The Impact of Income Inequality on Subjective Well-Being: The Case of China
Tóm tắt
The growing literature on happiness economics suggests that, together with absolute income, individual well-being is affected by relative income both horizontally (i.e. because of differences between an individual’s income and that of others to whom she compares) and vertically (i.e. compared to changes in individuals’ own income). Moreover, the way in which individuals value their relative situation and the distribution of income will determine how inequality affects individual well-being. This paper aims to examine the relationship between these variables in the case of China, focusing mainly on how income inequality affects subjective well-being. Using data from the CGSS, the results suggest that both absolute and relative income affect subject well-being, and that an inverted-U shaped relationship between income inequality and individual well-being appears at least for urban residents, whereas this relationship tend to be negative in the case of people living in rural areas.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Alesina, A., Di Tella, R., & MacCulloch, R. (2004). Inequality and happiness: Are Europeans and Americans different? Journal of Public Economics, 88(9–10), 2009–2042.
Appleton, S., & Song, L. (2008). Life satisfaction in urban China: Components and determinants. World Development, 36, 2325–2340.
Asadullah, M. N., Xiao, S., & Yeoh, E. (2018). Subjective well-being in China, 2005–2010: The role of relative income, gender, and location. China Economic Review, 48, 83–101.
Bartolini, S., & Sarracino, F. (2015). The dark side of Chinese growth: Declining social capital and well-being in times of economic boom. World Development, 74, 333–351.
Brockmann, H., Delhey, J., Welzel, C., & Yuan, H. (2009). The China puzzle: Falling happiness in a rising economy. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10(4), 387–405.
Clark, A. E. (2003). Inequality-aversion and income mobility: A direct test. DELTA working paper, 2003-11.
Clark, A. E., Frijters, P., & Shields, M. A. (2008). Relative income, happiness, and utility: An explanation for the Easterlin paradox and other puzzles. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(1), 95–144.
Clark, A. E., & Oswald, A. J. (1996). Satisfaction and comparison income. Journal of Public Economics, 61, 359–381.
Deaton, A. (2008). Income, health, and well-being around the world: Evidence from the Gallup World Poll. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22, 53–72.
Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Scollon, C. N. (2009). Beyond the hedonic treadmill: Revising the adaptation theory of well-being. In E. Diener (Ed.), The science of well-being. Social indicators research series (Vol. 37). Dordrecht: Springer.
Diener, E. D., & Diener, C. (1995). The wealth of nations revisited: Income and quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 36, 275–286.
Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy: A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, 94–122.
Duesenberry, J. S. (1949). Income, saving and the theory of consumer behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Easterlin, R. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? In P. A. David & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honor of moses abramovitz. New York: Academic Press.
Easterlin, R. (1995). Will raising the incomes of all increase happiness of all? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 27, 35–47.
Easterlin, R., Morgan, R., Switek, M., & Wang, F. (2012). China’s life satisfaction, 1990–2010. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(25), 9775–9780.
Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), 817–868.
Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2005). Income and well-being: An empirical analysis of the comparison income effect. Journal of Public Economics, 89, 997–1019.
Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A., & Frijters, P. (2004). How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness? The Economic Journal, 114(497), 641–659.
Frank, R. H. (1985). Choosing the right pond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). What can economists learn from happiness research? Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 402–435.
Graham, C., & Felton, A. (2006). Inequality and happiness: Insights from Latin America. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 4(1), 107–122.
Graham, C., & Pettinato, S. (2002). Frustrated achievers: Winners, losers and subjective well-being in new market economies. Journal of Development Studies, 38, 100–140.
Han, C. (2015). Explaining the subjective well-being of urban and rural Chinese: Income, personal concerns, and societal evaluations. Social Science Research, 49, 179–190.
Hirschman, A. O., & Rothschild, M. (1973). The changing tolerance for income inequality in the course of economic development with a mathematical appendix. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87, 544–566.
Hsu, B., Zhang, W., & Kim, C. (2017). Surveying happiness in China: Comparing measures of subjective well-being. The Journal of Chinese Sociology, 4, 14.
Jiang, S., Lu, M., & Sato, H. (2012). Identity, inequality, and happiness: Evidence from urban China. World Development, 40(6), 1190–1200.
Knight, J., Song, L., & Gunatilaka, R. (2009). Subjective well-being and its determinants in rural China. China Economic Review, 20(4), 635–649.
Li, J., & Raine, J. W. (2014). The time trend of life satisfaction in China. Social Indicators Research, 116(2), 409–427.
Pollak, R. A. (1976). Interdependent preferences. American Economic Review, 66, 309–320.
Song, Y. (2014). What should economist know about the current Chinese hukou system? China Economic Review, 29, 200–212.
Wang, P., Pan, J., & Luo, Z. (2015). The impact of income inequality on individual happiness: Evidence from China. Social Indicators Research, 121, 413–435.
Wu, X. G., & Li, J. (2013). Economic growth, income inequality and subjective well-being: Evidence from China. Population Studies Center Research Report 13-796.