The GRADE approach is reproducible in assessing the quality of evidence of quantitative evidence syntheses
Reem A. Mustafa1, Nancy Santesso1, Jan Brozek1,2, Elie A. Akl1,3, Stephen D. Walter1, Geoff Norman1, Mahan Kulasegaram1, Robin Christensen4, Gordon H. Guyatt1,2, Yngve Falck-Ytter5, Stephanie Chang6, Mohammad Hassan Murad7, Gunn E. Vist8, Toby Lasserson9, Gerald Gartlehner10, Vijay Shukla11, Xin Sun12, Craig Whittington13, Piet N. Post14, Eddy Lang15
1Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada
2Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada
3Department of Medicine, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
4Musculoskeletal Statistics Unit, The Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark
5Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
6Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD 20850, USA
7Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
8Norwegian Knowledge Centre for Health Services, Oslo 0130, Norway
9Cochrane Editorial Unit, London, UK
10RTI International, Durham, NC, USA
11Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technology in Health (CADTH), Ottawa, ON, K1S 5S8, Canada
12Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR 97227, USA
13National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, London, UK
14Post Voor Zorg, Delft, The Netherlands
15Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, 2Nt 2T9, Canada
Tài liệu tham khảo
Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Tập 66
736-742.e5
Thông tin tác giả