Ionization chamber gradient effects in nonstandard beam configurations

Medical Physics - Tập 36 Số 10 - Trang 4654-4663 - 2009
Hugo Bouchard1, Jan Seuntjens2, Jean‐François Carrier1, I. Kawrakow3
1Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
2Medical Physics Unit, Montreal General Hospital (L5‐113), McGill University, 1650 Cedar Avenue, Montreal, Quebec H3G 1A4, Canada
3National Research Council of Canada (NRC), Ionizing Radiation Standards (M‐35), 1200 Montreal Road, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0R6, Canada

Tóm tắt

Purpose:For the purpose of nonstandard beam reference dosimetry, the current concept of reporting absorbed dose at a point in water located at a representative position in the chamber volume is investigated in detail. As new nonstandard beam reference dosimetry protocols are under development, an evaluation of the role played by the definition of point of measurement could lead to conceptual improvements prior to establishing measurement procedures.Methods:The present study uses the current definition of reporting absorbed dose to calculate ionization chamber perturbation factors for two cylindrical chamber models (Exradin A12 and A14) using the Monte Carlo method. The EGSnrc based user‐code EGS̱chamber is used to calculate chamber dose responses of 14 IMRT beams chosen to cause considerable dose gradients over the chamber volume as previously used byBouchard and Seuntjens [“ Ionization chamber‐based reference dosimetry of intensity modulated radiation beams,” Med. Phys. 31(9), 2454–5465 (2004)].Results:The study shows conclusively the relative importance of each physical effect involved in the nonstandard beam correction factors of 14 IMRT beams. Of all correction factors involved in the dosimetry of the beams studied, the gradient perturbation correction factor has the highest magnitude, on average, 11% higher compared to reference conditions for the Exradin A12 chamber and about 5% higher for the Extradin A14 chamber. Other perturbation correction factors (i.e.,, , and ) are, on average, less than 0.8% different from reference conditions for the chambers and beams studied. The current approach of reporting measured absorbed dose at a point in water coinciding with the location of the centroid of the chamber is the main factor responsible for large correction factors in nonstandard beam deliveries (e.g., intensity modulated radiation therapy) reported in literature.Conclusions:To reduce or eliminate the magnitude of perturbation correction factors in nonstandard beam reference dosimetry, two possible ways to report absorbed dose are suggested: (1) Reporting average dose to the sensitive volume of the chamber filled with water, combined with removing the reference field implicit gradient effect when measuring output factors, and (2) reporting average dose to the chamber itself during output factor verifications. The first option could be adopted if clinical beam correction factors are negligible. The second option could simplify quality assurance procedures when correction factors are not negligible and have to be calculated using Monte Carlo simulations.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

HPA, 1960, Code of practice for x‐ray measurements, Phys. Vib., 33, 55

10.1088/0031‐9155/9/4/302

10.1088/0031‐9155/11/4/301

10.1088/0031‐9155/14/1/001

HPA “A practical guide to electron dosimetry ” HPA Report Series No. 4 1971.

10.1088/0031‐9155/16/3/301

NACP, 1972, Procedures in radiation therapy dosimetry with electrons and roentgen and gamma rays with maximum photon energies between 1 and, Acta Radiol. Ther. Phys. Biol., 2, 603

HPA “Practical guide to electron dosimetry belowfor radiotherapy purposes ” HPA Report Series No. 13 1975.

10.1118/1.594133

NACP, 1980, Procedures in external radiation therapy dosimetry with electron and photon beams with maximum energies between 1 and, Acta Radiol. Oncol., 19, 58

10.1118/1.595446

International Atomic Energy Agency “Absorbed dose determination in photon and electron beams: An international code of practice ” IAEA Report No. TRS‐277 1987.

10.1118/1.598691

International Atomic Energy Agency “Absorbed dose determination in external beam Radiotherapy: An international code of practice for dosimetry based on standards of absorbed dose to Water ” IAEA Report No. TRS‐398 2001.

International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements “Prescribing Recording and Reporting Photon Beam Therapy ” ICRU Report No. 50 1993.

International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements “Radiation Quantities and Units ” ICRU Report No. 33 1980.

10.1118/1.2201147

10.1118/1.2839329

10.1118/1.1781333

10.1118/1.1767691

10.1088/0031‐9155/48/14/304

10.1118/1.3005481

10.1118/1.2161403

10.1088/0031‐9155/53/11/005

10.1088/0031‐9155/54/9/024

10.1088/0031‐9155/23/1/002

10.1118/1.598917

10.1118/1.2874554

I.Kawrakow “egspp: The EGSnrc C++ class library ” NRCC Report No. PIRS‐899 2005.

10.1118/1.597552

D. W. O.Rogers B.Walters andI.Kawrakow “BEAMnrc users manual ionizing radiation standards ” National Research Council of Canada Ottawa NRC Report No. PIRS‐509 2006.

10.2307/3570368

10.1088/1742‐6596/102/1/012023

10.1118/1.1536290

10.1088/0031‐9155/50/5/018

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Medical Physics

Tập 36 Số 10

4654-4663

Thông tin tác giả