The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 16 - Trang 1-7 - 2020
Nathalie Percie du Sert1, Viki Hurst1, Amrita Ahluwalia2,3, Sabina Alam4, Marc T. Avey5, Monya Baker6, William J. Browne7, Alejandra Clark8, Innes C. Cuthill9, Ulrich Dirnagl10, Michael Emerson11, Paul Garner12, Stephen T. Holgate13, David W. Howells14, Natasha A. Karp15, Stanley E. Lazic16, Katie Lidster17, Catriona J. MacCallum18, Malcolm Macleod19, Esther J. Pearl1, Ole H. Petersen20, Frances Rawle21, Penny Reynolds22, Kieron Rooney23, Emily S. Sena19, Shai D. Silberberg24, Thomas Steckler25, Hanno Würbel26
1Experimental Design and Reporting, NC3Rs, London, UK
2The William Harvey Research Institute, London, UK
3Barts Cardiovascular CTU, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
4Publishing Ethics and Integrity, Taylor & Francis Group, London, UK
5Health Science Practice, ICF, Durham, USA
6Opinion, Nature, San Francisco, USA
7School of Education, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
8Life Sciences, PLOS ONE, Cambridge, UK
9School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
10QUEST Center for Transforming Biomedical Research, Berlin Institute of Health & Department of Experimental Neurology, Charite Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
11National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
12Centre for Evidence Synthesis in Global Health, Clinical Sciences Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
13Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
14Tasmanian School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia
15Data Sciences & Quantitative Biology, Discovery Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
16Prioris.ai Inc, Ottawa, Canada
17Animal Welfare, NC3Rs, London, UK
18Open Science, Hindawi Ltd, London, UK
19Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
20Academia Europaea Knowledge Hub, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
21Policy, Ethics and Governance, Medical Research Council, London, UK
22Statistics in Anesthesiology Research (STAR), Department of Anesthesiology College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
23Discipline of Exercise and Sport Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
24Research Quality, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, USA
25Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Beerse, Belgium
26Veterinary Public Health Institute, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

Tóm tắt

Reproducible science requires transparent reporting. The ARRIVE guidelines (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) were originally developed in 2010 to improve the reporting of animal research. They consist of a checklist of information to include in publications describing in vivo experiments to enable others to scrutinise the work adequately, evaluate its methodological rigour, and reproduce the methods and results. Despite considerable levels of endorsement by funders and journals over the years, adherence to the guidelines has been inconsistent, and the anticipated improvements in the quality of reporting in animal research publications have not been achieved. Here, we introduce ARRIVE 2.0. The guidelines have been updated and information reorganised to facilitate their use in practice. We used a Delphi exercise to prioritise and divide the items of the guidelines into 2 sets, the “ARRIVE Essential 10,” which constitutes the minimum requirement, and the “Recommended Set,” which describes the research context. This division facilitates improved reporting of animal research by supporting a stepwise approach to implementation. This helps journal editors and reviewers verify that the most important items are being reported in manuscripts. We have also developed the accompanying Explanation and Elaboration document, which serves (1) to explain the rationale behind each item in the guidelines, (2) to clarify key concepts, and (3) to provide illustrative examples. We aim, through these changes, to help ensure that researchers, reviewers, and journal editors are better equipped to improve the rigour and transparency of the scientific process and thus reproducibility.

Tài liệu tham khảo