Thinking about individual actor-level perspectives in sociotechnical transitions: A comment on the transitions research agenda

Ajzen, 1991, The theory of planned behavior, Organ. Behav. Hum. Dec. Proc., 50, 179, 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T Bögel, 2019, Linking socio-technical transition studies and organisational change management: steps towards an integrative, multi-scale heuristic, J. Clean. Prod., 232, 359, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.286 Bögel, 2018, Role of psychology in sociotechnical transitions studies: review in relation to consumption and technology acceptance, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 28, 122, 10.1016/j.eist.2018.01.002 Bögel, P.M.; Upham, P.; Castro, P. (in press): Thinking about the differing contributions of psychology and sociology for understanding sociotechnical transitions perspectives on energy supply and use, Special Issue in Tecnoscienza –Italian Journal of Science and Technology Studies. Davis, 1985 Davis, 1992, Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace 1, J. Appl. Soc. Psychol., 22, 1111, 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x Dovidio, 2015, 216 Fuenfschilling, 2016, The interplay of institutions, actors and technologies in socio-technical systems — an analysis of transformations in the Australian urban water sector, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 103, 298, 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.023 Gazheli, 2015, The behavioral basis of policies fostering long-run transitions: stakeholders, limited rationality and social context, Futures, 69, 14, 10.1016/j.futures.2015.03.008 Geels, 2014, Reconceptualising the co-evolution of firms-in-industries and their environments: developing an inter-disciplinary Triple Embeddedness Framework, Res. Policy, 43, 261, 10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.006 Geels, 2002, Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study, Res. Policy, 31, 1257, 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8 Globisch, 2018, Adoption of electric vehicles in commercial fleets: Why do car pool managers campaign for BEV procurement?, Transp. Res. D Transp. Environ., 64, 122, 10.1016/j.trd.2017.10.010 Grillitsch, 2019, Innovation policy for system-wide transformation: the case of strategic innovation programmes (SIPs) in Sweden, Res. Policy, 48, 1048, 10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.004 Grin, 2010 Hamner, 2008, Agents of change in the disability field: bridge‐builders who make a difference, J. Organ. Change Manag., 21, 161, 10.1108/09534810810856417 Hargreaves, 2013, Up, down, round and round: connecting regimes and practices in innovation for sustainability, Environ. Plan. A, 45, 402, 10.1068/a45124 Jaeger-Erben, 2018 Köhler, 2019, An agenda for sustainability transitions research: state of the art and future directions, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 31, 1, 10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004 Levidow, 2017, Linking the multi-level perspective with social representations theory: gasifiers as a niche innovation reinforcing the energy-from-waste (EfW) regime, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 120, 1, 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.028 Long, 2018, Critical success factors for the transition to business models for sustainability in the food and beverage industry in the Netherlands, J. Clean. Prod., 175, 82, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.067 Lute, 2014, Stewardship as a path to cooperation? Exploring the role of identity in intergroup conflict among Michigan Wolf stakeholders, Hum. Dimens. Wildl., 19, 267, 10.1080/10871209.2014.888600 Roberson, 2019, Diversity in the workplace: a review, synthesis, and future research agenda, Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav., 6, 69, 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012218-015243 Rogers, 1995 Shove, 2010, Beyond the ABC: climate change policy and theories of social change, Environ. Plan. A, 42, 1273, 10.1068/a42282 Sorrell, 2018, Explaining sociotechnical transitions: a critical realist perspective, Res. Policy, 10.1016/j.respol.2018.04.008 Stones, 2005 Svensson, 2018, Structure reconsidered: towards new foundations of explanatory transitions theory, Res. Policy, 47, 462, 10.1016/j.respol.2017.12.007 Taherdoost, 2018, A review of technology acceptance and adoption models and theories, Procedia Manuf., 22, 960, 10.1016/j.promfg.2018.03.137 Tuckman, 1965, Developmental sequence in small groups, Psychol. Bull., 63, 384, 10.1037/h0022100 Upham, 2019 Upham, 2019, Thinking about the differing contributions of (social) psychology and sociology for understanding sociotechnical transitions perspectives on energy supply and use Upham, 2018, Agency and structure in a sociotechnical transition: hydrogen fuel cells, conjunctural knowledge and structuration in Europe, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 37, 163, 10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.040 Upham, 2015, Addressing social representations in socio-technical transitions with the case of shale gas, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 16, 120, 10.1016/j.eist.2015.01.004