Comparative Analysis of Transperineal Template Saturation Prostate Biopsy Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsy with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Guidance

The Journal of Urology - Tập 193 Số 1 - Trang 87-94 - 2015
Jan Philipp Radtke1, Timur H. Kuru2,1, Silvan Boxler3,1, Céline D. Alt4, Ionel Valentin Popeneciu1, Clemens Huettenbrink1, Tilman Klein1, Sarah Steinemann1, Claudia Bergstraesser1, Matthias Roethke2, Wilfried Roth5, Heinz-Peter Schlemmer2, Markus Hohenfellner1, Boris Hadaschik1
1Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
2Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
3Department of Urology, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
4Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
5Department of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Ploussard, 2014, Prospective evaluation of an extended 21-core biopsy scheme as initial prostate cancer diagnostic strategy, Eur Urol, 65, 154, 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.049

Siddiqui, 2013, Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy significantly upgrades prostate cancer versus systematic 12-core transrectal ultrasound biopsy, Eur Urol, 64, 713, 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.059

Pokorny, 2014, Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy versus magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with subsequent MR-guided biopsy in men without previous prostate biopsies, Eur Urol, 66, 22, 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.03.002

Heidenreich, 2014, EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent-update 2013, Eur Urol, 65, 124, 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.09.046

Thompson, 2014, Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging guiding diagnostic biopsy detects significant prostate cancer and could reduce unnecessary biopsies and over detection: a prospective study, J Urol, 192, 67, 10.1016/j.juro.2014.01.014

Rud, 2014, Detection of the index tumor and tumor volume in prostate cancer using T2w and DW MRI alone, BJU Int, 10.1111/bju.12637

Mowatt, 2013, The diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance spectroscopy and enhanced magnetic resonance imaging techniques in aiding the localisation of prostate abnormalities for biopsy: a systematic review and economic evaluation, Health Technol Assess, 17, vii, 10.3310/hta17200

de Rooij, 2013, Cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and MR-guided targeted biopsy versus systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy in diagnosing prostate cancer: a modelling study from a health care perspective, Eur Urol, 66, 430, 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.12.012

Moore, 2013, Standards of reporting for MRI-targeted biopsy studies (START) of the prostate: recommendations from an International Working Group, Eur Urol, 64, 544, 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.03.030

Barentsz, 2012, ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012, Eur Radiol, 22, 746, 10.1007/s00330-011-2377-y

Rais-Bahrami, 2013, Utility of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging suspicion levels for detecting prostate cancer, J Urol, 190, 1721, 10.1016/j.juro.2013.05.052

Portalez, 2012, Validation of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology scoring system for prostate cancer diagnosis on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in a cohort of repeat biopsy patients, Eur Urol, 62, 986, 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.06.044

Simmons, 2014, The PICTURE study—prostate imaging (multi-parametric MRI and Prostate HistoScanning) compared to transperineal ultrasound guided biopsy for significant prostate cancer risk evaluation, Contemp Clin Trials, 37, 69, 10.1016/j.cct.2013.11.009

Dickinson, 2011, Magnetic resonance imaging for the detection, localisation, and characterisation of prostate cancer: recommendations from a European consensus meeting, Eur Urol, 59, 477, 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.12.009

Kuru, 2013, Definitions of terms, processes and a minimum dataset for transperineal prostate biopsies: a standardization approach of the Ginsburg Study Group for Enhanced Prostate Diagnostics, BJU Int, 112, 568, 10.1111/bju.12132

Kuru, 2013, Critical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging targeted, transrectal ultrasound guided transperineal fusion biopsy for detection of prostate cancer, J Urol, 190, 1380, 10.1016/j.juro.2013.04.043

Haffner, 2011, Role of magnetic resonance imaging before initial biopsy: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging-targeted and systematic biopsy for significant prostate cancer detection, BJU Int, 108, E171, 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10112.x

Delongchamps, 2013, Prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging and prostate cancer detection: comparison of random and targeted biopsies, J Urol, 189, 493, 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.195

Bjurlin, 2014, Optimization of prostate biopsy: the role of magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy in detection, localization and risk assessment, J Urol, 192, 648, 10.1016/j.juro.2014.03.117

Kasivisvanathan, 2013, Transperineal magnetic resonance image targeted prostate biopsy versus transperineal template prostate biopsy in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer, J Urol, 189, 860, 10.1016/j.juro.2012.10.009

Graham, 2014, Prostate cancer: summary of updated NICE guidance, BMJ, 348, f7524, 10.1136/bmj.f7524

Turkbey, 2014, Comparison of endorectal coil and nonendorectal coil T2W and diffusion-weighted MRI at 3 Tesla for localizing prostate cancer: correlation with whole-mount histopathology, J Magn Reson Imaging, 39, 1443, 10.1002/jmri.24317

Bains, 2014, Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging detects significant prostate cancer with high probability, J Urol, 192, 737, 10.1016/j.juro.2014.03.039

Le, 2014, Magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion biopsy for prediction of final prostate pathology, J Urol, 192, 1367, 10.1016/j.juro.2014.04.094

Roethke, 2014, Evaluation of the ESUR PI-RADS scoring system for multiparametric MRI of the prostate with targeted MR/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy at 3.0 Tesla, Eur Radiol, 24, 344, 10.1007/s00330-013-3017-5

Numao, 2013, Usefulness of pre-biopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and clinical variables to reduce initial prostate biopsy in men with suspected clinically localized prostate cancer, J Urol, 190, 502, 10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.3197

Kuru, 2012, Phantom study of a novel stereotactic prostate biopsy system integrating preinterventional magnetic resonance imaging and live ultrasonography fusion, J Endourol, 26, 807, 10.1089/end.2011.0609

Ukimura, 2012, 3-Dimensional elastic registration system of prostate biopsy location by real-time 3-dimensional transrectal ultrasound guidance with magnetic resonance/transrectal ultrasound image fusion, J Urol, 187, 1080

Ahmed, 2011, Characterizing clinically significant prostate cancer using template prostate mapping biopsy, J Urol, 186, 458, 10.1016/j.juro.2011.03.147

Sonn, 2013, Targeted biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer using an office based magnetic resonance ultrasound fusion device, J Urol, 189, 86, 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.095