Research updating the APM Body of Knowledge 4th edition

International Journal of Project Management - Tập 24 Số 6 - Trang 461-473 - 2006
Peter W. G. Morris1, Ashley Jamieson1, Miles Shepherd2
1School of Construction and Project Management, University College London, Gower Street, London, United Kingdom
2International Project Management Association, 121 Harnham Road, Salisbury, Wiltshire SP2 8JT, United Kingdom

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Association for Project Management, 2000

Association for Project Management, 2004

APM Publishing Ltd., 2004

Argyris, 1978

Bennington, 2004, Project benefits management in IT projects – an Australian perspective, Proj Manag J, 35, 20, 10.1177/875697280403500204

Brown, 1991, Organizational learning and communities of practice: toward a unified view of working, Organization Sci, 2, 40, 10.1287/orsc.2.1.40

BS 6079-1. Guide to Project Management. BSI, London; 2002.

BS ISO 10006. Quality management systems – guidelines for quality management in projects. BSI, London; 2003.

Caupin G, Knöpfel H, Morris PWG, Motzel E, Pannenbäcker O. ICB IPMA Competence Baseline, International Project Management Association, Zurich. Available from: http://www.ipma.ch.1998.

Cook, 1999, Bridging Epistemologies: the generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing, Organization Sci, 10, 381, 10.1287/orsc.10.4.381

Cooke-Davies, 2004, Project success

Crawford, 2002, Profiling the competent project manager

Crawford, 2004, Global body of project management knowledge and standards

Crawford, 2004, Project categorization systems and their use in organisations: an empirical study

Crawford, 2005, Senior management perceptions of project management competence, Int J Proj Manag, 223, 7, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.06.005

Davies, 2005

ENAA P2M: A guidebook of project & program management for enterprise innovation: Summary translation. Revision 1, Project Management Professionals Certification Center (PMCC), Japan; 2002.

Engwall, 2003, No Project is an Island: Linking Projects to History and Context, Res Policy, 32, 789, 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00088-4

Flyvberg, 2003

Forsberg, 1996

Gale, 2004, Competencies: organizational and personal

Griseri, 2002

Hodgson, 2006, Are projects real? The PMBoK and the legitimation of project management knowledge

Institution of Civil Engineers, 1998

Johnson, 2003, Systems Integration and the social solution of technical problems in complex systems

Koskela L, Howell G. The underlying theory of project management is obsolete. In: Proceedings of PMI research conference 2002, Project Management Institute, Newton Square (PA); 2002. p. 293–302.

Lave, 1991

Melgrati A, Damiani M. Rethinking the project management framework: new epistemology. In: New insights proceedings of PMI research conference 2002.

Miller, 2000

Milis, 2004, The use of the balanced scorecard for the evaluation of information and communication technology projects, Int J Proj Manag, 22, 87, 10.1016/S0263-7863(03)00060-7

Mintzberg, 1996

Morris, 1987

Morris, 1994

Morris, 2001, Updating the project management bodies of knowledge, Proj Manag J, 32, 21, 10.1177/875697280103200304

Morris, 2003, Science, objective knowledge, and the theory of project management, Proc Inst Civil Eng, 150, 82

Morris PWG. The (ir)relevance of project management. In: Proceedings of international association for project management world congress, June, Moscow. IPMA, Zurich; 2003.

Morris, 2004, The validity of knowledge in project management and the challenge of learning and competency development

Morris PWG. Managing the front-end: how project managers shape business strategy and manage project definition. In: Proceedings of the 2005 project management institute EMEA symposium, Edinburgh. Project Management Institute, Newton Square (PA); 2005.

2004

Morris, 2004

Morris PWG, Crawford L, Hodgson D, Shepherd M, Thomas J. Project Management, Professionalism, and the Bodies of Knowledge. Int J Proj Manag [in press].

Munns, 1996, The role of project management in achieving project success, Int J Proj Manag, 14, 81, 10.1016/0263-7863(95)00057-7

Nonaka, 1995

Office of Government Commerce Managing Successful Programmes. The Stationery Office, Norwich; 2003.

Office of Government Commerce Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE 2. The Stationery Office, Norwich, UK; 2002.

Office of Government Commerce Management of Risk: Guidance for Practitioner. The Stationery Office, Norwich, UK; 2002.

Pannenbacker, 1998

Popper, 1972

Popper KR. Objective knowledge, Oxford; 1972.

Polanyi, 1958

Project Management Institute, 2004

Raz, 2003, Critical look at critical chain project management, Proj Manag J, 34, 24, 10.1177/875697280303400404

Schon, 1983

Söderlund, 2004, Building theories of project management: past research, questions for the future, Int J Proj Manag, 22, 183, 10.1016/S0263-7863(03)00070-X

Söderlund, 2004, On the broadening scope of the research on projects: a review and a model for analysis, Int J Proj Manag, 22, 655, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.05.011

Shenhar, 2004, How projects differ, and what to do about it

Steward, 2001, Balanced scorecard for projects, Proj Manag J, 21, 38, 10.1177/875697280103200106

2002

Thiry, 2004, Program management: a strategic decision management process

Thiry, 2004, Value management

Thomas, 2002, Selling project management to senior executives: the case for avoiding crisis sales, Proj Manag J, 33, 19, 10.1177/875697280203300204

Thomas, 2006, Problematizing project management

Wenger, 1997

Williams T. Assessing and building on the underlying theory of project management in the light of badly overrun projects. In: Proceedings of the PMI research conference, London. Project Management Institute, Newton Square (PA); 2004.

Winch, 2002

Woodhead, 2001

Winter, 2003, Soft systems: a fresh perspective for project management, Civil Eng, 156, 187