Co-production: fostering greater inclusion or reproducing existing exclusion? An analysis of co-commissioning and resident participation on a South London housing estate

Adler P, Adler P (1987) Membership roles in field research. Sage, London. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984973 Alford J (2009) Engaging public sector clients: from service-delivery to co-production, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hampshire (272 pages, ISBN 978-0-230-22376-9) Alford J (2013) Engaging citizens in co-producing service outcomes. In: Lindquist EA, Vincent S, Wanna J (eds) Putting citizens first. ANU Press, Camberra, pp 75–82 Alford J, Yates S (2016) Co-production of public services in Australia: the roles of government organisations and co-producers. Aust J Public Adm 75(2):159–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12157 Amit V (2004) Constructing the field: ethnographic fieldwork in the contemporary world. Routledge, London Anderson L (2006) Analytic autoethnography. J Contemp Ethnography 35(4):373–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241605280449 Arnstein SR (2007) A ladder of citizen participation. J Am Inst Plann 35(4):216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225 Ashcraft K, Muhr S, Rennstam J, Sullivan K (2012) Professionalization as a branding activity: occupational identity and the dialectic of inclusivity-exclusivity. Gender Work Organization 19(5):467–488 Blackman S (2007) `Hidden ethnography’: crossing emotional borders in qualitative accounts of young people’s lives. Sociology 41(4):699–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038507078925 Booth J (2019) Empowering disadvantaged communities in the UK: missing the potential of co-production. Soc Change 49(2):276–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049085719832401 Boswell J, Corbett J (2017) Why and how to compare deliberative systems. Eur J Polit Res 56(4):801–819. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12205 Bottero W (2010) Intersubjectivity and Bourdieusian Approaches to ‘Identity.’ Cult Sociol 4(1):3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975509356750 Bourdieu P (1977) Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Bourdieu P (1984) Distinction: a social critique of the judgement of taste. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London Bourdieu P (1990) The logic of practice. Stanford University Press, Stanford Bourdieu P, Wacquant L (2013) Symbolic capital and social classes. J Class Sociol 13(2):292–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X12468736 Bovaird T, Loeffler E (2012) From engagement to co-production: the contribution of users and communities to outcomes and public value. Voluntas 23(4):1119–1138 Bovaird T, Stoker G, Jones T, Loeffler E, PinillaRoncancio M (2015a) Activating collective co-production of public services: influencing citizens to participate in complex governance mechanisms in the UK. Int Rev Adm Sci 82(1):47–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314566009 Bovaird T, Van Ryzin G, Loeffler E, Parrado S (2015b) Activating citizens to participate in collective co-production of public services. J Soc Policy 44(1):1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279414000567 Brubaker S, Keegan B (2018) “Suddenly everyone’s an expert in our field”: campus victim advocates and the promise and perils of professionalization. Violence Against Women 25(9):1116–1137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801218807096 Brunton-Smith I, Bullock K (2019) Patterns and drivers of co-production in neighbourhood watch in england and wales: from neo-liberalism to new localism. Br J Criminol 59(1):85–106 Bucerius S (2013) Becoming a “trusted outsider”: gender, ethnicity, and inequality in ethnographic research. J Contemp Ethnography 42(6):690–721. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241613497747 Charmaz K (2004) Premises, principles, and practices in qualitative research: revisiting the foundations. Qual Health Res 14(7):976–993. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732304266795 Corbin J, Strauss A (2008) Theoretical sampling. In: Corbin J, Strauss A (eds) Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 3rd edn. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp 143–158 Crompton A (2019) Inside co-production: Stakeholder meaning and situated practice. Soc Policy Adm 53(2):219–232 Decoteau C (2015) The reflexive habitus: critical realist and Bourdieusian social action. Eur J Soc Theory 19(3):303–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431015590700 Denshire S (2014) On auto-ethnography. Curr Sociol 62(6):831–850. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392114533339 Denzin N, Lincoln Y (2018) The sage handbook of qualitative research. Sage, London Dhattiwala R (2017) Mapping the self: challenges of insider research in a riot-affected city and strategies to improve data quality. Contemp South Asia 25(1):7–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09584935.2017.1297385 Docherty I, Goodlad R, Paddison R (2001) Civic culture, community and citizen participation in contrasting neighbourhoods. Urban Stud 38(12):2225–2250. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980120087144 Dwyer S, Buckle J (2009) The space between: on being an insider-outsider in qualitative research. Int J Qual Methods 8(1):54–63 Eglinton K (2013) Youth identities, localities, and visual material culture: making selves, making worlds. Springer, London Ellis CS, Bochner AP (2006) Analyzing analytic autoethnography: an autopsy. J Contemp Ethnography 35(4):429–449. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241606286979 Emmel N (2013) Sampling and choosing cases in qualitative research: a realist approach. SAGE Publications Ltd., London Evetts J (2003) The sociological analysis of professionalism. Int Sociol 18:395–415 Evetts J (2006) Trust and professionalism: challenges and occupational changes. Curr Sociol 54(4):515–531 Evetts J (2011) Sociological analysis of professionalism: past, present and future. Comp Sociol 10:1–37 Evetts J (2013) Professionalism: value and ideology. Curr Sociol 61(5/6):778–796 Farr M (2018) Power dynamics and collaborative mechanisms in co-production and co-design processes. Crit Soc Policy 38(4):623–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018317747444 Fledderus J, Brandsen T, Honingh ME (2015) User co-production of public service delivery: an uncertainty approach. Public Policy Adm 30:145–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076715572362 Flinders M, Wood M (2019) Ethnographic insights into competing forms of co-production: a case study of the politics of street trees in a northern English city. Soc Policy Adm 53(2):279–294 Fortun K (2012) Ethnography in late industrialism. Cult Anthropol 27(3):446–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1360.2012.01153.x Fung A (2015) Putting the public back into governance: the challenges of citizen participation and its future. Public Adm Rev 75(4):513–522. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12361 Galuszka J (2018) What makes urban governance co-productive? Contradictions in the current debate on co-production. Plann Theory 18(1):143–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095218780535 Geertz C (2007) Works and lives: the anthropologist as author. Polity Press, Oxford Gobo G (2018) Doing ethnography. Sage, London. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857028976 Grenfell M (2014) Pierre bourdieu key concepts. Taylor and Francis, Hoboken Hammersley M, Atkinson P (2010) Ethnography: principles in practice. Routledge, London Hickman P (2018) A flawed construct? Understanding and unpicking the concept of resilience in the context of economic hardship. Soc Policy Soc 17(3):409–424. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746417000227 Innes M, Davies B, McDermont M (2018) How co-production regulates. Soc Legal Stud 28(3):370–391. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663918777803 Jakobsen M, Andersen S (2013) Co-production and equity in public service delivery. Public Adm Rev 73(5):704–713. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12094 James E (2016) The professional humanitarian and the downsides of professionalisation. Disasters 40(2):185–206 Karner A, Brower Brown K, Marcantonio R, Alcorn L (2019) The view from the top of Arnstein’s ladder. J Am Plann Assoc 85(3):236–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2019.1617767 Kelly P (2014) Intercultural comparative research: rethinking insider and outsider perspectives. Oxford Rev Educ 40(2):246–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2014.900484 Kotzee B (2014) Expertise, fluency and social realism about professional knowledge. J Educ Work 27(2):161–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2012.738291 Leyshon C, Leyshon M, Jeffries J (2019) The complex spaces of co-production, volunteering, ageing and care. Area 51(3):433–442 Loeffler E, Bovaird T (2019) Co-commissioning of public services and outcomes in the UK: bringing co-production into the strategic commissioning cycle. Public Money Manag 39(4):241–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2019.1592905 Lyons M (2011) The professionalization of children’s services in Australia. J Sociol 48(2):115–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783311407945 Machamer P, Darden L, Craver C (2000) Thinking about mechanisms. Philos Sci 67(1):1–25. https://doi.org/10.1086/392759 Mathers J, Parry J, Jones S (2008) Exploring resident (non-)participation in the UK new deal for communities regeneration programme. Urban Stud 45(3):591–606. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098007087336 McKenzie L (2013) Narratives from a Nottingham council estate: a story of white working-class mothers with mixed-race children. Ethnic Racial Stud 36(8):1342–1358. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2013.776698 Mckenzie L (2015) Getting by: estates, class and culture in austerity Britain. Bristol Policy Press, Bristol Molland S (2013) Tandem ethnography: on researching ‘trafficking’ and ‘anti-trafficking.’ Ethnography 14(3):300–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138113491671 Moskovskaia A (2012) The professionalization of management. Russ Educ Soc 54(3):22–42 McQuaid R (2010) Theory of organizational partnerships: partnership advantages, disadvantages and success factors. In: Osborn SP (ed) The new public governance? Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance. Routledge, London, pp 127–148 Noordegraaf M (2011) Remaking professionals? How associations and professional education connect professionalism and organizations. Curr Sociol 59(4):465–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392111402716 Offer S (2012) The burden of reciprocity: processes of exclusion and withdrawal from personal networks among low-income families. Curr Sociol 60(6):788–805. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392112454754 Oliver C, O’Reilly K (2010) A bourdieusian analysis of class and migration: habitus and the individualizing process. Sociology 44(1):49–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038509351627 Osborne SP, Radnor Z, Strokosch K (2016) Co-production and the co-creation of value in public services: a suitable case for treatment? Null 18:639–653. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2015.1111927 Pemberton S, Fahmy E, Sutton E, Bell K (2015) Navigating the stigmatised identities of poverty in austere times: resisting and responding to narratives of personal failure. Crit Soc Policy 36(1):21–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018315601799 Pestoff V (2009) Towards a paradigm of democratic participation: citizen participation and co-production of personal social services in Sweden. Ann Public Coop Econ 80:197–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8292.2009.00384.x Pestoff V, Brandsen T (2010) Public governance and the third sector: opportunities for co-production and innovation. In: Osborne SP (ed) The new public governance: emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance. Routledge, London, pp 223–236 Reeves A (2015) Neither class nor status: arts participation and the social strata. Sociology 49:624–642 Steinmetz G (2011) Bourdieu, historicity, and historical sociology. Cult Sociol 5(1):45–66 Struthers J (2014) Analytic autoethnography: one story of the method. In: Theory and method in higher education research II., International Perspectives on Higher Education Research, vol. 10. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp 183–202 Swartz D (2013) Symbolic power, politics, and intellectuals: the political sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. University of Chicago Press, Chicago Tavory I, Timmermans S (2013) A pragmatist approach to causality in ethnography. Am J Sociol 119(3):682–714. https://doi.org/10.1086/675891 Thijssen P, Van Dooren W (2015) Who you are/where you live: do neighbourhood characteristics explain co-production? Int Rev Adm Sci 82(1):88–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852315570554 Tonkens E, Verhoeven I (2018) The civic support paradox: fighting unequal participation in deprived neighbourhoods. Urban Stud 56(8):1595–1610. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018761536 van Eijk C (2018) Helping Dutch neighborhood watch schemes to survive the rainy season: studying mutual perceptions on citizens’ and professionals’ engagement in the co-production of community safety. Voluntas 29(1):222–236 van Eijk C, Steen T (2015) Why engage in co-production of public services? Mixing theory and empirical evidence. Int Rev Adm Sci 82(1):28–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314566007 Vanleene D, Voets J, Verschuere B (2018) The co-production of a community: engaging citizens in derelict neighbourhoods. Voluntas 29(1):201–221 Vanleene D, Voets J, Verschuere B (2019) The co-production of public value in community development: can street-level professionals make a difference? Int Rev Adm Sci. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852318804040 Waring A, Waring J (2009) Looking the part: embodying the discourse of organizational professionalism in the City. Curr Sociol 57:344–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392108101587