Is micro-percutaneous nephrolithotomy surgery technically feasible and efficient under spinal anesthesia?
Tóm tắt
The objective of the study was to present the clinical and operative effects of two types of anesthesia on micro-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (“microperc”). We retrospectively reviewed 116 patients who underwent microperc between August 2011 and September 2013. Patients were sorted into one of the two groups according to the type of anesthesia received: general (Group 1, n:53) or spinal (Group 2, n:63). Perioperative variables (age, stone size, location) and outcomes (operation time, success, complication rate) were evaluated and compared. Although there was a statistically significant difference in the mean age of patients (30.3 ± 22.1 vs. 45.8 ± 14.6, respectively, p < 0.001), mean body mass indexes were similar (p = 0.689). There was no substantial difference in terms of sizes and localizations of stones in the two groups (p = 0.970 and p = 0.795). While a significant difference was found in comparison of operative times (59.62 ± 32.56 vs. 40.98 ± 26.45 min, p < 0.001), there was no statistically significant difference in mean fluoroscopy times (124.92 ± 84.2 vs. 105.2 ± 61.0 s, p = 0.441). Stone-free rates were similar (90.5 % vs. 93.6 %, p = 0.297). We found no statistical differences between the two groups with respect to mean hemoglobin drop and hospitalization time (p = 0.015 and p = 0.917, respectively). The complication rates and analog pain scores were also similar (p = 0.543 and p = 0.365). Our results show that microperc is a feasible surgical modality in the treatment of kidney stone disease under both spinal and general anesthesia. Spinal anesthesia may be considered for patients at a high risk for general anesthesia, and also may be an alternative for patients who are concerned about and/or fearful of general anesthesia.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bader MJ, Gratzke C, Seitz M et al (2011) The “all-seeing needle”: initial results of an optical puncture system confirming access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 59(6):1054–1059
Desai MR, Sharma R, Mishra S et al (2011) Single-step percutaneous nephrolithotomy (microperc): the initial clinical report. J Urol 186(1):140–145
Tepeler A, Armagan A, Sancaktutar AA et al (2013) The role of microperc in the treatment of symptomatic lower pole renal calculi. J Endourol 27(1):13–18. doi:10.1089/end.2012.0422
Armagan A, Tepeler A, Silay MS et al (2013) Micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of moderate-size renal calculi. J Endourol 27(2):177–181. doi:10.1089/end.2012.0517
Cicek T, Gonulalan U, Dogan R et al (2014) Spinal anesthesia is an efficient and safe anesthetic method for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology. 83(1):50–55. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2013.08.064
Nouralizadeh A, Ziaee SA, Sharifi SH et al (2013) Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy under spinal versus general anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial. J Endourol 27(8):974–978. doi:10.1089/end.2013.0145 Epub 2013 Jul 13
Kuzgunbay B, Turunc T, Akin S et al (2009) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy under general versus combined spinal–epidural anesthesia. J Endourol 23(11):1835–1838. doi:10.1089/end.2009.0261
Rassweiler JJ, Renner C, Eisenberger F (2000) The management of complex stones. BJU Int 86:919–928
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213
Albala DM, Assimos DG, Clayman RV et al (2001) Lower pole I: a prospective randomized trial of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for lower pole nephrolithiasis—initial results. J Urol 166:2072–2080
Hatipoglu NK, Tepeler A, Buldu I et al (2014) Initial experience of micro-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of renal calculi in 140 renal units. Urolithiasis 42(2):159–164. doi:10.1007/s00240-013-0631-2
Mehrabi S, Shirazi KK (2010) Results and complications of spinal anesthesia in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urol J 7:22–25
Aravantinos E, Karatzas A, Gravas S et al (2007) Feasibility of percutaneous nephrolithotomy under assisted local anaesthesia: a prospective study on selected patients with upper urinary tract obstruction. Eur Urol 51:224–227
Akman T, Binbay M, Akcay M et al (2011) Variables that influence operative time during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an analysis of 1897 cases. J Endourol 25(8):1269–1273. doi:10.1089/end.2011.0061
Falahatkar S, Moghaddam KG, Kazemnezhad E et al (2011) Factors affecting operative time during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: our experience with the complete supine position. J Endourol 25(12):1831–1836. doi:10.1089/end.2011.0278
Karacalar S, Bilen CY, Sarihasan B et al (2009) Spinal–epidural anesthesia versus general anesthesia in the management of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy. J Endourol 23(10):1591–1597. doi:10.1089/end.2009.0224