources of misresponse to reversed Likert items, J Mark Res, 45, 116, 10.1509/jmkr.45.1.116 Chrzan, 2010, Using partial profile choice experiments to handle large numbers of attributes, Int J Market Res, 52, 827, 10.2501/S1470785310201673 Louviere, 2009, Choice experiments in health: the good, the bad, the ugly and toward a brighter future, Health Econ Policy Law, 4, 527, 10.1017/S1744133109990193 Urban, 1908 Urban, 1968, Urban’s solution (minimum normit X2) Liu, 2010, Representativeness of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Internet panel, J Clin Epidemiol, 63, 1169, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.11.021 Luo, 2013, The effects of lead time and visual aids in TTO valuation: a study of the EQ-VT framework, Eur J Health Econ, 14, S15, 10.1007/s10198-013-0504-1 Furlong, 2001, The Health Utilities Index (HUI (R)) system for assessing health-related quality of life in clinical studies, Ann Med, 33, 375, 10.3109/07853890109002092 Brooks R, Rabin R, De Charro F. The Measurement and Valuation of Health Status Using EQ-5D: A European Perspective: Evidence from the EuroQol BIO MED Research Programme. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003. Andresen, 1998, Performance of a self-administered mailed version of the Quality of Well-Being (QWB-SA) questionnaire among older adults, Med Care, 36, 1349, 10.1097/00005650-199809000-00007 Fryback, 2010, Comparison of 5 health-related quality-of-life indexes using item response theory analysis, Med Decis Making, 30, 5, 10.1177/0272989X09347016 Feeny, 2012, Agreement about identifying patients who change over time: cautionary results in cataract and heart failure patients, Med Decis Making, 32, 273, 10.1177/0272989X11418671 Kaplan, 2011, Five preference-based indexes in cataract and heart failure patients were not equally responsive to change, J Clin Epidemiol, 64, 497, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.010 Bateman, 1997, Does part-whole bias exist? An experimental investigation, Econ J, 107, 322, 10.1111/j.0013-0133.1997.160.x Craig, 2009, Modeling ranking, time trade-off, and visual analog scale values for EQ-5D health states: a review and comparison of methods, Med Care, 47, 634, 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31819432ba Craig, 2013, Demographic differences in health preferences in the United States, Med Care, 52, 307, 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000066 Sullivan, 2006, Preference-based EQ-5D index scores for chronic conditions in the United States, Med Decis Making, 26, 410, 10.1177/0272989X06290495 Tengs, 2000, One thousand health-related quality-of-life estimates, Med Care, 38, 583, 10.1097/00005650-200006000-00004