Sexual selection and mate choice

Majerus, 1986, The genetics and evolution of female choice, Trends Ecol. Evol., 1, 1, 10.1016/0169-5347(86)90056-X Lande, 1981, Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 78, 3721, 10.1073/pnas.78.6.3721 Kirkpatrick, 1982, Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice, Evolution, 36, 1, 10.2307/2407961 Andersson, 1994 Mead, 2004, Quantitative genetic models of sexual selection, Trends Ecol. Evol., 19, 264, 10.1016/j.tree.2004.03.003 Parker, 1979, Sexual selection and sexual conflict, 123 Arnqvist, 2005 Kokko, 2002, The sexual selection continuum, Proc. R. Soc. B, 269, 1331, 10.1098/rspb.2002.2020 Cameron, 2003, Sexual conflict and indirect benefits, J. Evol. Biol., 16, 1055, 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00584.x Kirkpatrick, 2004, Sexual selection and sex linkage, Evolution, 58, 683, 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb00401.x Andersson, 2006, Condition-dependent indicators in sexual selection: development of theory and tests, 253 Fuller, 2005, Sensory bias as an explanation for the evolution of mate preferences, Am. Nat., 166, 437, 10.1086/444443 Kokko, 2003, The evolution of mate choice and mating biases, Proc. R. Soc. B, 270, 653, 10.1098/rspb.2002.2235 Jones, 1998, Fisherian flies: benefits of female choice in a lekking sandfly, Proc. R. Soc. B, 265, 1651, 10.1098/rspb.1998.0484 Head, 2005, The indirect benefits of mating with attractive males outweigh the direct costs, PLoS Biol., 3, 289, 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030033 Tomkins, 2004, Genic capture and resolving the lek paradox, Trends Ecol. Evol., 19, 323, 10.1016/j.tree.2004.03.029 Pomiankowski, 1998, Runaway ornament diversity caused by Fisherian sexual selection, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 95, 5106, 10.1073/pnas.95.9.5106 Coyne, 2004 Erickson, 2004, Quantitative trait locus analyses and the study of the evolutionary process, Mol. Ecol., 13, 2505, 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02254.x Fitzpatrick, 2005, Candidate genes for behavioural ecology, Trends Ecol. Evol., 20, 96, 10.1016/j.tree.2004.11.017 Thomas, 2004, Genomics for the ecological toolbox, Trends Ecol. Evol., 19, 439, 10.1016/j.tree.2004.06.010 Ryan, 1998, Sexual selection, receiver biases, and the evolution of sex differences, Science, 281, 1999, 10.1126/science.281.5385.1999 Rodd, 2002, A possible non-sexual origin of mate preference: are male guppies mimicking fruit?, Proc. R. Soc. B, 269, 475, 10.1098/rspb.2001.1891 Smith, 2004, A receiver bias in the origin of three-spined stickleback mate choice, Proc. R. Soc. B, 271, 949, 10.1098/rspb.2004.2690 Slate, 2005, Quantitative trait locus mapping in natural populations: progress, caveats and future directions, Mol. Ecol., 14, 363, 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02378.x Wayne, 2002, Combining mapping and arraying: an approach to candidate gene identification, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 99, 14903, 10.1073/pnas.222549199 Barber, 2000, Split-clutch IVF: a technique to examine indirect fitness consequences of mate preference in sticklebacks, Behaviour, 137, 1129, 10.1163/156853900502484 Owens, 2006, Where is behavioural ecology going?, Trends. Ecol. Evol., 21, 10.1016/j.tree.2006.03.014 Gleason, 2002, Quantitative trait loci affecting a courtship signal in Drosophila melanogaster, Heredity, 89, 1, 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800099 Civetta, 2003, The genetics of mating recognition between Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia, Genet. Res., 82, 117, 10.1017/S0016672303006360 Brooks, 2001, Direct and indirect sexual selection and quantitative genetics of male traits in guppies (Poecilia reticulata), Evolution, 55, 1002, 10.1554/0014-3820(2001)055[1002:DAISSA]2.0.CO;2 Evans, 2003, Directional postcopulatory sexual selection revealed by artificial insemination, Nature, 421, 360, 10.1038/nature01367 Pilastro, 2004, Cryptic female preference for colorful males in guppies, Evolution, 58, 665, 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb01690.x Houde, 1997 Magurran, 2005 Williams, 1966 Trivers, 1972, Parental investment and sexual selection, 136 Holland, 1998, Chase-away sexual selection: antagonistic seduction versus resistance, Evolution, 52, 1, 10.2307/2410914 Gavrilets, 2001, The evolution of female mate choice by sexual conflict, Proc. R. Soc. B, 268, 531, 10.1098/rspb.2000.1382 Rice, 2005, Inter-locus antagonistic coevolution as an engine of speciation: assessment with hemiclonal analysis, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 102, 6527, 10.1073/pnas.0501889102 Cordero, 2003, Female choice of sexually antagonistic male adaptations: a critical review of some current research, J. Evol. Biol., 16, 1, 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00506.x Parker, 1970, Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects, Biol. Rev., 45, 525, 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1970.tb01176.x Simmons, 2001 Birkhead, 1993, Female control of paternity, Trends Ecol. Evol., 8, 100, 10.1016/0169-5347(93)90060-3 Eberhard, 1996 Bateman, 1948, Intrasexual selection in Drosophila, Heredity, 2, 349, 10.1038/hdy.1948.21 Simmons, 2005, The evolution of polyandry: sperm competition, sperm selection, and sperm viability, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst., 36, 125, 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102403.112501 Keller, 1995, Why do females mate with multiple males? The sexually selected sperm hypothesis, Adv. Stud. Behav., 24, 291, 10.1016/S0065-3454(08)60397-6 Pizzari, 2002, The sexually-selected sperm hypothesis: sex-biased inheritance and sexual antagonism, Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc., 77, 183, 10.1017/S1464793101005863 Eberhard, 1985 Hosken, 2004, Sexual selection and genital evolution, Trend. Ecol. Evol., 19, 87, 10.1016/j.tree.2003.11.012 House, 2003, Genital morphology and fertilization success in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus: an example of sexually selected male genitalia, Proc. R. Soc. B, 270, 447, 10.1098/rspb.2002.2266 Yasui, 1997, A ‘good-sperm’ model can explain the evolution of costly multiple mating by females, Am. Nat., 149, 573, 10.1086/286006 Kozielska, 2004, Good genes and the maternal effects of polyandry on offspring reproductive success in the bulb mite, Proc. R. Soc. B, 271, 165, 10.1098/rspb.2003.2585 Hosken, 2003, Superior sperm competitors sire higher-quality young, Proc. R. Soc. B, 270, 1933, 10.1098/rspb.2003.2443 Simmons, 2002, Evolution of ejaculates: patterns of phenotypic and genotypic variation and condition dependence in sperm competition traits, Evolution, 56, 1622, 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01474.x Møller, 1998, Sperm competition and sexual selection, 55 McLain, 1991, Components of variance in male lifetime copulatory and reproductive success in a seed bug, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 29, 121, 10.1007/BF00166486 Westneat, 2003, Extra-pair paternity in birds: causes, correlates, and conflict, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst., 34, 365, 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132439 Safran, 2005, Dynamic paternity allocation as a function of male plumage color in barn swallows, Science, 309, 2210, 10.1126/science.1115090 Bennett, 2002 Warner, 1995, Sexual conflict: males with highest mating success convey the lowest fertilization benefits to females, Proc. R. Soc. B, 262, 135, 10.1098/rspb.1995.0187 Danielsson, 2000, Antagonistic pre- and post-copulatory sexual selection on male body size in a water strider (Gerris lacustris), Proc. R. Soc. B, 268, 77, 10.1098/rspb.2000.1332 Preston, 2001, Dominant rams lose out by sperm depletion, Nature, 409, 681, 10.1038/35055617 Zeh, 1996, The evolution of polyandry I: intragenomic conflict and genetic incompatibility, Proc. R. Soc. B, 263, 1711, 10.1098/rspb.1996.0250 Tregenza, 2000, Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage, Mol. Ecol., 9, 1013, 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.00964.x Colegrave, 2002, Mate choice or polyandry: reconciling genetic compatibility and good genes sexual selection, Evol. Ecol. Res., 4, 911 Mays, 2004, Choosing mates: good genes versus genes that are a good fit, Trends Ecol. Evol., 19, 554, 10.1016/j.tree.2004.07.018 Stockley, 1997, Sexual conflict resulting from adaptations to sperm competition, Trends Ecol. Evol., 12, 154, 10.1016/S0169-5347(97)01000-8 Chapman, 2004, Functions and analysis of the seminal fluid proteins of male Drosophila melanogaster fruit flies, Peptides, 25, 1477, 10.1016/j.peptides.2003.10.023 Swanson, 2002, The rapid evolution of reproductive proteins, Nat. Rev. Genet., 3, 137, 10.1038/nrg733 Good, 2005, Rates of protein evolution are positively correlated with developmental timing of expression during mouse spermatogenesis, Mol. Biol. Evol., 22, 1044, 10.1093/molbev/msi087 Orteiza, 2005, Sexy sons from re-mating do not recoup the direct costs of harmful male interactions in the Drosophila melanogaster laboratory model system, J. Evol. Biol., 18, 1315, 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.00923.x Friberg, 2005, Assessing the potential for an ongoing arms race within and between the sexes: selection and heritable variation, Evolution, 59, 1540, 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01803.x Byrne, 2005, Remating in Drosophila melanogaster: an examination of the trading-up and intrinsic male-quality hypotheses, J. Evol. Biol., 18, 1324, 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.00918.x Møller, 2001, How important are direct fitness benefits of sexual selection?, Naturwissenschaften, 88, 401, 10.1007/s001140100255 Endler, 1998, Sensory ecology, receiver biases and sexual selection, Trends Ecol. Evol., 13, 415, 10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01471-2 Boughman, 2002, How sensory drive can promote speciation, Trends Ecol. Evol., 17, 571, 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02595-8 Folstad, 1992, Parasites, bright males, and the immunocompetence handicap, Am. Nat., 139, 603, 10.1086/285346 Hamilton, 1982, Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites?, Science, 218, 384, 10.1126/science.7123238 Iwasa, 1991, The evolution of costly mate preferences II. The ‘handicap’ principle, Evolution, 45, 1431, 10.2307/2409890 Rowe, 1996, The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits, Proc. R. Soc. B, 263, 1415, 10.1098/rspb.1996.0207 Houle, 2002, Coevolution of costly mate choice and condition-dependent display of good genes, Proc. R. Soc. B, 269, 97, 10.1098/rspb.2001.1823 Neff, 2005, Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes, Mol. Ecol., 14, 19, 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02395.x Bonduriansky, 2005, Sexual selection, genetic architecture, and the condition dependence of body shape in the sexually dimorphic fly Prochyliza xanthostoma (Piophilidae), Evolution, 59, 138, 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb00901.x Pizzari, 2000, Female feral fowl eject sperm of subordinate males, Nature, 405, 787, 10.1038/35015558 Wedell, 2002, Sperm competition, male prudence and sperm-limited females, Trends Ecol. Evol., 17, 313, 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02533-8 Birkhead, 2000, Defining and demonstrating postcopulatory female choice – again, Evolution, 54, 1057 Calsbeek, 2004, Within-clutch variation in offspring sex determined by differences in sire body size: cryptic mate choice in the wild, J. Evol. Biol., 17, 464, 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00665.x Olsson, 1996, Sperm selection by females, Nature, 383, 585, 10.1038/383585a0 Marshall, 2003, Sexual selection and individual genetic diversity in a songbird, Proc. R. Soc. B, 270, S248, 10.1098/rsbl.2003.0081 Folstad, 1997, Is male germ line control creating avenues for female choice?, Behav. Ecol., 8, 109, 10.1093/beheco/8.1.109 Rolff, 2002, Bateman's principle and immunity, Proc. R. Soc. B, 269, 867, 10.1098/rspb.2002.1959 Skau, 2005, Does immunity regulate ejaculate quality and fertility in humans?, Behav. Ecol., 16, 410, 10.1093/beheco/ari004 Jacot, 2004, Costs of an induced immune response on sexual display and longevity in field crickets, Evolution, 58, 2280, 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb01603.x Faivre, 2003, Immune activation rapidly mirrored in a secondary sexual trait, Science, 300, 103, 10.1126/science.1081802 Blount, 2003, Carotenoid modulation of immune function and sexual attractiveness in zebra finches, Science, 300, 125, 10.1126/science.1082142 Simmons, 2005, Bacterial immunity traded for sperm viability in male crickets, Science, 309, 2031, 10.1126/science.1114500