Optimization of reconstruction and quantification of motion-corrected coronary PET-CT

Journal of Nuclear Cardiology - Tập 27 - Trang 494-504 - 2018
Mhairi K. Doris1,2, Yuka Otaki2, Sandeep K. Krishnan2, Jacek Kwiecinski1,2, Mathieu Rubeaux2, Adam Alessio3, Tinsu Pan4, Sebastien Cadet2, Damini Dey2, Marc R. Dweck1, David E. Newby1, Daniel S. Berman2, Piotr J. Slomka2,5
1BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Clinical Research Imaging Centre, Edinburgh Heart Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
2Department of Imaging and Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA
3Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
4Department of Imaging Physics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, USA
5Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Program, Los Angeles, USA

Tóm tắt

Coronary PET shows promise in the detection of high-risk atherosclerosis, but there remains a need to optimize imaging and reconstruction techniques. We investigated the impact of reconstruction parameters and cardiac motion-correction in 18F Sodium Fluoride (18F-NaF) PET. Twenty-two patients underwent 18F-NaF PET within 22 days of an acute coronary syndrome. Optimal reconstruction parameters were determined in a subgroup of six patients. Motion-correction was performed on ECG-gated data of all patients with optimal reconstruction. Tracer uptake was quantified in culprit and reference lesions by computing signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in diastolic, summed, and motion-corrected images. Reconstruction using 24 subsets, 4 iterations, point-spread-function modelling, time of flight, and 5-mm post-filtering provided the highest median SNR (31.5) compared to 4 iterations 0-mm (22.5), 8 iterations 0-mm (21.1), and 8 iterations 5-mm (25.6; all P < .05). Motion-correction improved SNR of culprit lesions (n = 33) (24.5[19.9-31.5]) compared to diastolic (15.7[12.4-18.1]; P < .001) and summed data (22.1[18.9-29.2]; P < .001). Motion-correction increased the SNR difference between culprit and reference lesions (10.9[6.3-12.6]) compared to diastolic (6.2[3.6-10.3]; P = .001) and summed data (7.1 [4.8-11.6]; P = .001). The number of iterations and extent of post-filtering has marked effects on coronary 18F-NaF PET quantification. Cardiac motion-correction improves discrimination between culprit and reference lesions.

Tài liệu tham khảo