A Dose-Response Curve Describing the Relationship Between Urban Tree Cover Density and Self-Reported Stress Recovery

Environment and Behavior - Tập 48 Số 4 - Trang 607-629 - 2016
Bin Jiang1,2, Dongying Li2, Linda Larsen2, W. C. Sullivan2
1University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
2University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign , IL USA

Tóm tắt

Although it is well established that viewing nature can help individuals recover from a stressful experience, the dose-response curve describing the relationship between tree cover density and stress recovery is totally unclear. A total of 160 participants engaged in a standard Trier Social Stress Test to induce stress. Participants were then randomly assigned to watch 1 of 10 three-dimensional videos of street scenes that varied in the density of tree cover (from 2% to 62%). Participants completed a Visual Analog Scale questionnaire at three points in the experiment. Analysis revealed a positive, linear association between the density of urban street trees and self-reported stress recovery, adjusted R2 = .05, F(1, 149) = 8.53, p < .01. This relationship holds after controlling for gender, age, and baseline stress levels. A content analysis of participants’ written narratives revealed a similar but even stronger association. These findings suggest that viewing tree canopy in communities can significantly aid stress recovery and that every tree matters.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.5271/sjweh.486

10.3390/ijerph10041250

10.1186/1471-2458-10-456

Bratman G. N., 2012, Year in Ecology and Conservation Biology, 1249, 118

10.1023/A:1025750209553

10.21273/HORTSCI.40.5.1354

10.1111/j.1469-8986.2006.00414.x

10.1007/s00213-008-1359-5

10.1097/00006842-200101000-00002

10.1037/0033-2909.130.3.355

10.1016/j.jacc.2007.12.024

10.1078/1618-8667-00019

10.1016/j.ntt.2010.10.001

10.1177/0013916591231001

10.2466/pr0.96.3c.1025-1028

10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.10.008

10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01602.x

10.1177/00139160121973115

10.1159/000119004

10.1177/0013916598301002

10.1177/0013916501333002

10.1016/j.arcmed.2003.07.007

10.1177/001391659803000601

10.1080/02827580902903341

10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.09.002

10.3758/BRM.41.1.99

10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61689-X

10.1016/j.ufug.2009.06.003

10.1006/jevp.1998.0086

10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61238-0

10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.09.003

10.3390/ijerph10094086

10.1093/jurban/jtg065

10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.04.010

10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.12.005

10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80184-7

10.1089/cyber.2009.0308

10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00497.x

10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.01.002

10.1016/j.psyneuen.2010.08.004

10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.12.015

10.1177/0013916503035003001

10.1177/0956797612464659

10.1097/00008483-200509000-00008