Contested world order: The delegitimation of international governance

The Review of International Organizations - Tập 14 - Trang 731-743 - 2018
Liesbet Hooghe1, Tobias Lenz2,3, Gary Marks1
1Department of Political Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA
2Institute of Political Science, University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
3GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Hamburg, Germany

Tóm tắt

This article argues that the chief challenge to international governance is an emerging political cleavage, which pits nationalists against immigration, free trade, and international authority. While those on the radical left contest international governance for its limits, nationalists reject it in principle. A wide-ranging cultural and economic reaction has reshaped political conflict in Europe and the United States and is putting into question the legitimacy of the rule of law among states.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Acharya, A. (2014). The end of the American world order. London: Polity Press. Alvarez, J. E. (2005). International organizations as law-makers. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Anderson, B., Bernauer, T., & Kachi, A. (2019). Does international pooling of authority affect the perceived legitimacy of global governance? Review of International Organization [this issue]. Autor, D., Dorn, D., Hanson, G., & Majlesi, K. (2017). “Importing political polarization? The electoral consequences of rising trade exposure.” MIT Working Paper. Ballard-Rosa, C., Jensen, A., & Scheve, K. (2018). “Economic decline, social identity, and authoritarian values in the United States.” Paper presented at the American Political Science Association, Boston. Baumgarten, B. (2017). The global justice movement: Resistance to dominant economic models of globalization. In S. Berger & H. Nehring (Eds.), The history of social movements in global perspective (pp. 647–676). London: Palgrave Macmillan. Bechtel, M., Hainmueller, J., & Margalit, Y. (2014). Preferences for international redistribution: The divide over the Eurozone bailout. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 835–856. Bexell, M., Tallberg, J., & Uhlin, A. (2010). Democracy in global governance: The promises and pitfalls of transnational actors. Global Governance, 16(1), 81–101. Bingham, T. (2010). The rule of law. London: Allen Lane. Bow, B., & Santa Cruz, A. (2015). Polls, parties, politicization, and the evolution of North American regional governance. In B. Bow & G. Anderson (Eds.), Regional governance in post-NAFTA North America (pp. 178–206). New York: Routledge. Briceño Ruiz, J. (2007). Strategic regionalism and regional social policy in the FTAA process. Global Social Policy, 7(3), 294–315. Burgoon, B. (2009). Globalization and political-economic backlash: Polanyi’s revenge? Review of International Political Economy, 16(2), 145–177. Caporaso, J., & Tarrow, S. (2009). Polanyi in Brussels: Supranational institutions and the transnational embedding of markets. International Organization, 63(4), 593–620. Carter, Z. (2016). Bernie Sanders says he would renegotiate NAFTA, not violate it. Huffington Post, 04/08/2016. Cerrato, A., Ferrara, F. M., & Ruggieri, F. (2018). Why does import competition favor republicans? Localized trade shocks, voting behavior, and scapegoating in the U.S. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3147169. Accessed 14 Nov 2018. Checkel, J. T. (2005). International institutions and socialization in Europe: Introduction and framework. International Organization, 59(4), 801–826. Conceição-Heldt, E. d. (2013). Two-level games and trade cooperation: What do we now know? International Politics, 50(4), 579–599. De Vries, C. E. (2018). The cosmopolitan-parochial divide: Changing patterns of party and electoral competition in the Netherlands and beyond. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(11), 1541–1565. Della Porta, D. (Ed.). (2007). The global justice movement: Crossnational and transnational perspectives. Oxon: Routledge. Diamond, L., Plattner, M. F., & Walker, C. (Eds.). (2016). Authoritarianism goes global: The challenge to democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University. Dingwerth, K., Lehmann, I., Reichel, E., Weise, T., & Witt, A. (2015). Many pipers, many tunes? Die Legitimitätskommunikation internationaler Organisationen in komplexen Umwelten. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 49, 186–212. Ecker-Ehrhardt, M. (2014). Why parties politicise international institutions: On globalisation backlash and authority contestation. Review of International Political Economy, 21(6), 1275–1312. Ecker-Ehrhardt, M. (2018). Self-legitimation in the face of politicization: Why international organizations centralized public communication. Review of International Organizations 13(4), 519–546. French, J. D. (2002). From the suites to the streets: The unexpected re-emergence of the ‘labor question,’ 1994-1999. Labor History, 43(3), 285–304. Gidron, N., & Hall, P. (2017). The politics of social status: Economic and cultural roots of the populist right. British Journal of Sociology, 68(S1), 57–84. Golder, M. (2016). Far right parties in Europe. Annual Review of Political Science, 19, 477–497. Goldstein, J., Kahler, M., Keohane, R. O., & Slaughter, A.-M. (2000). Legalization and world politics. International Organization, 54(3), 385–399. Grugel, J. (2007). Regionalist governance and transnational collective action in Latin America. Economy and Society, 35(2), 209–231. Haggard, S., & Kaufman, R. (Eds.). (1992). The politics of economic adjustment. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Häusermann, S., & Kriesi, H. (2015). What do voters want? Dimensions and configurations in individual-level preferences and party choice. In P. Beramendi, S. Häusermann, H. Kitschelt, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The politics of advanced capitalism (pp. 202–230). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hetherington, M., & Weiler, J. (2018). Prius or pickup? How the answers to four simple questions explain America’s great divide. New York: Harcourt Publishing. Higgott, R. (2000). Contested globalization: The changing context and normative challenges. Review of International Studies, 26(5), 131–153. Hobolt, S. B. (2017). The Brexit vote: A divided nation, a divided continent. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(9), 1259–1277. Hobolt, S. B., Leeper, T., & Tilley, J. (2018). “Divided by the vote: Affective polarization in the wake of Brexit.” Paper presented at the American Political Science Association, Boston. Hochschild, A. R. (2016). Strangers in their own land. New York: New Press. Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (1999). Making of a polity: The struggle over European integration. In H. Kitschelt, G. Marks, P. Lange, & J. Stephens (Eds.), Continuity and change in contemporary capitalism (pp. 70–79). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2009). A Postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 1–23. Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2018). Cleavage theory meets Europe’s crisis: Lipset, Rokkan, and the transnational cleavage. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(1), 109–135. Hooghe, L., Marks, G., Lenz, T., Bezuijen, J., Ceka, B., & Derderyan, S. (2017). Measuring international authority: A Postfunctionalist theory of governance, Vol. III. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hooghe, L., Lenz, T., & Marks, G. (2019). A theory of international organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hurrelmann, A., & Schneider, S. (Eds.). (2015). The Legitimacy of Regional Integration in Europe and the Americas. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. Ikenberry, G. J. (2010). The Liberal order and its discontents. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 38(3), 509–521. Ikenberry, G. J. (2015). The future of the Liberal world order. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 16(3), 450–455. Inglehart, R. F., & Norris, P. (2016). Trump, Brexit, and the rise of populism: Economic have-nots and cultural backlash. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia. Jensen, J. B., Quinn, D. P., & Weymouth, S. (2017). Winners and losers in international trade: The effects on US presidential voting. International Organization, 71(3), 423–457. Jönsson, C., & Tallberg, J. (Eds.). (2010). Transnational actors in global governance: Patterns, explanations, and implications. London: Palgrave MacMillan. Jost, J., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307–337. Kahler, M. (2013). Rising powers and global governance: Negotiating change in a resilient status quo. International Affairs, 89(3), 711–729. Kaldor, M. (2000). ‘Civilising’ globalisation? The implications of the ‘battle in Seattle.’ Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 29(1), 105–114. Kay, T. (2015). New challenges, new alliances: Union politicization in a post-NAFTA era. Labor History, 56(3), 246–269. Keck, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Kissinger, H. (2014). World Order. New York: Penguin Press. Koremenos, B., Lipson, C., & Snidal, D. (2001). The rational design of international institutions. International Organization, 55(4), 761–799. Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornschier, S., & Frey, T. (2006). Globalization and the transformation of the national political space: Six European countries. European Journal of Political Research, 45(6), 921–956. Layne, C. (2012). This time it’s real: The end of unipolarity and the Pax Americana. International Studies Quarterly, 56(1), 203–213. Lenz, T., & Viola, L. (2017). Legitimacy and institutional change in international organizations: A cognitive approach. Review of International Studies, 43(5), 939–961. Mansfield, E. C., & Mutz, D. C. (2012). Support for free trade: Self-interest, socio-tropic politics, and out-group anxiety. International Organization, 63(3), 425–457. Marks, G., Attewell, D., Rovny, J., & Hooghe, L. (2018). The social bases of the transnational cleavage. Unpublished manuscript. Mazur, J. (2000). Labor’s new internationalism. Foreign Affairs, 79(1), 79–93. Morgenstern, S., Tamayo, A. B., Faucher, P., & Nielson, D. (2007). Scope and trade agreements. Canadian Journal of Political Research, 40(1), 157–183. Munck, R. (2007). Globalization and contestation: The new great counter-movement. New York: Routledge. Mutz, D. C. (2018). Status threat, not economic hardship, explains the 2016 presidential vote. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(19), E4330–E4339. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1718155115. Mutz, D. C., & Kim, E. (2017). The impact of in-group favoritism on trade preferences. International Organization, 71(4), 827–850. Nielson, D. L., Hyde, S. D., & Kelley, J. (2018). The elusive sources of legitimacy beliefs: Civil society views of international election observers. Review of International Organizations. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3180219. O’Brien, R., Goetz, A. M., Scholte, J. A., & Williams, M. (Eds.). (2000). Contesting global governance: Multilateral economic institutions and global social movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Olivet, C., & Brennan, B. (2010). Regional social policy from below: Reclaiming regional integration: Social movements and civil society organizations as key protagonists. In B. Deacon, M. Macovei, L. van Langenhove, & N. Yeates (Eds.), World-regional social policy and global governance: New research and policy agendas in Africa, Asia, Europe and Latin America. London: Routledge. Polk, J., Rovny, J., Bakker, R., Edwards, E., Hooghe, L., Jolly, S., Koedam, J., Kostelka, F., Marks, G., Steenbergen, M., Vachudova, M., & Zilovic, M. (2017). Explaining the salience of anti-elitism and reducing political corruption for political parties in Europe with the 2014 Chapel Hill expert survey data. Research & Politics, 4. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168016686915. Rathbun, B. C. (2012). Trust in international cooperation: International security institutions, domestic politics, and American multilateralism. New York: Cambridge University Press. Rhodes, M., & van Apeldoorn, B. (1997). Capitalism versus capitalism in Western Europe. In M. Rhodes, P. Heywood, & V. Wright (Eds.), Developments in West European politics (pp. 171–189). New York: St. Martin’s Press. Ribeiro Hoffmann, A. (2015). Politicization and legitimacy in Mercosur. In A. Hurrelmann & S. Schneider (Eds.), The legitimacy of regional integration in Europe and the Americas (pp. 57–73). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. Rixen, T., & Zangl, B. (2013). The politicization of international economic institutions in US public debates. Review of International Organizations, 8(3), 363–387. Rocabert, J., Schimmelfennig, F., Crasnic, L., & Winzen, T. (2018). The rise of international parliamentary institutions: Purpose and legitimation. Review of International Organizations. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-018-9326-3. Romano, C., Alter, K. J., & Shany, Y. (Eds.). (2014). The Oxford handbook of international adjudication. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Ross, G. (1995). Jacques Delors and European integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Ruggie, J. G. (1982). International regimes, transactions, and change: Embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order. International Organization, 36(2), 379–415. Rydgren, J. (Ed.). (2013). Class politics and the radical right. London: Routledge. Schimmelfennig, F., Winzen, T., Lenz, T., Rocabert, J., Crasnic, L., Gherasimov, C., Lipps, J., & Mumford, D. (2018). The rise of international parliaments: Strategic legitimation in international organizations. Unpublished book manuscript. Schmidtke, H. (2018) Elite legitimation and delegitimation of international organizations in the media: Patterns and explanations. Review of International Organizations. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-018-9320-9. Simmons, B. A. (2009). Mobilizing for human rights: International law in domestic politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Smith, J., Goodhart, M., Manning, P., & Markoff, J. (Eds.). (2016). Social movements and world-system transformation. London: Routledge. Spalding, R. J. (2007). Civil society engagement in trade negotiations: CAFTA opposition movements in El Salvador. Latin American Politics and Society, 49(4), 85–114. Steger, M. B., & Wilson, E. K. (2012). Anti-globalization or alter-globalization? Mapping the political ideology of the global justice movement. International Studies Quarterly, 56(3), 439–454. Tallberg, J., & Zürn, M. (2018). The legitimacy and legitimation of international organizations: Introduction and framework. Review of International Organizations (this issue). Tallberg, J., Sommerer, T., Squatrito, T., & Jönsson, C. (2013). The opening up of international organizations: Transnational access in global governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Tarrow, S. (2005). The new transnational activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Teney, C., Lacewell, O. P., & de Wilde, P. (2014). Winners and losers of globalization in Europe: Attitudes and ideologies. European Political Science Review, 6(4), 575–595. Tsoukalis, L. (2014). The unhappy state of the union: Europe needs a new grand bargain. London: Policy Network. Van Elsas, E. J., Hakhverdian, A., & van der Brug, W. (2016). United against a common foe? The nature and origins of Euroscepticism among left-wing and right-wing citizens. West European Politics, 39(6), 1181–1204. Varoufakis, Y. (2017). Adults in the room: My battle with Europe’s deep establishment. London: Bodley Head. Whitefield, S., & Rohrschneider, R. (2016). Rethinking right, left and centre: How international issues are reshaping European party competition. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the European Consortium for Political Research, Prague. Zürn, M. (2004). Global governance and legitimacy problems. Government and Opposition, 39(2), 260–287. Zürn, M. (2018). A theory of global governance: Authority, legitimacy, and contestation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Zürn, M., Binder, M., & Ecker-Ehrhardt, M. (2012). International authority and its politicization. International Theory, 4(1), 69–106.