Expected Reduction of The Nipple-Areolar Complex Over Time After Treatment of Gynecomastia with Ultrasound-Assisted Liposuction Mastectomy Compared to Subcutaneous Mastectomy Alone
Tóm tắt
The enlarged nipple-areola-complex (NAC) is a characterizing aspect of gynecomastia. The purpose of this study was to multidimensionally quantify the reduction of the NAC after a subcutaneous mastectomy (SCM) with or without ultrasound-assisted liposuction (UAL). A retrospective assessment of patients who underwent SCM +/- UAL due to gynecomastia over a period of 11 years was conducted. The NAC diameters were measured before and after surgery. In addition, a survey (including the BREAST-Q) regarding patient-oriented outcome was performed. The study cohort consisted of 55 men and resulting 105 NACs (SCM n=63, SCM+UAL n=42). It could be shown that the reduction of the NAC considering all parameters (horizontal and vertical diameter and the area) was significantly larger (p=<0.001) in the SCM+UAL compared to the SCM only cohort. The mean reduction of the area in the SCM cohort was 1.60cm2 (SD 1.48) or 23.37% (SD 9.78) after 5.82 years and in the SCM+UAL cohort 2.60cm2 (SD 1.60) or 35.85% (SD 6,86) after 7.43 years. As independent significant factors for reduction of the NAC, the resection weight and SCM+UAL combination were identified. There were no significant differences regarding the patients’ satisfaction measured with the BODY-Q (p=0.222) and the ordinal scale (p=0.445) between the two cohorts. The SCM with UAL showed a larger reduction over time of the NAC compared to the SCM independent from the stage of gynecomastia. When planning the surgical treatment of gynecomastia, a technique and resection weight dependent reduction of the NAC over time must be considered. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full
description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors
www.springer.com/00266
.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Narula HS, Carlson HE (2014) Gynaecomastia–pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment. Nat Rev Endocrinol 10:684–698. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2014.139
Braunstein GD (2007) Clinical practice gynecomastia. N Engl J Med 357:1229–1237. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMcp070677
Wise GJ, Roorda AK, Kalter R (2005) Male breast disease. J Am Coll Surg 200:255–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.09.042
Rosen H, Webb ML, DiVasta AD et al (2010) Adolescent gynecomastia: not only an obesity issue. Ann Plast Surg 64:688–690. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181dba827
Ridha H, Colville RJI, Vesely MJJ (2009) How happy are patients with their gynaecomastia reduction surgery? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 62:1473–1478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2008.04.042
Simon BE, Hoffman S, Kahn S (1973) Classification and surgical correction of gynecomastia. Plast Reconstr Surg 51:48–52. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-197301000-00009
Ordaz DL, Thompson JK (2015) Gynecomastia and psychological functioning: a review of the literature. Body Image 15:141–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2015.08.004
Rew L, Young C, Harrison T et al (2015) A systematic review of literature on psychosocial aspects of gynecomastia in adolescents and young men. J Adolesc 43:206–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.06.007
Nuzzi LC, Firriolo JM, Pike CM et al (2018) The effect of surgical treatment for gynecomastia on quality of life in adolescents. J Adolesc Health 63:759–765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.06.028
Bannayan GA, Hajdu SI (1972) Gynecomastia: clinicopathologic study of 351 cases. Am J Clin Pathol 57:431–437. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/57.4.431
Rohrich RJ, Ha RY, Kenkel JM et al (2003) Classification and management of gynecomastia: defining the role of ultrasound-assisted liposuction. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:909–923. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000042146.40379.25
Johnson RE, Kermott CA, Murad MH (2011) Gynecomastia - evaluation and current treatment options. Ther Clin Risk Manag 7:145–148. https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S10181
Heckmann A, Leclère FM, Vogt PM et al (2011) Chirurgische Therapie bei Gynäkomastie (Surgical therapy of gynecomastia). Chirurg 82(789–94):796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-011-2109-5
Keskin M, Sutcu M, Hanci M et al (2017) Reduction of the areolar diameter after ultrasound-assisted liposuction for gynecomastia. Ann Plast Surg 79:135–138. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000000994
Wong KY, Malata CM (2014) Conventional versus ultrasound-assisted liposuction in gynaecomastia surgery: a 13-year review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 67:921–926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2014.03.004
Koban KC, Frank K, Etzel L et al (2019) 3D mammometric changes in the treatment of idiopathic gynecomastia. Aesthetic Plast Surg 43:616–624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-019-01341-5
Likert R A technique for the measurement of attitudes, The Science Press
Mara JE, Baker JJ, JR, (1978) Diagnosis and treatment of masses in the augmented breast. Rocky Mt Med J 75:255–257
Bengtson BP (2008) Standardizing revision and reoperation reporting. Plast Reconstr Surg 121:1871–1872. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31816b14f1
Webster JP (1946) Mastectomy for gynecomastia through a semicircular intra-areolar incision. Ann Surg 124:557–575
The International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (2018) ISAPS INTERNATIONAL SURVEY ON AESTHETIC/COSMETIC PROCEDURES PERFORMED IN 2017. https://www.isaps.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/ISAPS_2017_International_Study_Cosmetic_Procedures_NEW.pdf
Zocchi ML (1996) Ultrasonic assisted lipoplasty. technical refinements and clinical evaluations. Clin Plast Surg 23:575–598
Rosenberg GJ, Cabrera RC (2000) External ultrasonic lipoplasty: an effective method of fat removal and skin shrinkage. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:785–791. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200002000-00051
Graf R, Auersvald A, Damasio RCC et al (2003) Ultrasound-assisted liposuction: an analysis of 348 cases. Aesthetic Plast Surg 27:146–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-002-1516-x
Nagy MW, Vanek PF (2012) A multicenter, prospective, randomized, single-blind, controlled clinical trial comparing vaser-assisted lipoplasty and suction-assisted lipoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 129:681e-e689. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182442274
Caridi RC (2018) Defining the aesthetic units of the male chest and how they relate to gynecomastia based on 635 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 142:904–907. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000004807