Control of transposon activity by a histone H3K4 demethylase in rice

Xiekui Cui1,2, Ping Jin3,4, Xia Cui1, Lianfeng Gu1, Zhike Lu1, Yongming Xue1,2, Liya Wei1,2, Jianfei Qi1, Xianwei Song1, Ming Luo5, Gynheung An3, Xiaofeng Cao1
1State Key Laboratory of Plant Genomics and National Center for Plant Gene Research, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039, China
3Crop Biotech Institute, Kyung Hee University, Yongin 446-701, Korea;
4Department of Life Science, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang 790-784, Korea; and
5Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Plant Industry, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia.

Tóm tắt

Transposable elements (TEs) are ubiquitously present in plant genomes and often account for significant fractions of the nuclear DNA. For example, roughly 40% of the rice genome consists of TEs, many of which are retrotransposons, including 14% LTR- and ∼1% non-LTR retrotransposons. Despite their wide distribution and abundance, very few TEs have been found to be transpositional, indicating that TE activities may be tightly controlled by the host genome to minimize the potentially mutagenic effects associated with active transposition. Consistent with this notion, a growing body of evidence suggests that epigenetic silencing pathways such as DNA methylation, RNA interference, and H3K9me2 function collectively to repress TE activity at the transcriptional and posttranscriptional levels. It is not yet clear, however, whether the removal of histone modifications associated with active transcription is also involved in TE silencing. Here, we show that the rice protein JMJ703 is an active H3K4-specific demethylase required for TEs silencing. Impaired JMJ703 activity led to elevated levels of H3K4me3, the misregulation of numerous endogenous genes, and the transpositional reactivation of two families of non-LTR retrotransposons. Interestingly, loss of JMJ703 did not affect TEs (such as Tos17 ) previously found to be silenced by other epigenetic pathways. These results indicate that the removal of active histone modifications is involved in TE silencing and that different subsets of TEs may be regulated by distinct epigenetic pathways.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

C Feschotte, N Jiang, SR Wessler, Plant transposable elements: Where genetics meets genomics. Nat Rev Genet 3, 329–341 (2002).

A Kumar, JL Bennetzen, Plant retrotransposons. Annu Rev Genet 33, 479–532 (1999).

JL Goodier, HH Kazazian, Retrotransposons revisited: The restraint and rehabilitation of parasites. Cell 135, 23–35 (2008).

D Lisch, Epigenetic regulation of transposable elements in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 60, 43–66 (2009).

D Lisch, JL Bennetzen, Transposable element origins of epigenetic gene regulation. Curr Opin Plant Biol 14, 156–161 (2011).

KH Burns, JD Boeke, Human transposon tectonics. Cell 149, 740–752 (2012).

HL Levin, JV Moran, Dynamic interactions between transposable elements and their hosts. Nat Rev Genet 12, 615–627 (2011).

Y Ding, et al., SDG714, a histone H3K9 methyltransferase, is involved in Tos17 DNA methylation and transposition in rice. Plant Cell 19, 9–22 (2007).

H La, et al., A 5-methylcytosine DNA glycosylase/lyase demethylates the retrotransposon Tos17 and promotes its transposition in rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108, 15498–15503 (2011).

Z Lippman, et al., Role of transposable elements in heterochromatin and epigenetic control. Nature 430, 471–476 (2004).

M Mirouze, et al., Selective epigenetic control of retrotransposition in Arabidopsis. Nature 461, 427–430 (2009).

A Miura, et al., Mobilization of transposons by a mutation abolishing full DNA methylation in Arabidopsis. Nature 411, 212–214 (2001).

S Tsukahara, et al., Bursts of retrotransposition reproduced in Arabidopsis. Nature 461, 423–426 (2009).

O Mathieu, J Reinders, M Caikovski, C Smathajitt, J Paszkowski, Transgenerational stability of the Arabidopsis epigenome is coordinated by CG methylation. Cell 130, 851–862 (2007).

F Roudier, et al., Integrative epigenomic mapping defines four main chromatin states in Arabidopsis. EMBO J 30, 1928–1938 (2011).

X Zhang, The epigenetic landscape of plants. Science 320, 489–492 (2008).

N Mosammaparast, Y Shi, Reversal of histone methylation: biochemical and molecular mechanisms of histone demethylases. Annu Rev Biochem 79, 155–179 (2010).

Y Tsukada, et al., Histone demethylation by a family of JmjC domain-containing proteins. Nature 439, 811–816 (2006).

S Inagaki, et al., Autocatalytic differentiation of epigenetic modifications within the Arabidopsis genome. EMBO J 29, 3496–3506 (2010).

A Miura, et al., An Arabidopsis jmjC domain protein protects transcribed genes from DNA methylation at CHG sites. EMBO J 28, 1078–1086 (2009).

A Deleris, et al., Involvement of a Jumonji-C domain-containing histone demethylase in DRM2-mediated maintenance of DNA methylation. EMBO Rep 11, 950–955 (2010).

F Lu, X Cui, S Zhang, C Liu, X Cao, JMJ14 is an H3K4 demethylase regulating flowering time in Arabidopsis. Cell Res 20, 387–390 (2010).

W Yang, D Jiang, J Jiang, Y He, A plant-specific histone H3 lysine 4 demethylase represses the floral transition in Arabidopsis. Plant J 62, 663–673 (2010).

IR Searle, O Pontes, CW Melnyk, LM Smith, DC Baulcombe, JMJ14, a JmjC domain protein, is required for RNA silencing and cell-to-cell movement of an RNA silencing signal in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev 24, 986–991 (2010).

SA Goff, et al., A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L. ssp. japonica). Science 296, 92–100 (2002).

H Hirochika, A Fukuchi, F Kikuchi, Retrotransposon families in rice. Mol Gen Genet 233, 209–216 (1992).

S Wang, N Liu, K Peng, Q Zhang, The distribution and copy number of copia-like retrotransposons in rice (Oryza sativa L.) and their implications in the organization and evolution of the rice genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96, 6824–6828 (1999).

; International Rice Genome Sequencing Project, The map-based sequence of the rice genome. Nature 436, 793–800 (2005).

QH Le, S Wright, Z Yu, T Bureau, Transposon diversity in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97, 7376–7381 (2000).

K Noma, E Ohtsubo, H Ohtsubo, Non-LTR retrotransposons (LINEs) as ubiquitous components of plant genomes. Mol Gen Genet 261, 71–79 (1999).

K Turcotte, S Srinivasan, T Bureau, Survey of transposable elements from rice genomic sequences. Plant J 25, 169–179 (2001).

H Hirochika, K Sugimoto, Y Otsuki, H Tsugawa, M Kanda, Retrotransposons of rice involved in mutations induced by tissue culture. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93, 7783–7788 (1996).

M Komatsu, K Shimamoto, J Kyozuka, Two-step regulation and continuous retrotransposition of the rice LINE-type retrotransposon Karma. Plant Cell 15, 1934–1944 (2003).

C Cheng, M Daigen, H Hirochika, Epigenetic regulation of the rice retrotransposon Tos17. Mol Genet Genomics 276, 378–390 (2006).

F Lu, et al., Comparative analysis of JmjC domain-containing proteins reveals the potential histone demethylases in Arabidopsis and rice. J Integr Plant Biol 50, 886–896 (2008).

S An, et al., Generation and analysis of end sequence database for T-DNA tagging lines in rice. Plant Physiol 133, 2040–2047 (2003).

DH Jeong, et al., T-DNA insertional mutagenesis for activation tagging in rice. Plant Physiol 130, 1636–1644 (2002).

G He, et al., Global epigenetic and transcriptional trends among two rice subspecies and their reciprocal hybrids. Plant Cell 22, 17–33 (2010).

S Ouyang, et al., The TIGR Rice Genome Annotation Resource: improvements and new features. Nucleic Acids Res 35, D883–D887 (2007).

X Zhang, YV Bernatavichute, S Cokus, M Pellegrini, SE Jacobsen, Genome-wide analysis of mono-, di- and trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 4 in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genome Biol 10, R62 (2009).

YV Bernatavichute, X Zhang, S Cokus, M Pellegrini, SE Jacobsen, Genome-wide association of histone H3 lysine nine methylation with CHG DNA methylation in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS ONE 3, e3156 (2008).

L Johnson, X Cao, S Jacobsen, Interplay between two epigenetic marks. DNA methylation and histone H3 lysine 9 methylation. Curr Biol 12, 1360–1367 (2002).

SW Chan, IR Henderson, SE Jacobsen, Gardening the genome: DNA methylation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat Rev Genet 6, 351–360 (2005).

M Kato, A Miura, J Bender, SE Jacobsen, T Kakutani, Role of CG and non-CG methylation in immobilization of transposons in Arabidopsis. Curr Biol 13, 421–426 (2003).

R Lister, et al., Highly integrated single-base resolution maps of the epigenome in Arabidopsis. Cell 133, 523–536 (2008).

H Saze, O Mittelsten Scheid, J Paszkowski, Maintenance of CpG methylation is essential for epigenetic inheritance during plant gametogenesis. Nat Genet 34, 65–69 (2003).

X Zhang, et al., Genome-wide high-resolution mapping and functional analysis of DNA methylation in arabidopsis. Cell 126, 1189–1201 (2006).

H Ito, et al., An siRNA pathway prevents transgenerational retrotransposition in plants subjected to stress. Nature 472, 115–119 (2011).

Z Cheng, CR Buell, RA Wing, M Gu, J Jiang, Toward a cytological characterization of the rice genome. Genome Res 11, 2133–2141 (2001).

H Yan, J Jiang, Rice as a model for centromere and heterochromatin research. Chromosome Res 15, 77–84 (2007).

JR Korenberg, MC Rykowski, Human genome organization: Alu, lines, and the molecular structure of metaphase chromosome bands. Cell 53, 391–400 (1988).

DC Hancks, HH Kazazian, Active human retrotransposons: Variation and disease. Curr Opin Genet Dev 22, 191–203 (2012).

BL Yin et al. Integration of cytological features with molecular and epigenetic properties of rice chromosome 4. Mol Plant 1(5):816–829. (2008).

X Cao, SE Jacobsen, Locus-specific control of asymmetric and CpNpG methylation by the DRM and CMT3 methyltransferase genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99, 16491–16498 (2002).