Spilling the beans on understanding and memory for idioms in conversation
Tóm tắt
Three experiments examine people's understanding and memory for idioms. Experiment 1 indicates that in a conversational context, subjects take less time to comprehend conventional uses of idiomatic expression than unconventional, literal uses. Paraphrase judgment errors show that there is a strong bias to interpret idiomatic expressions conventionally when there is no preceding context; however, subjects interpret literal uses of these expressions correctly when there is appropriate context. Experiment 2 showed that in a free recall task, literal uses of idioms are remembered better than conventional uses of these utterances. Experiment 3 indicated that in conversation, literal and idiomatic recall prompts facilitate memory for literal uses of idioms equally well. The results from these experiments suggest that memory for conventional utterances is not as good as for unconventional uses of the same utterances and that subjects understanding unconventional uses of idioms tend to analyze the idiomatic meaning of these expressions before deriving the literal, unconventional interpretation. It is argued that the traditional distinction between literal and metaphoric language is better characterized as a continuum between conventional and unconventional utterances.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Anderson, R. C., &Ortony, A. On putting apples into bottles-A problem of polysemy.Cognitive Psychology, 1975,7, 167–180.
Barclay, J. R., Bransford, J. D., Franks, J. J., Mccarrell, N. S., &Nitsch, K. E. Comprehension and semantic flexibility.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1974,13, 471–481.
Boatner, M. T., Gates, J. E., &Makkai, A.A dictionary of American idioms. New York: Baron's Educational Series, 1975.
Carpenter, P., &Just, M. Sentence comprehension: A psycholinguistic processing model of verification.Psychological Review, 1975,82, 45–73.
Clark, H. Linguistic processes in deductive reasoning.Psychological Review, 1969,74, 387–404.
Clark, H., &Chase, W. On the processes of comparing sentences against picture.Cognitive Psychology, 1972,3, 472–517.
Clark, H. H., &Clark, E. V.Psychology and language. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Jovanovich, 1977.
Clark, H., &Lucy, P. Understanding what is meant from what is said: A study in conversationally conveyed requests.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1975,14, 56–72.
Craik, F. I. M., &Lockhart, R. S. Levels of processing: A framework for memory research.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1972,11, 671–684.
Craik, F. I. M., &Tulving, E. Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1975,104, 268–294.
Gibbs, R. W. Contextual effects in understanding indirect requests.Discourse Processes, 1979,2, 1–10.
Glushko, R., &Cooper, L. Spatial comprehension and comparison processes in verification tasks.Cognitive Psychology, 1978,10, 391–421.
Gordon, D., & Lakoff, G. Conversational postulates. Papers from the Seventh Regional Meeting,Chicago Linguistic Society, 1971, 63-84.
Grice, P. Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.),Syntax and semantics: Speech acts (Vol. 3). New York: Academic Press, 1975.
Honeck, P., Reichmann, P., &Hoffman, R. Semantic memory for metaphor: The conceptual base hypothesis.Memory & Cognition, 1975,3, 409–415.
Jacoby, L. L., &Craik, F. I. M. Effects of elaboration of processing on encoding and retrieval: Trace distinctiveness and recovery of initial context. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.),Levels of processing in human memory. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1979.
Norman, D. A., &Bobrow, D. G. Descriptions: An intermediate stage in memory retrieval.Cognitive Psychology, 1979,11, 107–123.
Ortony, A., Schallert, D. L., Reynolds, R. E., &Antos, S. J. Interpreting metaphors and idioms: Some effects of context on comprehension.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1978,17, 465–467.
Rumelhart, D. E. Toward an interactive model of reading. In S. Dornic (Ed.),Attention and performance VI. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1977.
Rumelhart, D. E. Some problems with the notion of literal meanings. In A. Ortony (Ed.),Metaphor and thought. London: Oxford University Press, 1979.
Tulving, E., &Thompson, D. M. Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory.Psychological Review, 1973,80, 352–373.
Verbrugge, R., &Mccarrell, N. Metaphoric comprehension: Studies in reminding and resembling.Cognitive Psychology, 1977,9, 494–533.