Comparative Analysis of Transperineal Template Saturation Prostate Biopsy Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsy with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Guidance
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Ploussard, 2014, Prospective evaluation of an extended 21-core biopsy scheme as initial prostate cancer diagnostic strategy, Eur Urol, 65, 154, 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.049
Siddiqui, 2013, Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy significantly upgrades prostate cancer versus systematic 12-core transrectal ultrasound biopsy, Eur Urol, 64, 713, 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.059
Pokorny, 2014, Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy versus magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with subsequent MR-guided biopsy in men without previous prostate biopsies, Eur Urol, 66, 22, 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.03.002
Heidenreich, 2014, EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent-update 2013, Eur Urol, 65, 124, 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.09.046
Thompson, 2014, Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging guiding diagnostic biopsy detects significant prostate cancer and could reduce unnecessary biopsies and over detection: a prospective study, J Urol, 192, 67, 10.1016/j.juro.2014.01.014
Rud, 2014, Detection of the index tumor and tumor volume in prostate cancer using T2w and DW MRI alone, BJU Int, 10.1111/bju.12637
Mowatt, 2013, The diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance spectroscopy and enhanced magnetic resonance imaging techniques in aiding the localisation of prostate abnormalities for biopsy: a systematic review and economic evaluation, Health Technol Assess, 17, vii, 10.3310/hta17200
de Rooij, 2013, Cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and MR-guided targeted biopsy versus systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy in diagnosing prostate cancer: a modelling study from a health care perspective, Eur Urol, 66, 430, 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.12.012
Moore, 2013, Standards of reporting for MRI-targeted biopsy studies (START) of the prostate: recommendations from an International Working Group, Eur Urol, 64, 544, 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.03.030
Rais-Bahrami, 2013, Utility of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging suspicion levels for detecting prostate cancer, J Urol, 190, 1721, 10.1016/j.juro.2013.05.052
Portalez, 2012, Validation of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology scoring system for prostate cancer diagnosis on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in a cohort of repeat biopsy patients, Eur Urol, 62, 986, 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.06.044
Simmons, 2014, The PICTURE study—prostate imaging (multi-parametric MRI and Prostate HistoScanning) compared to transperineal ultrasound guided biopsy for significant prostate cancer risk evaluation, Contemp Clin Trials, 37, 69, 10.1016/j.cct.2013.11.009
Dickinson, 2011, Magnetic resonance imaging for the detection, localisation, and characterisation of prostate cancer: recommendations from a European consensus meeting, Eur Urol, 59, 477, 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.12.009
Kuru, 2013, Definitions of terms, processes and a minimum dataset for transperineal prostate biopsies: a standardization approach of the Ginsburg Study Group for Enhanced Prostate Diagnostics, BJU Int, 112, 568, 10.1111/bju.12132
Kuru, 2013, Critical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging targeted, transrectal ultrasound guided transperineal fusion biopsy for detection of prostate cancer, J Urol, 190, 1380, 10.1016/j.juro.2013.04.043
Haffner, 2011, Role of magnetic resonance imaging before initial biopsy: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging-targeted and systematic biopsy for significant prostate cancer detection, BJU Int, 108, E171, 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10112.x
Delongchamps, 2013, Prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging and prostate cancer detection: comparison of random and targeted biopsies, J Urol, 189, 493, 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.195
Bjurlin, 2014, Optimization of prostate biopsy: the role of magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy in detection, localization and risk assessment, J Urol, 192, 648, 10.1016/j.juro.2014.03.117
Kasivisvanathan, 2013, Transperineal magnetic resonance image targeted prostate biopsy versus transperineal template prostate biopsy in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer, J Urol, 189, 860, 10.1016/j.juro.2012.10.009
Turkbey, 2014, Comparison of endorectal coil and nonendorectal coil T2W and diffusion-weighted MRI at 3 Tesla for localizing prostate cancer: correlation with whole-mount histopathology, J Magn Reson Imaging, 39, 1443, 10.1002/jmri.24317
Bains, 2014, Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging detects significant prostate cancer with high probability, J Urol, 192, 737, 10.1016/j.juro.2014.03.039
Le, 2014, Magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion biopsy for prediction of final prostate pathology, J Urol, 192, 1367, 10.1016/j.juro.2014.04.094
Roethke, 2014, Evaluation of the ESUR PI-RADS scoring system for multiparametric MRI of the prostate with targeted MR/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy at 3.0 Tesla, Eur Radiol, 24, 344, 10.1007/s00330-013-3017-5
Numao, 2013, Usefulness of pre-biopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and clinical variables to reduce initial prostate biopsy in men with suspected clinically localized prostate cancer, J Urol, 190, 502, 10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.3197
Kuru, 2012, Phantom study of a novel stereotactic prostate biopsy system integrating preinterventional magnetic resonance imaging and live ultrasonography fusion, J Endourol, 26, 807, 10.1089/end.2011.0609
Ukimura, 2012, 3-Dimensional elastic registration system of prostate biopsy location by real-time 3-dimensional transrectal ultrasound guidance with magnetic resonance/transrectal ultrasound image fusion, J Urol, 187, 1080
Ahmed, 2011, Characterizing clinically significant prostate cancer using template prostate mapping biopsy, J Urol, 186, 458, 10.1016/j.juro.2011.03.147