Shock Wave Lithotripsy Correlates With Stone Density on Preoperative Computerized Tomography

Johnson, 2003, University of Wisconsin experience using the Doli S lithotriptor, Urology, 62, 410, 10.1016/S0090-4295(03)00555-7 Sheir, 2003, Prospective randomized comparative study of the effectiveness and safety of electrohydraulic and electromagnetic extracorporeal shock wave lithotriptors, J Urol, 170, 389, 10.1097/01.ju.0000075080.58359.46 Fuselier, 1999, Comparison of mobile lithotripters at one institution: Dornier MFL 5000, Dornier Doli and Healthtronics Lithotron, J Endourol, 13, 539, 10.1089/end.1999.13.539 Joseph, 2002, Computerized tomography attenuation value of renal calculus: can it predict successful fragmentation of the calculus by ESWL?, J Urol, 167, 1968, 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65064-1 Pareek, 2003, Hounsfield units on computerized tomography predict stone-free rates after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, J Urol, 169, 1679, 10.1097/01.ju.0000055608.92069.3a Gupta, 2005, Role of computed tomography with no contrast medium enhancement in predicting the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urinary calculi, BJU Int, 95, 1285, 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05520.x Saw, 2000, Helical CT of urinary calculi: effect of stone composition, stone size, and scan collimation, AJR Am J Roentgenol, 175, 329, 10.2214/ajr.175.2.1750329 Williams, 2004, Progress in the use of helical CT for imaging urinary calculi, J Endourol, 18, 937, 10.1089/end.2004.18.937 Nakada, 2000, Determination of stone composition by non-contrast spiral computed tomography in the clinical setting, Urology, 55, 816, 10.1016/S0090-4295(00)00518-5 Mostafavi, 1998, Accurate determination of chemical composition of urinary calculi by spiral computerized tomography, J Urol, 159, 673, 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)63698-X Williams, 2001, Correction of helical CT attenuation values with wide beam collimation: in vitro test with urinary calculi, Acad Radiol, 8, 478, 10.1016/S1076-6332(03)80619-0 Smith, 1996, Diagnosis of acute flank pain: value of unenhanced helical CT, AJR Am J Roentgenol, 166, 97, 10.2214/ajr.166.1.8571915 Teichman, 2000, In vitro comparison of shock wave lithotripsy machines, J Urol, 164, 1259, 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67151-0 Rassweiller, 1989, Wolf Peizolith 2200 versus the modified Dornier HM3, Eur Urol, 16, 1, 10.1159/000471518 Tan, 1991, Comparative studies of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy by Dornier HM3, EDAP LT 01 and Sonolith 2000 devices, J Urol, 146, 294, 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)37774-1 Logarakis, 2000, Variation in clinical outcome following shock wave lithotripsy, J Urol, 163, 721, 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67791-9 Sorensen, 2002, Comparison of intravenous sedation on the efficacy of the Doli 50 lithotriptor, J Urol, 168, 35, 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64826-4 Sorensen, 2002, Is lower pole caliceal anatomy predictive of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy success for primary lower pole kidney stones?, J Urol, 168, 2377, 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64149-3 Pace, 2000, Low success rate of repeat shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones after failed initial treatment, J Urol, 164, 1905, 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)66914-5 Pareek, 2005, Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy success based on body mass index and Hounsfield units, Urology, 65, 33, 10.1016/j.urology.2004.08.004 Williams, 2002, High resolution detection of internal structure in renal calculi by helical computerized tomography, J Urol, 167, 322, 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65462-6 Zarse, 2004, Helical CT accurately reports urinary stone composition using attenuation values: in vitro verification using high resolution micro CT calibrated to FT-IR microspectroscopy, Urology, 63, 828, 10.1016/j.urology.2003.11.038