Quantitative characterization method of 3D roughness of rock mass structural surface considering size effect

Smart Construction and Sustainable Cities - Tập 1 - Trang 1-12 - 2023
Bo Li1, Xinjun Li1, Wei Xiao1, Qi Cheng1, Tan Bao1
1Northwest Institute of Nuclear Technology, Xi’an, China

Tóm tắt

The surface morphology of the structural surface of the rock mass plays a crucial role in determining its macroscopic physical and mechanical properties, including shear strength and seepage characteristics. The morphological characteristics of the rock mass structure exhibit significant anisotropy and size effects. The distribution characteristics of the two key indicators that affect the morphological characteristics of the structure were analyzed, revealing that the undulation degree and undulation angle conform to the normal distribution and Weibull distribution, respectively. The present study defines a method for quantifying the 3D roughness of structural surface based on the features of undulation degree and undulation angle. Through quantitative analysis, it was observed that the roughness parameters exhibit anisotropic characteristics at different sampling intervals and shear directions.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Zhang XB, Jiang QH, Chen N et al (2016) Laboratory investigation on shear behavior of rock joints and a new peak shear strength criterion. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49:3495–3512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-016-1012-2 Barton N (1973) Review of a new shear strength criterion for rock joints. Eng Geol 7:287–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(74)90491-4 Chen SJ, Zhu WC, Wang CY, Zhang F (2017) Review of research progresses of the quantifying joint roughness coefficient. Chin J Theor Appl Mech 49:239–256. https://lxxb.cstam.org.cn/cn/article/doi/10.6052/0459-1879-16-255 (in Chinese) Belem T, Homand-Etienne F, Souley M (2000) Quantitative parameter for rock joint surface roughness. Rock Mech Rock Eng 33:217–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s006030070001 Grasselli G, Wirthc J, Egger P (2002) Quantitative three-dimensional description of a rough surface and parameter evolution with shearing. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 39:789–800. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(02)00070-9 Tatone BSA, Grasselli G (2009) A method to evaluate the three-dimensional roughness of fracture surfaces in brittle geomaterials. Rev Sci Instrum 80:125110. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3266964 Yin HM, Zhang YH, Kong XH (2011) Estimation of joint shear strength based on fractal method. Hydrogeol Eng Geol 38(4):58–62. (in Chinese) Ge YF, Tang HM, Huang L, Wang LQ, Sun MJ, Fan YJ (2012) A new representation method for three-dimensional joint roughness coefficient of rock mass discontinuities. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 31(12):2508–2517. (in Chinese) Ge YF, Tang HM, Wang LQ, Zhao BB, Wu YP, Xiong CR (2016) Study on roughness anisotropy, size effect and spacing effect of natural rock mass. J Geotech Eng 38:170–179. https://doi.org/10.11779/CJGE201601019 Sun Q, Zhang W, Zhao YP, Han B, Zhao XH (2021) Nap-of-the-object for collecting structure surface and roughness analysis of high-steep rock slopes. J Eng Geol 29(5):1460–1468. https://doi.org/10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2021-0406. (in Chinese) Ge YF, Chen KL, Liu Geng, Zhang YQ, Tang HM (2022) A low-cost approach for the estimation of rock joint roughness using photogrammetry. Eng Geol 305:106726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2022.106726 Yu XB, Vayssade B (1991) Joint profiles and their roughness parameters. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 28:333–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(91)90598-G Xia CC (1996) Study on surface morphology of rock structural surfaces. J Eng Geol 4:71–78 Abolfazli M, Fahimifar A (2020) An investigation on the correlation between the joint roughness coefficient (JRC) and joint roughness parameters. Constr Build Mater 259:120415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120415 Bae DS, Kim KS, Koh YK, Kim JY (2011) Characterization of joint roughness in granite by applying the scan circle technique to images from a borehole televiewer. Rock Mech Rock Eng 44:497–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-011-0134-9 Li YR, Huang RQ (2015) Relationship between joint roughness coefficient and fractal dimension of rock fracture surfaces. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 75:15–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2015.01.007 Ge YF, Tang HM, Cheng H, Wang LQ, Xiong CR (2015) Direct shear tests study forrelationship between surface temperature and surface roughness of rock joints. J Eng Geol 23:624–633. https://doi.org/10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2015.04.006 Tang ZC, Liu QS, Xia CC (2015) Investigation of three-dimensional roughness scale-dependency and peak shear strength criterion. J Cent South Univ Sci Technol 46:2524–2531 Gao TL, Cheng B, Chen JL, Chen M (2017) Enhancing collaborative filtering via topic model integrated uniform Euclidean distance. Serv Commun Fog Comput 14:48–58. https://doi.org/10.1109/CC.2017.8233650 Lee YH, Carr JR, Bars DJ, Hass CJ (1990) The fractal dimension as measure of the roughness of rock discontinuity profiles. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 27:453–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(90)90998 Weibull W (1957) A statistical distribution function of wide applicability. J Appl Mech 18:293–297. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4010337