Occlusal stability of adult Class II Division 1 treatment with the Herbst appliance

Niko Christian Bock1, Julia von Bremen1, Sabine Ruf2
1Assistant professor, Department of Orthodontics, University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany
2Professor and chair, Department of Orthodontics, University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany

Tài liệu tham khảo

Ruf, 2006, Herbst/multibracket appliance treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions in early and late adulthood. A prospective cephalometric study of consecutively treated subjects, Eur J Orthod, 28, 352, 10.1093/ejo/cji116 Ruf, 1998, Kiefergelenkwachstumsadaptation bei jungen erwachsenen während behandlung mit der Herbst-apparatur. Eine prospektive magnetresonanztomographische und kephalometrische studie, Inf Orthod Kieferorthop, 30, 735 Ruf, 1999, Dentoskeletal effects and facial profile changes in young adults treated with the Herbst appliance, Angle Orthod, 69, 239 Ruf, 1999, Temporomandibular joint remodeling in adolescents and young adults during Herbst treatment: a prospective longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging and cephalometric radiographic investigation, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 115, 607, 10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70285-4 Ruf, 2003, When is the ideal period for Herbst therapy—early or late?, Semin Orthod, 9, 47, 10.1053/sodo.2003.34024 Pancherz, 2000, Dentofacial orthopedics or orthognathic surgery: is it a matter of age?, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 117, 571, 10.1016/S0889-5406(00)70203-4 Pancherz, 2000, The Herbst appliance—research based updated clinical possibilities, World J Orthod, 1, 17 Bondemark, 2007, Long-term stability of orthodontic treatment and patient satisfaction, Angle Orthod, 77, 181, 10.2319/011006-16R.1 McNamara, 2003, Histologic changes associated with the Herbst appliance in adult rhesus monkeys (Macacca mulatta), Semin Orthod, 9, 26, 10.1053/sodo.2003.34022 Rabie, 2004, Forward mandibular positioning enhances condylar adaptation in adult rats, Eur J Orthod, 26, 353, 10.1093/ejo/26.4.353 Xiong, 2004, The effect of continuous bite-jumping in adult rats: a morphological study, Angle Orthod, 74, 86 Ruf, 2004, Orthognathic surgery and dentofacial orthopedics in adult Class II Division 1 treatment: mandibular sagittal split osteotomy versus Herbst appliance, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 126, 140, 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.02.011 Cassidy, 1993, A comparison of surgery and orthodontics in “borderline” adults with Class II division 1 malocclusions, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 104, 455, 10.1016/0889-5406(93)70072-V Mihalik, 2003, Long-term follow-up of Class II adults treated with orthodontic camouflage: a comparison with orthognathic surgery outcomes, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 123, 266, 10.1067/mod.2003.43 Hägg, 1980, Skeletal stages of the hand and wrist as indicators of the pubertal growth spurt, Acta Odontol Scand, 38, 187, 10.3109/00016358009004719 Dahlberg, 1940 Andrews, 1989 Pancherz, 1994, Früh-oder spätbehandlung mit der Herbst-apparatur—stabilität oder rezidiv, Inf Orthod Kieferorthop, 26, 437 Pancherz, 1991, The nature of Class II relapse after Herbst appliance treatment: a cephalometric long-term investigation, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 100, 220, 10.1016/0889-5406(91)70059-6 Fidler, 1995, Long-term stability of Angle Class II Division 1 malocclusions with successful occlusal results at end of active treatment, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 107, 276, 10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70143-5 Ormiston, 2005, Retrospective analysis of long-term stable and unstable orthodontic treatment outcomes, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 128, 568, 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.07.047 Pangrazio-Kulbersh, 2001, Stability of skeletal Class II correction with 2 surgical techniques: the sagittal split ramus osteotomy and the total mandibular subapical alveolar osteotomy, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 120, 134, 10.1067/mod.2001.113792