GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence—publication bias

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology - Tập 64 Số 12 - Trang 1277-1282 - 2011
Gordon Guyatt1, Andrew D Oxman2, Víctor M. Montori3, Gunn Elisabeth Vist2, Regina Kunz4, Jan Brożek5, Pablo Alonso‐Coello6, Benjamin Djulbegović7, David Atkins8, Yngve Falck–Ytter9, John W Williams10, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson11, Susan L. Norris12, Elie A. Akl13, Holger J. Schünemann5
1Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario L8N 3Z5, Canada
2Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, PO Box 7004, St Olavs plass, 0130 Oslo, Norway
3Knowledge and Encounter Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
4Basel Institute of Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital Basel Hebelstrasse 10, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
5Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario L8N 3Z5, Canada
6Iberoamerican Cochrane Center-Servicio de Epidemiología Clínica y Salud Pública and CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Hospital de Sant Pau, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona 08041, Spain
7Center for Evidence-based Medicine and Health Outcomes Research, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
8Department of Veterans Affairs, QUERI Program, Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC, USA
9Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Case and VA Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
10Durham VA Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27705, USA
11German Cochrane Center, Institute of Medical Biometry and Medical Informatics, University Medical Center Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany
12Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239-3098, USA
13Department of Medicine, State University of New York at Buffalo, New York, NY, USA

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Montori, 2008, Reporting bias

Hopewell, 2009, Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 10.1002/14651858.MR000006.pub3

Dickersin, 1992, Factors influencing publication of research results. Follow-up of applications submitted to two institutional review boards, JAMA, 267, 374, 10.1001/jama.267.3.374

Stern, 1997, Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects, BMJ, 315, 640, 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.640

Bardy, 1998, Bias in reporting clinical trials, Br J Clin Pharmacol, 46, 147, 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1998.00759.x

Egger, 1998, Bias in location and selection of studies, BMJ, 316, 61, 10.1136/bmj.316.7124.61

Song, 2000, Publication and related biases, Health Technol Assess, 4, 1, 10.3310/hta4100

Hopewell, 2008, Time to publication for results of clinical trials, Cochrane Database Syst Rev

Egger, 1997, Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German, Lancet, 350, 326, 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)02419-7

Juni, 2002, Direction and impact of language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials: empirical study, Int J Epidemiol, 31, 115, 10.1093/ije/31.1.115

Hopewell, 2007, Grey literature in meta-analyses of randomized trials of health care interventions, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 10.1002/14651858.MR000010.pub3

Rennie, 1999, Fair conduct and fair reporting of clinical trials, JAMA, 282, 1766, 10.1001/jama.282.18.1766

Tramer, 1997, Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study, BMJ, 315, 635, 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.635

Melander, 2003, Evidence b(i)ased medicine—selective reporting from studies sponsored by pharmaceutical industry: review of studies in new drug applications, BMJ, 326, 1171, 10.1136/bmj.326.7400.1171

von Elm, 2004, Different patterns of duplicate publication: an analysis of articles used in systematic reviews, JAMA, 291, 974, 10.1001/jama.291.8.974

Vaitkus, 2007, N-acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy: publication bias perpetuated by meta-analyses, Am Heart J, 153, 275, 10.1016/j.ahj.2006.09.014

Begg, 1989, Publication bias and dissemination of clinical research, J Natl Cancer Inst, 81, 107, 10.1093/jnci/81.2.107

Egger, 1997, Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test, BMJ, 315, 629, 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629

Ioannidis, 2005, Why most published research findings are false, PLoS Med, 2, e124, 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124

Cappelleri, 1996, Large trials vs meta-analysis of smaller trials: how do their results compare?, JAMA, 276, 1332, 10.1001/jama.276.16.1332

Sutton, 2000, Empirical assessment of effect of publication bias on meta-analyses, BMJ, 320, 1574, 10.1136/bmj.320.7249.1574

Ioannidis, 1998, Effect of the statistical significance of results on the time to completion and publication of randomized efficacy trials, JAMA, 279, 281, 10.1001/jama.279.4.281

Lexchin, 2003, Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review, BMJ, 326, 1167, 10.1136/bmj.326.7400.1167

Lurie, 2005, Misleading data analyses in salmeterol (SMART) study, Lancet, 366, 1261, 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67518-6

Nelson, 2006, The Salmeterol Multicenter Asthma Research Trial: a comparison of usual pharmacotherapy for asthma or usual pharmacotherapy plus salmeterol, Chest, 129, 15, 10.1378/chest.129.1.15

Mitka, 2008, Controversies surround heart drug study: questions about vytorin and trial sponsors’ conduct, JAMA, 299, 885, 10.1001/jama.299.8.885

Rising, 2008, Reporting bias in drug trials submitted to the Food and Drug Administration: review of publication and presentation, PLoS Med, 5, e217, 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050217

Turner, 2008, Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy, N Engl J Med, 358, 252, 10.1056/NEJMsa065779

Begg, 1988, Publication bias: a problem in interpreting medical data, J R Statist Soc A, 151, 419, 10.2307/2982993

Begg, 1994, Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias, Biometrics, 50, 1088, 10.2307/2533446

Terrin, 2005, In an empirical evaluation of the funnel plot, researchers could not visually identify publication bias, J Clin Epidemiol, 58, 894, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.01.006

Lau, 2006, The case of the misleading funnel plot, BMJ, 333, 597, 10.1136/bmj.333.7568.597

Peters, 2008, Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry, J Clin Epidemiol, 61, 991, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.010

Irwig, 1998, Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Graphical test is itself biased, BMJ, 316, 470

Stuck, 1998, Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Asymmetry detected in funnel plot was probably due to true heterogeneity, BMJ, 316, 469, 10.1136/bmj.316.7129.469

Seagroatt, 1998, Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Test had 10% positive rate, BMJ, 316, 470

Hedges, 1996, Estimating effect size under publication bias: small sample properties and robustness of a random effects selection model, J Educ Behav Stat, 21, 299, 10.3102/10769986021004299

Vevea, 1995, A general linear model for estimating effect size in the presence of publication bias, Psychometrika, 60, 419, 10.1007/BF02294384

Ioannidis, 1999, Recursive cumulative meta-analysis: a diagnostic for the evolution of total randomized evidence from group and individual patient data, J Clin Epidemiol, 52, 281, 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00159-0

Pan, 2011, Local literature bias in genetic epidemiology: an empirical evaluation of the Chinese literature, PLoS Med, 2, e334, 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020334

Man-Son-Hing, 1998, Quinine for nocturnal leg cramps: a meta-analysis including unpublished data, J Gen Intern Med, 13, 600, 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00182.x

Cranney, 2002, Meta-analyses of therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis. II. Meta-analysis of alendronate for the treatment of postmenopausal women, Endocr Rev, 23, 508, 10.1210/er.2001-2002

DeAngelis, 2004, Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, JAMA, 292, 1363, 10.1001/jama.292.11.1363

Gulmezoglu, 2005, WHO facilitates international collaboration in setting standards for clinical trial registration, Lancet, 365, 1829, 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66589-0

Laine, 2007, Clinical trial registration—looking back and moving ahead, N Engl J Med, 356, 2734, 10.1056/NEJMe078110

Easterbrook, 1991, Publication bias in clinical research, Lancet, 337, 867, 10.1016/0140-6736(91)90201-Y

Altman, 2001, Systematic reviews of evaluations of prognostic variables, BMJ, 323, 224, 10.1136/bmj.323.7306.224

Alonso-Coello, 2006, Meta-analysis of flavonoids for the treatment of haemorrhoids, Br J Surg, 93, 909, 10.1002/bjs.5378