EIA scoping in England and Wales: Practitioner approaches, perspectives and constraints

Environmental Impact Assessment Review - Tập 26 - Trang 221-241 - 2006
Graham Wood1, John Glasson1, Julia Becker1
1Impacts Assessment Unit, Department of Planning, School of the Built Environment, Oxford Brookes University, Gipsy Lane, Oxford OX3 0BP, UK

Tài liệu tham khảo

Baxter, 2001, Improving the practice of cumulative effects assessment in Canada, Impact Assess Proj Apprais, 19, 253, 10.3152/147154601781766916 Chadwick, 2002, Socio-economic impacts: are they still the poor relations in UK EISs?, J Environ Plan Manag, 45, 3, 10.1080/09640560120100169 Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ), 1997 Department of the Environment (DoE), 1995 Department of the Environment (DoE), 1996 Department of the Environment Transport and the Regions (DETR), 1999 Department of the Environment Transport and the Regions (DETR). Environmental Impact Assessment: Guide to Procedures; 2000. http://www.odpm.gov.uk/stellent/groups/odpm_planning/documents/page/odpm_plan_026667.hcsp (last accessed January 14th, 2005). Environment Agency, 2002 European Commission (EC), 1997, Council directive 97/11/EC of 3 March 1997 amending directive 85/337/EEC on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment, Off J Eur Communities, L, 73, 5 European Commission (EC), 2000 European Commission (EC). Report From the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the Application and Effectiveness of the EIA Directive; 2003. http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/eia/report_en.pdf (last accessed January 14th, 2005). Glasson, 1999 Jennings, 1998 Jones, 1999, Screening, scoping and consideration of alternatives, 201 Kennedy, 1992, An approach to integrate impact scoping with environmental impact assessment, Environ Manage, 16, 475, 10.1007/BF02394123 McNab, 1997, Scoping and public participation, 60 Mulvihill, 2003, Expanding the scoping community, Environ Impact Asses Rev, 23, 39, 10.1016/S0195-9255(02)00039-2 Mulvihill, 2001, Ambitious and restrictive scoping: case studies from Northern Canada, Environ Impact Asses Rev, 21, 363, 10.1016/S0195-9255(01)00079-8 Mulvihill, 1998, Using scoping as a design process, Environ Impact Asses Rev, 18, 351, 10.1016/S0195-9255(98)00013-4 Office of Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM)/Local Government Association (LGA), 2004, Vol 1, 2 Palerm, 2000, An empirical–theoretical analysis framework for public participation in environmental impact assessment, J Environ Plan Manag, 43, 581, 10.1080/713676582 Piper, 2001, Assessing the cumulative effects of project clusters: a comparison of process and methods in four UK cases, J Environ Plan Manag, 44, 357, 10.1080/09640560120046115 Pritchard, 1993, Towards sustainability in the planning process: the role of EIA, ECOS (Br Assoc Nat Conserv), 14, 10 Sadler, 1996, Environmental assessment in a changing world: evaluating practice to improve performance Weston, 2000, EIA, decision-making theory and screening and scoping in UK practice, J Environ Plan Manag, 43, 185, 10.1080/09640560010667 Weston, J. Screening, Scoping and ES Review Under the 1999 EIA Regulations. Working Paper No. 184. Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK; 2000b. Wood, 2003