Comparison between robotic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy with modified Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy: A propensity score–matched study

McMillan, 2017, A propensity score-matched analysis of robotic vs open pancreatoduodenectomy on incidence of pancreatic fistula, JAMA Surg, 152, 327, 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4755 Napoli, 2018, Robotic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy: A propensity score-matched analysis based on factors predictive of postoperative pancreatic fistula, Surg Endosc, 32, 1234, 10.1007/s00464-017-5798-0 Watkins, 2018, Multicenter outcomes of robotic reconstruction during the early learning curve for minimally-invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy, HPB (Oxford), 20, 155, 10.1016/j.hpb.2017.08.032 Poves, 2017, Laparoscopic-adapted Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy, Surg Endosc, 31, 2837, 10.1007/s00464-016-5294-y Peng, 2017, Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy, Surg Endosc, 31, 3085, 10.1007/s00464-016-5371-2 Nassour, 2017, Robotic versus laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: A NSQIP analysis, J Gastrointest Surg, 21, 1784, 10.1007/s11605-017-3543-6 Kornaropoulos, 2017, Total robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: A systematic review of the literature, Surg Endosc, 31, 4382, 10.1007/s00464-017-5523-z Guerra, 2016, The role of robotics in widening the range of application of minimally invasive surgery for pancreaticoduodenectomy, Pancreatology, 16, 293, 10.1016/j.pan.2015.12.007 Baker, 2015, Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Role in 2014 and beyond, J Gastrointest Oncol, 6, 396 Cirocchi, 2013, A systematic review on robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy, Surg Oncol, 22, 238, 10.1016/j.suronc.2013.08.003 Boggi, 2013, Feasibility of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy, Br J Surg, 100, 917, 10.1002/bjs.9135 Baker, 2016, Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: Comparison of complications and cost to the open approach, Int J Med Robot, 12, 554, 10.1002/rcs.1688 Buchs, 2011, Robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: A comparative study at a single institution, World J Surg, 35, 2739, 10.1007/s00268-011-1276-3 Zhou, 2011, Outcomes of pancreatoduodenectomy with robotic surgery versus open surgery, Int J Med Robot, 7, 131, 10.1002/rcs.380 Shin, 2017, Totally laparoscopic or robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy versus open surgery for periampullary neoplasms: Separate systematic reviews and meta-analyses, Surg Endosc, 31, 3459, 10.1007/s00464-016-5395-7 Chen, 2015, Robot-assisted laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: A prospective, matched, mid-term follow-up study, Surg Endosc, 29, 3698, 10.1007/s00464-015-4140-y Boggi, 2015, Laparoscopic robot-assisted versus open total pancreatectomy: A case-matched study, Surg Endosc, 29, 1425, 10.1007/s00464-014-3819-9 Bao, 2014, Retrospective comparison of robot-assisted minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary neoplasms, J Gastrointest Surg, 18, 682, 10.1007/s11605-013-2410-3 Lai, 2012, Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy—A comparative study, Int J Surg, 10, 475, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2012.06.003 Austin, 2008, A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003, Stat Med, 27, 2037, 10.1002/sim.3150 Wang, 2016, Comparison of Modified Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy and pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy, HPB (Oxford), 18, 229, 10.1016/j.hpb.2015.09.007 Bassi, 2017, The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after, Surgery, 161, 584, 10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.014 Wente, 2007, Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: A suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS), Surgery, 142, 761, 10.1016/j.surg.2007.05.005 Wente, 2007, Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): An International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition, Surgery, 142, 20, 10.1016/j.surg.2007.02.001 Besselink, 2017, Definition and classification of chyle leak after pancreatic operation: A consensus statement by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery, Surgery, 161, 365, 10.1016/j.surg.2016.06.058 Clavien, 2009, The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: Five-year experience, Ann Surg, 250, 187, 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2 Callery, 2013, A prospectively validated clinical risk score accurately predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy, J Am Coll Surg, 216, 1, 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.09.002 Miller, 2014, A multi-institutional external validation of the fistula risk score for pancreatoduodenectomy, J Gastrointest Surg, 18, 172, 10.1007/s11605-013-2337-8 Gagner, 2009, Laparoscopic Whipple procedure: Review of the literature, J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, 16, 726, 10.1007/s00534-009-0142-2 Boggi, 2015, Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: A systematic literature review, Surg Endosc, 29, 9, 10.1007/s00464-014-3670-z Polanco, 2016, An analysis of risk factors for pancreatic fistula after robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: Outcomes from a consecutive series of standardized pancreatic reconstructions, Surg Endosc, 30, 1523, 10.1007/s00464-015-4366-8 Napoli, 2016, Indications, technique, and results of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy, Updates Surg, 68, 295, 10.1007/s13304-016-0387-7 Zureikat, 2013, 250 robotic pancreatic resections: Safety and feasibility, Ann Surg, 258, 554, 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a4e87c Zureikat, 2016, A multi-institutional comparison of perioperative outcomes of robotic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy, Ann Surg, 264, 640, 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001869