Do people really want to be nudged towards healthy lifestyles?
Tóm tắt
This paper assesses Thaler and Sunstein’s claim that policies that nudge individuals towards healthy lifestyles promote the welfare of those individuals, as judged by themselves. I argue that Thaler and Sunstein switch between two different interpretations of that clause. One interpretation gives the clause a wide range of applicability, but drains it of its content as a repudiation of paternalism. The other interpretation makes it more meaningful to say that people want to make the choices they are being nudged towards, but applies to a much narrower range of cases than Thaler and Sunstein have in mind.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bernheim D, Rangel A (2009) Beyond revealed preference: choice- theoretic foundations for behavioral welfare economics. Q J Econ 124:51–104
Bershears J, Choi J, Laibson D, Madrian B (2008) How are preferences revealed? J Public Econ 92:1787–1794
Bleichrodt H, Pinto-Prades J-L, Wakker P (2001) Making descriptive use of prospect theory to improve the prescriptive use of expected utility. Manage Sci 47:1498–1514
Camerer C, Issacharoff S, Loewenstein G, O’Donaghue T, Rabin M (2003) Regulation for conservatives: behavioral economics and the case for ‘asymmetric paternalism’. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 151:1211–1254
Cialdini R (1984) Influence: the psychology of persuasion. Quill Press, New York
Festinger L (1957) A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press, Stanford
Hausman D (2012) Preference, value, choice, and welfare. Cambridge University Press, New York
Infante G, Lecouteux G, Sugden R (2016) Preference purification and the inner rational agent: a critique of the conventional wisdom of behavioural welfare economics. J Econ Methodol 23:1–25
Kahneman D (2003) A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. Am Psychol 58:697–720
Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York
Kőszegi B, Rabin M (2007) Mistakes in choice-based welfare analysis. Am Econ Rev 97:477–481
Le Grand J, New B (2015) Government paternalism: Nanny State or helpful friend. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Loewenstein G (1996) Out of control: visceral influences on behaviour. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 65:272–292
Murakami K, Livingstone B (2015) Prevalence and characteristics of misreporting of energy intake in US adults: NHANES 2003–2012. Br J Nutr 114:1294–1303
Salant Y, Rubinstein A (2008) (A, f): choice with frames. Rev Econ Stud 75:1287–1296
Sugden R (2008) Why incoherent preferences do not justify paternalism. Const Polit Econ 19:226–248
Sugden R (2009) On nudging: a review of nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness, by Richard H. Thaler and Cass R. Sunstein. Int J Econ Busin 16:365–373
Thaler R (2015) Misbehaving: how economics became behavioural. Allen Lane, London
Thaler R, Sunstein C (2008) Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press, New Haven
Tversky A, Kahneman D (1973) Availability: a heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cogn Psychol 5:207–232