Subsurface planning: Towards a common understanding of the subsurface as a multifunctional resource

Land Use Policy - Tập 90 - Trang 104316 - 2020
Yevheniya Volchko1, Jenny Norrman1, Lars O. Ericsson1, Kristina L. Nilsson2, Anders Markstedt3, Maria Öberg2, Fredrik Mossmark4, Nikolai Bobylev5, Per Tengborg6
1Chalmers University of Technology, Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, SE-412 96 Göteborg, Sweden
2Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, SE-971 87, Luleå, Sweden
3WSP, Arenavägen 7, SE-121 88 Stockholm, Sweden
4Geological Survey of Sweden (SGU), Guldhedsgatan 5C, SE-413 20, Göteborg, Sweden
5Saint Petersburg State University, Institute of Earth Sciences, 7-9, Universitetskaya nab., Saint Petersburg, 199034, Russia
6Rock Engineering Research Foundation (BeFo), Sturegatan 11, Box 55545, SE-114 85 Stockholm, Sweden

Tài liệu tham khảo

[CICES] Haines-Young, 2012 [CICES] Haines-Young, 2018 [EC] European Commission, 1997 [ITA] International Tunnelling and Underground Space Association, 1991, Policy statement on legal and administrative issues in underground space use, Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol., 6, 191, 10.1016/0886-7798(91)90066-D [ITA] International Tunnelling and Underground Space Association, 2019. Available at: https://tunnel.ita-aites.org/en/use-of-underground-spaces (Accessed 17 June 2019). [JP] The Japanese Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, City and Regional Development Bureau, 2019, New space for the creation of cities – deep underground [MEA] Millenium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005 [NL] Government of the Netherlands, 2019 [TEEB] The Economics of Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity, 2010 [UN] Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, 16 June 1972. Available at: http://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20150314024203/http%3A//www.unep.org/Documents.Multilingual/Default.asp?documentid%3D97%26articleid%3D1503 (Accessed 10 June 2019). Admiraal, 2016, Why underground space should be included in urban planning policy - and how this will enhance an urban underground future, Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol., 55, 214, 10.1016/j.tust.2015.11.013 Admiraal, 2016, Engaging decision makers for an urban underground future, Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol., 55, 221, 10.1016/j.tust.2015.08.009 Admiraal, 2006, A bottom-up approach to the planning of underground space, Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol., 21, 10.1016/j.tust.2005.12.102 Admiraal, 2009, Building on underground space awareness, 9 Barker, 1991, Legal and administrative issues in underground space use: a preliminary survey of ITA member nations, Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. Incorporating Trenchless, 6, 191, 10.1016/0886-7798(91)90066-D Bartel, 2016, Underground spatial planning - Perspectives and current research in Germany, Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol., 55, 112, 10.1016/j.tust.2015.11.023 Bauer, 2013, Impacts of the use of the geological subsurface for energy storage: an investigation concept, Environ. Earth Sci., 70, 3935, 10.1007/s12665-013-2883-0 Besner, 2016, Underground space needs an interdisciplinary approach, Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol., 55, 224, 10.1016/j.tust.2015.10.025 Blunier, 2007, Systemic approach of urban underground resources exploitation, 11th ACUUS International Conference - Underground Space: Expanding the Frontiers, 43 Bobylev, 2009, Mainstreaming sustainable development into a city’s Master plan: a case of Urban Underground Space use, Land Use Policy, 26, 1128, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.02.003 Bobylev, 2016, Geosystem and ecosystem services - exploring opportunities for inclusion in urban underground space planning, ACUUS 2018-16th World Conference of the Associated Research Centers for the Urban Underground Space: Integrated Underground Solutions for Compact Metropolitan Cities, Conference Proceedings, 238 Bobylev, 2016, Underground space as an urban indicator: measuring use of subsurface, Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol., 55, 40, 10.1016/j.tust.2015.10.024 Bobylev, 2016, Urban underground space: a growing imperative. Perspectives and current research in planning and design for underground space use, Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol., 55, 1, 10.1016/j.tust.2016.02.022 Broch, 2016, Planning and utilisation of rock caverns and tunnels in Norway, Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol., 55, 329, 10.1016/j.tust.2015.08.010 Broere, 2016, Urban underground space: solving the problems of today’s cities, Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol., 55, 245, 10.1016/j.tust.2015.11.012 Campbell, 2017, Geoscientists and urban decision-makers: european COST Sub-Urban Action (TU1206), Procedia Eng., 209, 4, 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.11.124 Clarke, 2000, Planning and mapping of underground space – an overview, Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol., 15, 271, 10.1016/S0886-7798(00)00056-0 Coogan, 1979, Classification and valuation of subsurface space, Undergr. Space, 3, 175 Dassonville, 2017, Definition and nature of space De Mulder, 2009, Earth science for the city, 22, 25 De Mulder, 2012 Delmastro, 2016, Underground urbanism: master plans and sectorial plans, Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol., 55, 103, 10.1016/j.tust.2016.01.001 Dick, 2019, Planning the city of tomorrow: bridging the gap between urban planners and subsurface specialists, Earth Environ. Sci. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb., 108, 327 Doyle, 2016, From hydro/geology to the streetscape: evaluating urban underground resource potential, Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol., 55, 83, 10.1016/j.tust.2016.01.021 Doyle, 2016, Underground potential for urban sustainability: mapping resources and their interactions with the Deep City method, Sustainability (Switzerland), 8 Drake, 2017, Anaerobic consortia of fungi and sulfate reducing bacteria in deep granite fractures, Nat. Commun., 8, 10.1038/s41467-017-00094-6 Duffaut, 2006, Underground city-planning: a French born concept for sustainable cities of tomorrow Evans, 2009, The present and future use of’ land’ below ground, Land Use Policy, 26, S302, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.09.015 Gray, 2012, Valuing geodiversity in an ‘ecosystem services’ context, Scottish Geogr. J., 128, 177, 10.1080/14702541.2012.725858 Gray, 2013, Geodiversity and the ecosystem approach: the contribution of geoscience in delivering integrated environmental management, Proc. Geol. Assoc., 124, 659, 10.1016/j.pgeola.2013.01.003 Griffioen, 2014, A technical investigation on tools and concepts for sustainable management of the subsurface in the Netherlands, Sci. Total Environ., 485–486, 810, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.02.114 Growing Underground, 2019 Hallbeck, 2014 Hénard, 1910 Hooimeijer, 2013, 52 Hooimeijer, 2018, The significance of the subsurface in urban renewal, J. Urban., 11, 303 Hooimeijer, 2017, Integrating subsurface management into spatial planning in the Netherlands, Sweden and Flanders, Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Urban Des. Plan., 170, 161 Hunt, 2011, Assessing the sustainability of underground space usage – a toolkit for testing possible Urban Futures, J. Sci., 8, 211 Hunt, 2016, Liveable cities and urban underground space, Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol., 55, 8, 10.1016/j.tust.2015.11.015 Ikävalko, 2016 Jansson, 1976, Terraspace – a world to explore, Undergr. Space, 1, 9 Jansson, 1978, City planning and the urban underground, Undergr. Space, 3, 99 Jansson, 1977 Kaliampakos, 2008, Underground space development: setting modern strategies, WIT Trans. Built Environ., 102, 1 Kaliampakos, 2016, A review on the economics of underground space utilization, Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol., 55, 236, 10.1016/j.tust.2015.10.022 Kishii, 2016, Utilization of underground space in Japan, Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol., 55, 320, 10.1016/j.tust.2015.12.007 Lamé, 2014 Laursen, 2016 Li, 2013, An integrated planning concept for the emerging underground urbanism: Deep City Method Part 2 case study for resource supply and project valuation, Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol., 38, 569, 10.1016/j.tust.2013.04.009 Li, 2016, An integrated strategy for sustainable development of the urban underground: from strategic, economic and societal aspects, Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol., 55, 67, 10.1016/j.tust.2015.12.011 Li, 2018, Deep Shanghai project – a strategy of infrastructure integration for megacities, Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol., 81, 547, 10.1016/j.tust.2018.08.008 Li, 2013, An integrated planning concept for the emerging underground urbanism: Deep City Method Part 1 concept, process and application, Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol., 38, 559, 10.1016/j.tust.2013.04.010 Li, 2016, Multiple resources and their sustainable development in Urban Underground Space, Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol., 55, 59, 10.1016/j.tust.2016.02.003 2018 Liu, 2005, Research of code system in the exploitation and management of underground space, Chin. J. Underground Space Eng., 2, 167 Makana, 2016, Assessment of the future resilience of sustainable urban sub-surface environments, Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol., 55, 21, 10.1016/j.tust.2015.11.016 Maring, 2018, Asset management to support urban land and subsurface management, Sci. Total Environ., 615, 390, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.109 Mielby, 2017 Mielby, 2017, Opening up the subsurface for the cities of tomorrow the subsurface in the planning process, Procedia Eng., 209, 12, 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.11.125 Morgan, 2013, Digging deep: property rights in subterranean space and the challenge of carbon capture and storage, Int. Comp. Law Q., 62, 813, 10.1017/S0020589313000353 Mossmark, 2018, The need for coherent three-dimensional planning of Swedish Urban areas Norrman, 2015, Balance 4P: balancing decisions for urban brownfield regeneration – case studies Norrman, 2016, Integration of the subsurface and the surface sectors for a more holistic approach for sustainable redevelopment of urban brownfields, Sci. Total Environ., 563–564, 879, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.097 Norrman, 2015 NRC, 2013 Parriaux, 2007, The DEEP CITY project: a global concept for a sustainable urban underground management, 11th ACUUS International Conference - Underground Space: Expanding the Frontiers, 255 Parriaux, 2004, The hidden side of cities – towards three-dimensional land planning, Energy Build., 36, 335, 10.1016/j.enbuild.2004.01.026 Pasqual, 2005, Underground land values, Land Use Policy, 22, 322, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.03.005 Pfleiderer, 2016 Price, 2016, Urban futures: the sustainable management of the ground beneath cities, Geol. Soc. Eng. Geol. Special Publ., 27, 19 Price, 2018, 3D ground-use optimization for sustainable urban development planning: a case-study from Earls Court, London, UK, Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol., 81, 144, 10.1016/j.tust.2018.06.025 Qiao, 2016, Lessons learnt from Urban Underground Space use in Shanghai-From Lujiazui Business District to Hongqiao Central Business District, Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol., 55, 308, 10.1016/j.tust.2015.12.001 Qihu, 2016, Present state, problems and development trends of urban underground space in China, Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol., 55, 280, 10.1016/j.tust.2015.11.007 Ritchie, 2019 Ruimtexmilieu, 2019 Rönkä, 1998, Underground space in land-use planning, Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol., 13, 39, 10.1016/S0886-7798(98)00029-7 Seither, 2016 Shah, 2014, 3769 Sprankling, 2008, Owning the center of the earth, UCLA Law Rev., 55, 979 Sterling, 1996, Going under to stay on top, revisited: results of a colloquium on underground space utilization, Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol., 11, 263, 10.1016/0886-7798(96)00021-1 Sterling, 2012, Sustainability issues for underground space in urban areas, Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Urban Des. Plan., 165, 241 Stones, 2016, Underground space development key planning factors, Procedia Eng., 165, 343, 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.709 Takasaki, 2000, Planning and mapping of subsurface space in Japan, Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol., 15, 287, 10.1016/S0886-7798(00)00057-2 Tengborg, 2016, Development of the use of underground space in Sweden, Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol., 55, 339, 10.1016/j.tust.2016.01.002 Thomas, 1979, Ownership of subterranean space, Undergr. Space, 3, 155 Thomas, 1981, Legal aspects of using subsurface space, 1043 Thulin, 2014, Use of subterranean aquatic fauna in scandinavia for environmental controls and criteria for groundwater assessment Tummers, 2016 Uršej, 2007, The role of surface characteristics in directing subsurface spatial planning processes: the case study of a high-speed railway in Slovenia, Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol., 22, 414, 10.1016/j.tust.2006.09.003 Vähäaho, 2018 Vähäaho, 2016, An introduction to the development for urban underground space in Helsinki, Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol., 55, 324, 10.1016/j.tust.2015.10.001 van der Meulen, 2016, Abiotic flows should be inherent part of ecosystem services classification, Ecosyst. Serv., 19, 1, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.03.007 van der Meulen, 2016 van Ree, 2015, Is there a role for subsurface lease in urban development to gain community support?, Vol. 5, 1223 van Ree, 2016, Geosystem services: a concept in support of sustainable development of the subsurface, Ecosyst. Serv., 20, 30, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.06.004 van Ree, 2017, Geosystem services: a hidden link in ecosystem management, Ecosyst. Serv., 26, 58, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.05.013 Victorin, 2000, An introduction to real estate law – land law in action von der Tann, 2018, The hidden role of the subsurface for cities, Proc. Inst. Civil Eng.: Civil Eng., 171, 31 von der Tann, 2019, Systems approaches to urban underground space planning and management – a review, Undergr. Space, 10.1016/j.undsp.2019.03.003 Webster, 1914, Subterranean street planning, Ann. Am. Acad. Pol. Soc. Sci., 51, 200, 10.1177/000271621405100127 Whitbread, 2016 Winqvist, 1988 Winqvist, 1981, How can society encourage relevant use of subsurface space?, 1, 231 Wood, 1983, Subsurface planning, technology, and financing, Undergr. Space, 7, 308 Zammit, 2016 Zargarian, 2013, The role of underground space in a sustainable UK Urban environment, 930 Zhang, 2017, Property rights of urban underground space in China: a public good perspective, Land Use Policy, 65, 224, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.03.035 Zhao, 2016, Advances in master planning of urban underground space (UUS) in China, Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol., 55, 290, 10.1016/j.tust.2015.11.011 Zhou, 2016, Assessment and planning of underground space use in Singapore, Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol., 55, 249, 10.1016/j.tust.2015.12.018