Determinants of never-treated status in rural versus urban contexts for individuals with schizophrenia in a population-based study in China

BMC Psychiatry - Tập 22 - Trang 1-11 - 2022
Lawrence H. Yang1,2, Michael R. Phillips2,3,4,5, Xianyun Li6, Gary Yu7, Margaux M. Grivel1, Jingxuan Zhang8, Qichang Shi9, Zhijie Ding10, Shutao Pang11, Ezra Susser2
1Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, New York University School of Global Public Health, New York, USA
2Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, USA
3Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
4Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, USA
5New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, USA
6Beijing Hui Long Guan Hospital, Beijing, China
7Rory Meyers College of Nursing, New York University, New York, USA
8Shandong Provincial Mental Health, Jinan City, China
9Tong De Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou City, China
10The 3rd People’s Hospital of Tianshui City, Tianshui, China
11Qingdao Blood Center, Qingdao City, China

Tóm tắt

A goal of China’s 2012 National Mental Health Law is to improve access to services and decrease urban versus rural disparities in services. However, pre-reform data is needed for objective evaluation of these reforms’ effectiveness. Accordingly, this study compares the pre-reform utilization of medical services for the treatment of schizophrenia in rural and urban communities in China. In a large community-based study in four provinces representing 12% of China’s population conducted from 2001 to 2005, we identified 326 individuals with schizophrenia (78 never treated). Comparing those living in urban (n = 86) versus rural (n = 240) contexts, we used adjusted Poisson regression models to assess the relationship of ‘never treated’ status with family-level factors (marital status, family income, and number of co-resident family members) and illness severity factors (age of onset, symptom severity and functional impairment). Despite similar impairments due to symptoms, rural patients were less likely to have received intensive mental health services (i.e., use psychiatric inpatient services), and appeared more likely to be ‘never treated’ or to only have received outpatient care. Among rural patients, only having more than four co-resident family members was independently associated with ‘never-treated’ status (RR = 0.34; 95% CI, 0.12–0.94; p = 0.039). Among urban patients, only older age of onset was independently associated with ‘never-treated’ status (RR = 1.06; 95% CI 1.02–1.10, p = 0.003). Identifying differential drivers of service utilization in urban and rural communities is needed before implementing policies to improve the utilization and equity of services and to define metrics of program success.

Tài liệu tham khảo