Advances for achieving a pathological complete response for rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy

Chronic Diseases and Translational Medicine - Tập 2 - Trang 10-16 - 2016
Jian Cui1, Hui Fang2, Lin Zhang1, Yun-Long Wu1, Hai-Zeng Zhang1
1Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
2Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China

Tóm tắt

Abstract

Neoadjuvant therapy has become the standard of care for locally advanced mid‐low rectal cancer. Pathological complete response (pCR) can be achieved in 12%–38% of patients. Patients with pCR have the most favorable long‐term outcomes. Intensifying neoadjuvant therapy and extending the interval between termination of neoadjuvant treatment and surgery may increase the pCR rate. Growing evidence has raised the issue of whether local excision or observation rather than radical surgery is an alternative for patients who achieve a clinical complete response after neoadjuvant therapy. Herein, we highlight many of the advances and resultant controversies that are likely to dominate the research agenda for pCR of rectal cancer in the modern era.


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1038/nrclinonc.2011.118 10.1245/s10434-011-1822-0 10.1093/annonc/mdr473 10.1093/annonc/mdw062 Cui J., 2015, Surgical management of patients with pathologic complete response in the primary tumor after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for rectal cancer, Chin J Oncol, 37, 456 10.1007/s00384-010-1082-7 10.1007/s00384-013-1821-7 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000368 10.1245/s10434-011-2209-y 10.1245/s10434-010-1506-1 10.1097/01.sla.0000141194.27992.32 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.01.042 10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182a25c4e 10.1200/JCO.2011.37.7176 Lee C.T., 2012, Computed tomography with histological correlation for evaluating tumor regression of rectal carcinoma after preoperative chemoradiation therapy, Hepatogastroenterology, 59, 2484 10.1016/j.surg.2010.03.025 10.1245/s10434-006-9269-4 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.01.002 10.1007/s00384-012-1419-5 10.1148/rg.263055086 10.1245/s10434-011-2210-5 10.1148/rg.303095085 10.1245/s10434-011-1607-5 10.1002/jmri.24835 10.1148/radiol.2272011747 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70172-8 10.1056/NEJMoa040694 10.1002/bjs.5679 10.1200/JCO.2005.14.779 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.3.817 10.1056/NEJMoa010580 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60484-0 10.1245/s10434-009-0735-7 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02777.x 10.1016/S1072-7515(01)01159-0 10.1002/bjs.8700 10.1016/j.suronc.2007.10.008 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181f5b64d 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02761.x 10.1007/s11912-013-0297-5 10.1097/01.sla.0000161980.46459.96 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.0467 10.1016/S0959-8049(02)00377-5 10.1200/JCO.2005.08.144 10.1002/bjs.5506 10.1200/JCO.2012.42.9597 10.1056/NEJMoa060829 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.7629 10.1200/JCO.2010.34.4911 10.1016/S0360-3016(99)00486-1 10.1200/JCO.2013.51.7904 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.02.037 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.08.005 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00004-2 10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.3500 10.1245/s10434-012-2327-1 10.1002/bjs.6377 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.10.061 10.4174/jkss.2013.84.6.338 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2273 10.1007/s00432-014-1712-5 10.1245/s10434-011-2044-1