Fertility awareness-based methods of family planning: A review of effectiveness for avoiding pregnancy using SORT

Mosher WD, Martinez GM, Chandra A, et al. Use of contraception and use of family planning services in the United States: 1982-2002. Advanced data from Vital and Health Statistics CDC # 350, December 10, 2004 Stanford, 1998, Women's interest in natural family planning, J Fam Pract, 46, 65 Stanford, 1999, Physicians' knowledge and practices regarding natural family planning, Obstet Gynecol, 94, 672, 10.1016/S0029-7844(99)00388-9 Mosher, 2010, Use of contraception in the United States: 1982-2008. National Center for Health Statistics, Vital Health Stat, 23 World Health Organization (WHO): Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use. 4th ed. Geneva, Switzerland; 2009. 91-92. Wilcox, 1995, Timing of sexual intercourse in relation to ovulation, N Engl J Med, 333, 1517, 10.1056/NEJM199512073332301 Hatcher RA, Trussell J, Nelson AL. Contraceptive Technology 19th revised ed. Ardent Media New York 2009 Sinai, 2004, The importance of screening and monitoring: the Standard Days Method and cycle regularity, Contraception, 69, 201, 10.1016/j.contraception.2003.11.007 Arévalo, 2002, Efficacy of a new method of family planning: the Standard Days Method, Contraception, 65, 333, 10.1016/S0010-7824(02)00288-3 Ebell, 2004, Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT): a patient-centered approach to grading evidence in the medical literature, Am Fam Physician, 69, 548 Sinai I. Different methods for different needs: perception, behavior, and effectiveness. In: Fehring RJ, Notare T, eds. Human Fertility: where faith and science meet. Proceedings of an interdisciplinary conference. Washing, DC: Marquette University Press, Milwaukee, WI; August 11-12, 2006: 158-167 Grimes, 2005, Fertility awareness-based methods for contraception: systematic review of randomized controlled trials, Contraception, 72, 85, 10.1016/j.contraception.2005.03.010 Lamprecht, 1997, Natural family planning effectiveness: evaluating published reports, Adv Contracept, 13, 155, 10.1023/A:1006595703472 Higgins, 1985, Statistical comparison of Pearl rates, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 151, 656, 10.1016/0002-9378(85)90158-9 Trussell, 1990, Contraceptive failure of the Ovulation Method of Periodic Abstinence, Fam Plann Perspect, 22, 65, 10.2307/2135511 World Health Organization, 1981, A prospective multicenter trial of the ovulation method of natural family planning II. The effectiveness phase, Fertil Steril, 36, 591, 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)45856-5 Frank-Herrmann, 1997, Natural family planning with and without barrier method use in the fertile phase: efficacy in relation to sexual behavior: a German prospective long-term study, Adv Contracept, 13, 179, 10.1023/A:1006551921219 Frank-Herrmann, 2007, The effectiveness of a fertility awareness based method to avoid pregnancy in relation to a couple's sexual behaviour during the fertile time: a prospective longitudinal study, Hum Reprod, 22, 1310, 10.1093/humrep/dem003 Hilgers, 1998, Creighton model naproeducation technology for avoiding pregnancy-use effectiveness, J Reprod Med, 43, 495 Howard, 1999, Pregnancy probabilities during use of the Creighton model of FertilityCareTM system, Arch Fam Med, 8, 391, 10.1001/archfami.8.5.391 1996, Field trail of billings ovulation method of natural family planning, Contraception, 53, 69 Trussell, 1991, Further analysis of contraceptive failure of the ovulation method, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 165, 2054, 10.1016/S0002-9378(11)90581-X Fehring, 2007, Efficacy of cervical mucus observations plus electronic hormonal fertility monitoring as a method of natural family planning, J Obstet Gynecol Neonat Nurs, 36, 152, 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2007.000129.x Arevalo, 2004, Efficacy of the new TwoDay Method of family planning, Fert Ster, 82, 885, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.03.040 Trussell, 2011, Contraceptive failure in the United States, Contraception, 83, 397, 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.01.021 Winner, 2012, Effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraception, N Engl J Med, 366, 1998, 10.1056/NEJMoa1110855 NCT 01012596: Creighton Model Effectiveness, Intentions and Behaviors Assessment. Available at: 〈http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT01012596?term=natural+family+planning&rank=1〉. Accessed June 2, 2012 Fehring, 2011, Pilot evaluation of an internet-based natural family planning education and service program, J Obstet Gynecol Neonat Nurs, 40, 281, 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2011.01237.x VandeVusse, 2003, Couples' views of the effects of natural family planning on marital dynamics, J Nurs Scholarship, 35, 171, 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2003.00171.x Pallone, 2009, Fertility awareness-based methods: another option for family planning, J Am Board Fam Med, 22, 147, 10.3122/jabfm.2009.02.080038 Hatcher, RA, Trussell J, Nelson AL. Contraceptive Technology. 19th revised ed. Ardent Media. New York 2009 759 Ortho Evra professional labeling. Available at: 〈http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2011/021180s040lbl.pdf〉. Accessed May 21, 2012. FDA professional labeling of several contraceptives contains similar information Fu, 1999, Contraceptive failure rates: new estimates from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth, Fam Plan Perspec, 31, 56, 10.2307/2991640 Gnoth, 2003, Time to pregnancy; results of the German prospective study and impact on the management of infertility, Hum Reprod, 18, 1959, 10.1093/humrep/deg366 Hilgers, 1992, Cumulative pregnancy rates in patients with apparently normal fertility and fertility-focused intercourse, J Reprod Med, 37, 864 Stanford, 2008, Outcomes from treatment of infertility with natural procreative technology in an Irish general practice, J Am Board Fam Med, 21, 375, 10.3122/jabfm.2008.05.070239 Tham, 2012, Natural procreative technology for infertility and recurrent miscarriage; outcomes in a Canadian family practice, Can Fam Physician, 58, e267 Gnoth, 2002, Cycle characteristics after discontinuation of oral contraceptives, Gynecol Endocrinol, 16, 307, 10.1080/713603100 Sinai I, Cachan J. A bridge for postpartum women to Standard Days Method II. Efficacy study. Contraception. 2012;86(1):16–21