Intra‐Cultivar Variation for Seed Weight and Other Agronomic Traits within Three Elite Soybean Cultivars

Wiley - Tập 47 Số 1 - Trang 367-373 - 2007
Vasilia A. Fasoula1, H. R. Boerma1
1Univ. of Georgia Center for Applied Genetic Technologies 111 Riverbend Rd. Athens GA 30602-6810

Tóm tắt

ABSTRACTDespite its importance, exploitation of intra‐cultivar variation has been very limited due to the belief that elite cultivars are highly homogeneous. The main objective of this study was to investigate the presence of exploitable intra‐cultivar variation for seed weight, maturity, and other agronomic traits within elite soybean cultivars released for their superior productivity and resistance to various diseases. Single‐plant progeny lines, selected at very low plant density from within these cultivars, were evaluated for seed weight, maturity, plant height, lodging, and seed yield in row‐plot replicated randomized complete block designs across years. For seed weight, the magnitude of intra‐cultivar variation across years between the largest‐ and the smallest‐seeded lines averaged 36 mg seed−1 for Benning, 22 mg seed−1 for Cook, and 45 mg seed−1 for Haskell. For maturity, the magnitude of intra‐cultivar variation was 5 d in Benning, 4 d in Cook, and 7 d in Haskell. Furthermore, we discovered intra‐cultivar variation for plant height within Cook and Haskell, and for lodging within Haskell. This study is the first one to report evidence of significant intra‐cultivar variation for seed weight, maturity, plant height, and lodging within soybean cultivars. The results suggest that cultivars may not be permanent records with nonexistent variation but genetic material that can be upgraded to maintain uniformity in the long term and further improve desirable agronomic or seed‐trait characteristics.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.2135/cropsci1992.0011183X003200020048x

10.2135/cropsci1994.0011183X003400020053x

10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183X003700060061x

Burton J.W., 1987, Soybeans: Improvement, production and uses

10.1016/S0378-4290(97)00030-0

10.2135/cropsci1968.0011183X000800010014x

10.1016/S0065-2660(08)60524-6

10.1093/aob/mci013

Dudley J.W., 2004, 100 generations of selection for oil and protein in corn, Plant Breed. Rev., 24, 79

10.1007/BF00023161

10.1016/j.fcr.2004.07.018

Fasoula D.A., 1997, Competitive ability and plant breeding, Plant Breed. Rev., 14, 89

Fasoula V.A., 2000, Honeycomb breeding: Principles and applications, Plant Breed. Rev., 18, 177

10.1016/S0378-4290(02)00026-6

Fasoula V.A., 2005, The impact of plant population density on crop yield and response to selection in maize, Maydica, 50, 39

Fasoulas A.C., 2000, New frontiers in cotton research. Proc. 2nd World Cotton Research Conference, 120

Fasoulas A.C., 1995, Honeycomb selection designs, Plant Breed. Rev., 13, 87, 10.1002/9780470650059.ch3

Gordon I.L., 1972, Comparisons among strains of the tobacco cultivar Hicks illustrating variability within a single cultivar, Queensland J. Agricultural and Animal Sci., 29, 255

10.2135/cropsci1968.0011183X000800030025x

Kuhn M.E., 1996, Soy in the spot light: Boom times for the bean, Food Process., 57, 52

10.1126/science.15739260

10.1603/0046-225X-30.1.76

10.1038/ng1615

10.1139/g97-050

Peterson P.A., 1997, Genetics, Biotechnology and Breeding of Maize and Sorghum. Proc. XVIIth Conference on Genetics, Biotechnology and Breeding of Maize and Sorghum, 10

10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183X003700020001x

10.2135/cropsci1963.0011183X000300020026x

Sprague G.F., 1960, Mutations affecting quantitative traits in selfed progeny of doubled monoploid maize stocks, Genetics, 45, 855, 10.1093/genetics/45.7.855

10.2307/2684289

Tokatlidis I.S., 2000, Variation within maize lines and hybrids in the absence of competition and relation between hybrid potential yield per plant with line traits, J. Agric. Sci., 134, 391, 10.1017/S0021859699007637

10.2135/cropsci2005.0125

10.1016/S0378-4290(03)00169-2

10.1016/B978-0-935315-63-9.50026-7

10.1139/g95-138