The nature of class II relapse after herbst appliance treatment: A cephalometric long-term investigation

Pancherz, 1979, Treatment of Class II malocclusions by jumping the bite with the Herbst appliance: a cephalometric investigation, Am J Orthod, 76, 423, 10.1016/0002-9416(79)90227-6 Pancherz, 1982, The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment: a cephalometric investigation, Am J Orthod, 82, 104, 10.1016/0002-9416(82)90489-4 Pancherz, 1982, Vertical dentofacial changes during Herbst appliance treatment: a cephalometric investigation, Swed Dent J Suppl, 15, 189 Pancherz, 1985, The Herbst appliance — its biological effects and clinical use, Am J Orthod, 87, 1, 10.1016/0002-9416(85)90169-1 Pancherz, 1989, Die Herbst-Apparatur in der modernen Kieferorthopädie, Inf Orthod Kieferorthop, 21, 467 Pancherz, 1985, Dentofacial orthopedics in relation to somatic maturation: an analysis of 70 consecutive cases treated with the Herbst appliance, Am J Orthod, 88, 273, 10.1016/0002-9416(85)90126-5 Pancherz, 1986, Occlusal changes during and after Herbst treatment: a cephalometric investigation, Eur J Orthod, 8, 215, 10.1093/ejo/8.4.215 Pancherz, 1988, Class II correction in Herbst and Bass therapy: a comparative study considering somatic maturity and skelofacial morphology, Eur J Orthod, 11, 17, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.ejo.a035960 Pancherz, 1988, Lageveränderungen des Condylus mandibulae bei der Herbst-Behandlung: eine röntgenkephalometrische Untersuchung, Inf Orthod Kieferorthop, 21, 515 Pancherz, 1981, The effect of continuous bite jumping on the dentofacial complex: a follow-up study after Herbst appliance treatment of Class II malocclusions, Eur J Orthod, 3, 49, 10.1093/ejo/3.1.49 Björk, 1947, The face in profile, Swed Dent J, 40 Pancherz, 1990, Kritische Analyse der Winkel SNA, SNB und ANB bei der Auswertung von kieferorthopädischen Behandlungen, Fortschr Kieferorthop, 51, 17, 10.1007/BF02168933 Björk, 1983, Normal and abnormal growth of the mandible: a synthesis of longitudinal cephalometric implant studies over a period of 25 years, Eur J Orthod, 5, 1, 10.1093/ejo/5.1.1 Harvold, 1971, Morphogenetic response to activator treatment, Am J Orthod, 60, 478, 10.1016/0002-9416(71)90114-X Björk, 1972, Timing of interceptive orthodontic measures based on stages of maturation, Trans Eur Orthod Soc, 48, 61 Broadbent, 1974 Pancherz, 1989, Morphologie und Lage des Unterkiefers bei der Herbst-Behandlung: eine kephalometrische Analyse der Veränderungen bis zum Wachstumsabschluss, Inf Orthod Kieferorthop, 21, 493 Pancherz, 1988, Mandibular anchorage in Herbst treatment, Eur J Orthod, 10, 149, 10.1093/ejo/10.1.149 Litowitz, 1948, A study of the movement of certain teeth during and following orthodontic treatment, Angle Orthod, 18, 113 Goldstein, 1953, The dominance of the morphogenetic pattern: implications for treatment, Angle Orthod, 23, 187 Mills, 1966, The long-term results of the proclination of lower incisors, Br Dent J, 120, 355 Johnson, 1977, Cases six years posttreatment, Angle Orthod, 47, 210 Rix, 1953, Some observations upon the environment of the incisors, Dent Res, 73, 427 Ballard, 1953, The significance of soft tissue morphology in diagnosis, prognosis and treatment planning, Trans Eur Orthod Soc, 29, 14 Pancherz, 1977, Relapse after activator treatment: a biometric, cephalometric, and electromyographic study of subjects with and without relapse of overjet, Am J Orthod, 5, 499, 10.1016/0002-9416(77)90019-7 Ahlgren, 1978, Early and late electromyographic response to treatment with activators, Am J Orthod, 74, 88, 10.1016/0002-9416(78)90048-9 Pancherz, 1990, The skeletofacial growth pattern: pre- and post-dentofacial orthopedics: a long-term study of Class malocclusions treated with the Herbst appliance, Eur J Orthod, 12, 209, 10.1093/ejo/12.2.209